Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Aggression Characteristics of Second Stage Primary School Students

İlköğretim II. Kademe Öğrencilerinin Saldırganlık Özellikleri

Pages
927–944
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the minimum (45) and the maximum (225) scores could be obtained from this scale, it can be asserted that students do exhibit aggressive behaviors to a certain extent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Within the scope of this study, aggression characteristics of second stage primary school students are intended to be analyzed from the aspect of different variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sample consists of 430 students randomly chosen out of the population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the minimum (45) and the maximum (225) scores could be obtained from this scale, it can be asserted that students do exhibit aggressive behaviors to a certain extent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İlköğretim öğrencileri · saldırganlık · Primary schools

Abstract

Within the scope of this study, aggression characteristics of second stage primary school students are intended to be analyzed from the aspect of different variables. Population of this study consists of all second stage primary school students studying in the districts and province center of Erzurum province, Turkey. Sample consists of 430 students randomly chosen out of the population. Data regarding aggression characteristics of students in this study was obtained through the Aggression Scale which was developed by Tuzgöl (1998). Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney U, t tests an done way variance analysis (ANOVA) were applied in analysis of the data. According to the findings, a significant difference was found between the scores of students who perceive parents’ attitudes as democratic and as protecting on behalf of the ones who perceive as democratic. However, there was no significant difference found between aggression scores of students from the aspect of the variables of age, gender, education status, parents’ being dead or alive, the settlement they live in, perceived academic success and having disciplinary punishment. Despite this insignificant difference found between the aggression scores of the students from the aspect of above mentioned variables –except for the variable of perceived parents attitudes- are still found to vary between 122-131. Considering the minimum (45) and the maximum (225) scores could be obtained from this scale, it can be asserted that students do exhibit aggressive behaviors to a certain extent.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ilköğretim II.kademe öğrencilerinin saldırganlık özellikleri çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini, Erzurum il merkezi ve ilçelerinde bulunan ilköğretim okullarının ikinci kademesinde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin tümü oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem, evrenden seçkisiz olarak belirlenen 430 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Araştırmada öğrencilerin saldırganlık özellikleri ile ilgili veriler, Tuzgöl (1998) tarafından geliştirilen Saldırganlık Ölçeği ile elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde, Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney U ve t testleri ile tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, ana-baba tutumlarını demokratik algılayanlarla koruyucu algılayanlar arasında demokratik algılayanların lehine anlamlı fark görülmüştür. Yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim şekli, annenin hayatta olması, babanın hayatta olması, yaşanılan yerleşim merkezi, algılanan akademik başarı ve disiplin cezası alıp almama değişkenleri açısından öğrencilerinin saldırganlık puanları arasında anlamlı faklılaşma görülmemiştir. Ana–baba tutumlarını demokratik ve koruyucu algılama değişkeninin dışındaki değişkenler açısından saldırganlık anlamlı ölçüde farklılaşmasa da, değişkenler için 122-131 arası saldırganlık puanları elde edilmiştir. Ölçekten alınabilecek minimum puan 45 maksimum puan 225 olduğu düşünüldüğünde öğrencilerinin belli düzeyde saldırganlıklarının olduğu saptanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLEKMEN, M., ADA, Ş., Alver, B. (2011). Aggression Characteristics of Second Stage Primary School Students. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 927–944. https://ajindex.com/articles/70474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (1)

  1. Alikaşifoğlu, M., Ercan, O., Erginöz, E., & Kaymak, D. A. (2004). Violent behavior among Turkish high school students and correlate of physical fighting. European Journal of Public Health, 14 (2), 173-177. Arriaga, P., Esteves, F., Carnerio, P., ve Monteiro, M. B. (2006), “Violent computer games and their effects on state hostility and physiological arousal.” Aggressive Behavior, 32, 146-158. Baron, R.A., Richardson, D.R.(1994). Human Aggression, 2. Edition, Plenum Pres, New York. Başcı Z. & Dilekmen, M. (2009). An analysis on classroom teachers’ attitudes towards corporal punishment from the aspects of several variables. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6 (7), 933-938. Benatar, D. (2002) Corparal Punishment. http://www.corpun.com/benatar.htm.12.10.2009 Chermack, S., Berman, M., & Taylor, S. (1997). Effects of provocation on emotions and aggression in males. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 1-10 Christophersen, E R. (1980). The pediatrician and parental discipline, Pediatrics, 66, 641-42. Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and socialpsychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722. Crothers, L.M., & Levinson, E. M. (2004). Assessment of bullying: a review of methods and instruments. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 496- 503. Deptula, D.P., & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: A comparison of their friendships. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 9, 75-104. Doğan, O., Spor Psikolojisi. Nobel Kitapevi. Adana, 2005. Efilti, E. 2006. “Ortaöğretim kurumlarında okuyan öğrencilerin saldırganlık ve denetim odağı’nın karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi”. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15 (1), 13-33. Freedman, J. C., Sears, D. O., Smith, C. M., Sosyal Psikoloji, İmge Kitabevi, 2. Baskı, Ankara, (Çev.: A. Dönmezer), 1993. Gelinas, D.J. (2003). “Witnessing violence: The effects on children and adolescents” (Part I pp. 38-54). ( Ed: Joshua Miller, Irene R. Martin ve Gerald Schamess) School violence and children in crisis: Community and school ınterventions for social workers and counselors. Denver: Love Publishing Company. Martin & G. Schamess (Eds.), School Violence And Children İn Crisis: Community And School İnterventions For Social Workers And Counselors. Denver: Love Publishing Company. Gini, G., Albie