SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg. / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Surface coatings of dental implants

Dental implantlarda yüzey kaplamaları

B. Cem ŞENER
Özgen GÖKTAY
AHMET HAMDİ ARSLAN
Binnaz YORUÇ
Pages
139–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article reviews recent study results in the literature and tries to profile the future aspect of coating materials and methods of dental implants to address a new target for following studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Physical and biochemical properties of dental implants have an important role on their success rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Previous experiences showed that success rate proportionally increases with surface porosity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article reviews recent study results in the literature and tries to profile the future aspect of coating materials and methods of dental implants to address a new target for following studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dental implantasyon · Yüzey özellikleri · Dental implantlar

Abstract

Physical and biochemical properties of dental implants have an important role on their success rate. Previous experiences showed that success rate proportionally increases with surface porosity. Therefore, porous surface is mandatoiy for success. Moreover, recent efforts are focused on surface coating materials and methods to enhance biologic behavior of the implant material. This article reviews recent study results in the literature and tries to profile the future aspect of coating materials and methods of dental implants to address a new target for following studies.

Özet

Dental implantlann fiziksel ve biyokimyasal özellikleri basarı oranlan üzerinde önemli bir role sahiptir. Yapılan daha önceki çalışmalar göstermiştir ki, yüzey porözlülüğü arttıkça başarı oranı da artmaktadır. Bundan dolayı poröz yüzey başarı için vazgeçilemez bir unsurdur. Bunun yanı sıra, günümüzdeki çalışmalar implant materyallerinin biyolojik özelliklerini iyileştirmek için yüzey kaplama materyalleri ve metotları üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. Bu makalede literatürdeki son zamanlarda yapılan çalışma sonuçları derlenerek; gelecekteki çalışmalara hedefler belirleyerek implant kaplama materyal ve metotlarının gelecekteki durumunun profili çıkarılmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, B. C., GÖKTAY, Ö., ARSLAN, A. H., YORUÇ, B. (2006). Surface coatings of dental implants. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Diş Hekimliği Derg., Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 139–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/293195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Bobbio A. The first endosseous alloplastic implant in the history of man. Bull Hist Dent. 1972; 20:1-6
  2. Muratori G. Isotopy and multicorticality: two fundamental principles. Dent Cadmos. 1991; 59: 17-22
  3. Dahl G. History of intramucosal inserts. J Oral Implantol. 1991; 17: 440
  4. Paoleschi C. New aspects of pin implantation: a new system of implantation and a new type of pontic on an artificial resin die implant, completely isolated from the oral environment Dent. Cadmos. 1971; 39: 1707-23
  5. Chercheve R, Chercheve M. The thin-crest implant. Inf Dent. 1967; 49: 511-5
  6. Linkow LI. The versatility of implant interventions. Dent Concepts. 1966; 10: 5-17
  7. Linkow LI. Prefabricated endosseous implant prostheses. Dent Concepts. 1967; 10: 210
  8. Scortecci GM, Crousillat J, Foesser P, et al. The implant denture in the laboratory. Cah Prothese. 1989; 67: 88-103
  9. Vahey JW, Simonian PT, Conrad EU. Carcinogenecity and metallic implants. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 24: 319-24
  10. Arvidoen K, Cottier- Fox M, Frieberg V. Cytotoxic effects of Co-Cr alloys on fibroblast derived form human gingiva. Scand J Dent Res. 1986; 95: 356-63
  11. Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Occupational health problems and adverse patient reactions in orthodontics. Euro J Orthodon. 1989; 11:254-64
  12. Sun ZL, Wataha JC, Hanks CT. Effects of metal ions on osteoblasl -like cell metabolism and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997; 34: 29-37
  13. Babbush CA. Dental Implants: Principles & Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991, 78-81
  14. De Maeztu MA, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. Ion implantation: surface treatment for improving the bone integration of titanium and Tİ6A14V dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003; 14: 57-62
  15. Steflik DE, Corpe RS, Lake FT, et al. Ultrastructural analyses oi the attachment (bonding) zone between bone and implanted biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 39: 611-20
  16. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, et al. Influence of implan! diameters on the integraion of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 26: 141-8
  17. Arthur B, Sergio LS, Paulo T, et al. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp. 2002; 17: 377-83
  18. Locci P, Lilli C, Marinucci M, et âl. In vitro cytotoxic effects of orthodontic appliances. J Biomed Mater Res. (Appl. Biomater.) 2000; 53: 56