Loading journals

Reading the catalog.

Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi — AJIndex

AJIndex

Saved Add your journal

Journals / Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi DergisiSosyal

Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım AŞ · Sosyal > Sosyal

Scope not stated

Journal website

2021 · Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 1

Article	Author	Pages
OFFENSE OF ENTERING A PRISON OR DETENTION CENTRE IMPERSONATING ANOTHER	E. Eylem AKSOY RETORNAZ	49–66
HOW TO INTERPRET HEGEL’S NOTION OF FREEDOM TODAY	Birden GÜNGÖREN BULGAN	119–132
IN FRAMEWORK OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY FALSE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE	Can CANPOLAT	267–313
THE MAIN TRANSNATIONAL CRIMES: ATTEMPTS AT DEFINITION AND CODIFICATION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW	Yeliz KULALI MARTIN	315–343
THE MOST RECENT TRANSFER FROM BATTLEFIELDS TO MARITIME DOMAIN: GNSS JAMMING AND SPOOFING & A SHORT TECHNICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS THEREOF	Bleda R. KURTDARCAN, F. Kayhan OLGUNGÜL	345–365
MARXISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THEORY OR CRITICISM?	Atahan DEMİRKOL	417–454
THE IMMIGRANTS IN THE SHADOW OF COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW	Göksu IŞIK	455–515
CARL SCHMITT AND RETHINK HUMAN RIGHTS AGAIN IN AGE OF TERORISM	Haşim ÖZPOLAT	517–558
MARKET FRAUD (MANIPULATION) IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW	Seçil ÇOŞKUN	559–613
CONTEMPLATING TERRORISM UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTSCONTEMPLATING TERRORISM UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS	Duygu TAN	649–690
INSTITUTION OF AMICUS CURIAE (FRIEND OF COURT) IN FRENCH LAW	Nur BOLAYIR	803–833
THOUGHTS ON A SWISS FEDERAL COURT’S AWARD (TF 5A_236/2017, ATF 143 III 640) WITH REGARD ORAL WILL	Kadir Berk KAPANCI	913–930
CONDITIONS OF TERMINATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN RETURN TO LAND SHARE IN URBAN TRANSFORMATION BY ADMINISTRATIVE MEAN	Öz SEÇER	931–963
CAN A RIGHT “TO BE REPRESENTED IN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF A BANK” GRANTED WITH A SHAREHOLDERS’ AGREEMENT BE CONSIDERED AS “FRAUD AGAINST LAW”?