Journals / Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Conscientious Objection and International Law II: Interpreting the Convention in the Light of Bayatyan

Vicdani Ret ve Uluslararası Hukuk II: Sözleşmeyi Bayatyanla Okumak

Pages
49–72
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The approach interpreting the Convention as a Renaissance of Natural Law and overriding any other value to save the public liberty of individual will be discussed re-evaluating Bayatyan decision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, an activist approach on interpretation of treaties in terms of religious liberty will be discussed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:General interpretation rules of positive law will be considered with reference to interpretation method applied to European Convention on Human Rights by European Court of Human Rights.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The approach interpreting the Convention as a Renaissance of Natural Law and overriding any other value to save the public liberty of individual will be discussed re-evaluating Bayatyan decision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, an activist approach on interpretation of treaties in terms of religious liberty will be discussed. General interpretation rules of positive law will be considered with reference to interpretation method applied to European Convention on Human Rights by European Court of Human Rights. The approach interpreting the Convention as a Renaissance of Natural Law and overriding any other value to save the public liberty of individual will be discussed re-evaluating Bayatyan decision.

Özet

Bu çalışmada uluslararası sözleşme hukukunun din özgürlüğü ile ilgili düzenlemesinin aktivist bir yorumla baskılanması üzerine bir tartışma yaratılmak istenmiştir. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi'nin bu Sözleşme'yi yorumlama şekli üzerine yapılan birçok çalışmada yapıldığı üzere pozitif hukukun genel kurallarına da atıf yapılacaktır. Sözleşmeyi doğal hukukun rönesansı çerçevesinde yorumlayan ve bireysel özgürlüğü her şeyin üzerinde gören yaklaşım uluslararası hukuk ilkeleri çerçevesinde Bayatyan kararını yeniden okumak suretiyle tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUTLU, E. İ. (2022). Conscientious Objection and International Law II: Interpreting the Convention in the Light of Bayatyan. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 49–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/528833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. BAŞKENT, Can, Vicdani Ret Yazıları, Federe Yayınları, 2010
  2. CALO, Z.R: Pluralism, Secularisma and the European Court of Human Rights, Journal of Law and Religion,Vol:XXVI,p:106 CALO, Zachary R, Constructing the Secular: Law and Religion Jurisprudence in Europe and the United States, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, Working Papers. CLAPHAM, Andrew, Human Rights: A very Short Introduction, Oxford, 2007.
  3. DWORKIN, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press,1978.
  4. GÖZLER, Kemal, Anayasa Hukukunda Metodoloji, Ekin, Bursa, 2013.
  5. NOZICK, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, 2013
  6. MARTINEZ, Jenny S, The Slave Trade and the Origins of International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, 2012, s. 13 SCHNABLY, Stephen / RICHARD,Wilson / SIMON, Jonathan / TUSHNET, Mark, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Treaties, Cases and Analysis, Cambridge, 2006.