Journals / Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Consientious Objection and International Law I: Internationalisation of a National Legal Problem Under a Dilemma of Fulfilling Public DutiesRespecting Religious Belief

Uluslararası Hukuk ve Vicdani Ret I: Ruhani İnanç-Kamusal Yükümlülük Dengesinde Vicdani Ret Ulusal Sorunsalının Uluslararasılaşması

Pages
27–48
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Final remarks refer to the internationalisation of national values under international law

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consientious Objection and International Law I: Internationalisation of a National Legal Problem Under a Dilemma of Fulfilling Public DutiesRespecting Religious BeliefT he analysis in this study is on the ethical dilemma of a citizen between a public duty arising from law and religious liberty provided to conscientious objector to military service.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It analysis the socio-historical evolution with special reference to civil disobedience-militarism analysis by Ronald Dworkin, who in 20th Century made an outstanding reference to literature with his masterpiece “Taking Rights Seriously”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Final remarks refer to the internationalisation of national values under international law
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vicdanı red · kamusal yükümlülük · ruhani inanç

Abstract

Consientious Objection and International Law I: Internationalisation of a National Legal Problem Under a Dilemma of Fulfilling Public DutiesRespecting Religious BeliefT he analysis in this study is on the ethical dilemma of a citizen between a public duty arising from law and religious liberty provided to conscientious objector to military service. The study encompasses the historical evolution of the concept of “conscientious objection” as a common value from Europa and United States where it became subject matter of positive law. The argument begins with ethical and epistemological parameters for a conscientious objector. It analysis the socio-historical evolution with special reference to civil disobedience-militarism analysis by Ronald Dworkin, who in 20th Century made an outstanding reference to literature with his masterpiece “Taking Rights Seriously”. Final remarks refer to the internationalisation of national values under international law

Özet

Bu çalışmada kamusal yükümlülükdinsel özgürlük ikileminde vicdani ret kurumu incelenmiştir. İlk kez bir ulusal yasa koyucu önüne Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde gelen, daha sonra Avrupa kıtasında da yüz yıllık süreçte farklı biçimlerde kabul edilen vicdani ret hakkına/özgürlüğüne ulusal hukuktan evrimleşen bir uluslararası toplum ortak değeri gözüyle bakıldığında görülenler, bu makalenin içeriğini oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca, kavrama etik ve epistemolojik bakışla yaklaşan çalışma sosyo-tarihsel gelişim sürecini incelemiştir. Son olarak 20. yüzyıla Hakları Ciddiye Almak eseriyle damga vuran Ronald Dworkinin konuyu zorunlu askerlik ve sivil itaatsizlik çerçevesinde değerlendirmesine de atıf yapan çalışma ulusal değerlerin uluslararasılaşması süreci çerçevesinde bir sonuç değerlendirmesi yapmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUTLU, E. İ. (2022). Consientious Objection and International Law I: Internationalisation of a National Legal Problem Under a Dilemma of Fulfilling Public DutiesRespecting Religious Belief. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 27–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/528831

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ACKERLY, A BROOK, Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference, 2008,
  2. Cambridge, AGAZZI, Evandro, Man and Nature in Ethics, Ionna Kuçuradi Çağın olayları Arasında (Der. B.Çotuksöken vd.), Tarihçi Kitabevi, İstanbul 2014
  3. ANONYMUS, Citizens and Citizenship- Naturalization –Exemption from Military Service Oath on Basis of Religious Belief Upheld (IN re Hansen, 148 F. Supp.187 (D.Minn.1957)), St. John’s Law Review Issue 1 Vol:32, December 1957, Number 1 Article 13 ATATÜRK, Mustafa Kemal, Zabit ve Kumandan ile Hasbihal, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları,9. Baskı,2011
  4. BAŞKENT, Can, Vicdani Ret Yazıları, Federe Yayınları, 2010,
  5. BERDAK, Olivia, Who owns your body: Conscientious Objectors in Croatia in1990s, Polemos 16 (2013) 1 s.37-51, [internet] hrcak.srce.hr/file/166702 erişim tarihi: 2.11.2014
  6. BROCK, Peter, Pacifism in Europe, to 1914,
  7. Princeton University Press,
  8. BRÖCKLING, Ulrich, 21. Yüzyılın Başında Vicdani Red, ÇINAR/ÜSTERCİ Çarklardaki Kum: Vicdani Red, Düşünsel kaynaklar ve Deneyimler (2009) içinde, s.71 CARNAHAN, Tara J, The Quakers and Contentious Objection, Historia 2011 Vol 20, s 2. http://castle.eiu. edu/historia/archives/2011/2011Journal.pdf erişim tarihi: 28.10.2014
  9. COHEN, Carl, Conscentious Objection, Ethics, An International Journal of Social, Political and Legal Philosophy, Vol 78 No.4 July,1968 http://carl-cohen.org/docs/Conscientious%20Objection.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:2.11.2014
  10. DWORKIN, Ronald, Hakları Ciddiye Almak, çev: A.Ulvi Türkbağ, Dost, 2009
  11. GUSE, Felix, Die Kaukasusfront im Weltkrieg bis zum Frieden von Brest, Zürcher,a.g.e’den naklen, s.66 HUNTER, Edward, Constitutional Law-Religious Belief Necessary for Conscientious Objector Exemption, Louisiana Law Review, Vol.26 No.1 Aralık 1965
  12. MAY, Larry, Crimes Against Humanity, A Normative Account, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law, 2004
  13. NAL, Sabahattin, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Türk Hukukunda Vicdani Ret, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2010, cilt 7 sayı 13, s. 252 SANDERS, Liman Von: Fünf Jahre Türkei, Berlin 1920, s.241; Zürcher, a.g.e ‘den naklen s.65 SCHINKEL, Anders, Conscious and Conscientious Objections, Amsterdam University Press, 2007
  14. SCHOWALTER, Dennis, 1815-1864 Avrupa’nın Savaş Tarzı, Dretnot, Tank ve Uçak; Modern Çağda Savaş Sanatı 1815-2000 (Çev: Yavuz Alogan) s.40,Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul,2003
  15. TREBLE, H. A / KING K.M. Everyday Life in Rome in the time of Caesar and Cicero, 1966, 13. Basım, Oxford, Clarendon Press ZÜRCHER, Erick Jan,