| Perkütan nefrolitotomi: İlk 76 renal ünitedeki erken sonuçlarımız | Not stated | 73–78 |
| Can we predict the response to medical treatment in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction? | M. İlteriş TEKİN,A. Muhteşem AĞILDERE,Ç. Levent PEŞKİRCİOĞLU,Y. Cem AYGÜN,Ayhan DİRİM,Hakan ÖZKARDEŞ | 79–82 |
| Indiana pouch as a choice of continent reservoir in exstrophia vesica patients with contracted bladders due to unsuccessful repairs | Cem AYGÜN,Serdar TEKGÜL,SEDAT ÖNER,Ali TEKİN,Ali ERGEN,Fevzi ÇAKMAK | 83–87 |
| Comparison of two different varicocelectomy techniques | İrfan ORHAN,Rahmi ONUR,Arslan ARDIÇOĞLU,İlhan GEÇİT,M. Kemal ATİKELER,Can BAYDİNÇ | 88–92 |
| Outcome of varicocelectomies done because of pain | Çetin DİNÇEL,Serhat KERMAN | 93–97 |
| The effect of urethral catheterisation on serum prostate specific antigen levels in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of a pilot study | M. Cemil UYGUR,Cenk YILMAZ,Haluk ÖZEN | 98–102 |
| The use of various reconstructive techniques in urinary undiversion | Ali TEKİN,Serdar TEKGÜL,Haluk ÖZEN,Mehmet BAKKALOĞLU,Cenk Y. BİLEN,Ali ERGEN,Ahmet ŞAHİN,Fevzi ÇAKMAK | 103–108 |
| The value of touch-prep cytology in testicular biopsy | A. Adil ESEN,Güven ASLAN,Meral KOYUNCUOĞLU,HATEM KAZIMOĞLU,İlhan ÇELEBİ | 109–111 |
| Periurethral teflon injection in female patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency | Bedrettin SEÇKİN,Yusuf KİBAR,Lütfü TAHMAZ,Serdar GÖKTAŞ,Doğan ERDURAN | 112–116 |
| Comparison of external and internal diversion methods in dismembered pyeloplasty operations for ureteropelvic junction obstructions | Kadir TÜRKÖLMEZ,Orhan GÖĞÜŞ,Murat BOZLU,Ergin SOYSAL,İlker SEÇKİNER,Yusuf Z. MÜFTÜOĞLU | 117–120 |
| Appendix vermiformis interposition in loss of proximal ureter due to blunt abdominal trauma | Emin BALKAN,Nizamettin KILIÇ,Hasan DOĞRUYOL | 121–123 |
| Primary urethral malignant melanoma: A case report | Cenk Y. BİLEN,Erim ERDEM,Gülçin ALTINOK,M. İlteriş TEKİN,Haluk ÖZEN |