Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 1997 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Effect of oral hygiene on methotrexate + 5fluorouracil induced oral side effects

Metotreksat + 5florourasil kombinasyonuna bağlı gelişen oral yan etkileri önlemede ağız hijyeninin etkisi

Pages
55–61
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the patients, to whom the oral hygiene was instructed, the objective and subjective oral mucositis indexes and the ot¬her local scores reduced significantly, and recovered in a shorter period when compared with the control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Oral mucositis, which is a common side-effect of most anti¬neoplastic agents, occur especially due to methotrexate (MTX) + 5fluorouracil (5FU) usage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this comparative clinical study, effect of oral hygiene on development oj MTX+5FU-induced oral mucositis was investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the patients, to whom the oral hygiene was instructed, the objective and subjective oral mucositis indexes and the ot¬her local scores reduced significantly, and recovered in a shorter period when compared with the control group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Oral mucositis, which is a common side-effect of most anti¬neoplastic agents, occur especially due to methotrexate (MTX) + 5fluorouracil (5FU) usage. In this comparative clinical study, effect of oral hygiene on development oj MTX+5FU-induced oral mucositis was investigated. Thirty patients undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy with MTX-5FU combination were icluded to this study. Pri¬or the chemotherapy standart oral hygiene was instructed to 15 to these patients and they were also motivated during the ir therapy. The rest 15 were the control group. On predeter¬mined criteria basis all the patients were followed-up du¬ring their therapy. Differences between the results of both groups were evaluated statistically. According to the results, the patients, to whom the oral hygiene was instructed, the objective and subjective oral mucositis indexes and the ot¬her local scores reduced significantly, and recovered in a shorter period when compared with the control group.

Özet

Çoğu antineoplastik ajanların yaygın yanetkilerinden biri olan oral mukositis kanser kemoterapisinde en sık metotreksat (MTX)+5florourasil (5FU)'e bağlı olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu karşılaştırmalı klinik çalışmada MTX+5FU kullanımına bağlı olarak gelişen oral muko-sitisin ortaya çıkışını önelemede ağız bakımının etkisi araştırılmıştır. MTX+5FU ile antineoplastik kemotera-pi alan 30 hasta çalışma için seçildi. 15 kişiye kemotera¬pi öncesi standart bir ağız bakımı protokolü verilerek, tedavileri sırasında hijyen motivasyonları yapıldı. Geri kalan 15 kişi kontrol grubuydu. Tedavileri sırasında tüm hastalar belirli günlerde kontrol edilerek çeşitli kriterler bazmda değerlendirildi, iki grup arasında is¬tatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farkın olup, olmadığı ince¬lendi. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, ağız bakımı yapan hasta grubunda kontrol grubuna oranla hem objektif, hem de sübjektif oral mukositis indekslerinde ve diğer bulgularda anlamlı bir azalma ve daha kısa süre içeri¬sinde değerlerde düzelme olduğu bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, B. C., TUNCER, M., BALTALI, E. (2022). Effect of oral hygiene on methotrexate + 5fluorouracil induced oral side effects. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 55–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/552906

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Addy M. Jenkins S. Newcombe R: The effect of some Chlorhexidine containig mouthrinses on salivary bacterial counts.y Clin Periodonotol 1991:18:90-3 2. Akova M: Kanserli hastalarda infeksiyon hastalıklarının tedavi ilkeleri: Ateşli nötropenik hastalarda antimikrobiyal tedavi. Antibiyotoik Bülteni 1994:4fİJ:10-6 3. Caiman, KC, Smyth JF, Tattersall MHN: Basic prinsiples of cancer chemotherapy. 1st ed. Glascow: British Co., 1980:103-12 4. Carpentieri U, Haggard ME, Lockhart LH, et al. Clinical experience in prevention of coandidiasis by nystatin in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Pediatr 1978:92: 593-5 5. Carter SK, Bakowsky MT, Hellmann K: Chemotherapy of cancer. 2nd cd. New York: Wiley Medical Pub., 1981:358. 6. Chabner BA: Clinical strategies for cancer treatment: The role of drugs. In: Chabner BA, ColIinsJM, ed: Cancer chemotherapy: Principles and practice, 1st ed. Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott Comp., 1990: 1-15 7. Condit PT, Channes RE, Joel W: Renal txqicity of methotrexate. Cancer 1969: 25:126-31 8. Dent RG, McColl I: 5-Fluorouracil and angina. Lancet 1975:8:347-8. 9. Dreizen S: Stomatotoooxic manifestatins ofcancer chcmtherapy./fVosi/ıeföeiiÎİ978: 40(5): 650-5. 10. Epstein JB, Vickars L, Spinelli J, Reece D: Efficiacy of chlrhexidine and nystatin rinses in prevention of oral complications in leukemia and bone marrow transplantation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992: 73:682-9. 11. Fossa SD, Aamdal S: Toxicity of combined chemotherapy in clinical oncology. In: Horwich A, ed: Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy in clinical oncology. 1st ed. London: Adivision of Hodder & Stughtn, 1992: 35-9. 12. Guggeneimer J, Verbin RS, Appel BN, Schmutz J: Clinicopathologic effects of cancer chemtherapeutic agents n human buccal mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977:44(1): 58-62. 13. Hahn IM, Corrİgham R, Keaney M, et al. Ketoconazole versus nystatin plus amphotericin B for fungal prophylaxis in severely immuncompromized patients. Lancet 1982:./0:826-9. 14. Heit W, Gischer H, Frickhofcn N: Drug-induced agranulsitsis: Evidence for the commitment of bone marrow haematopoiesis. Scand J Haematol 1985:35:459-68 15. Lockhart PB, Sonis ST: Relationship of oral complications to peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts in patients receiving career chemotherapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979:48:21-8. 16. O'Sullivan EA, Duggal Ms, Bailey CC, et al. Changes in the oral microflora during cytotxic chemtherapy in children being treated fr acute