KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

ChatGPT’nin Üçüncü Dil olarak Almanca Dersinde Kelime Öğrenimine Etkisi

The Impact of ChatGPT on Vocabulary Learning in L3 German Class

Muhammet Yaşar Yüzlü(ZONGULDAK BULENT ECEVİT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5377-7329
Sayfa
339–348
Yayın Tarihi
2024-08-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, katılımcıların akademik başarılarına dair bilişsel ve duyuşsal boyutlar aracılığıyla içgörüler sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Teknoloji, uygulamalı dilbilim alanında yerleşik bir konu olmasına rağmen, sohbet robotlarının, özellikle ChatGPT’ nin dil öğrenimine, bilhassa üçüncü dil (L3) öğrenimine dahil edilmesi yeni ve gizemli bir konudur.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu ilişkiyi aydınlatmak amacıyla, mevcut çalışma ChatGPT’nin L3 Almanca dersinde dilin temel yapı taşı olan kelime öğrenimini geliştirmedeki rolünü araştırmaktadır çünkü çok dillilik günümüzde bir norm haline gelmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, katılımcıların akademik başarılarına dair bilişsel ve duyuşsal boyutlar aracılığıyla içgörüler sunmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:ChatGPT · Kelime öğrenimi · Üçüncü dil olarak Almanca

Özet

Teknoloji, uygulamalı dilbilim alanında yerleşik bir konu olmasına rağmen, sohbet robotlarının, özellikle ChatGPT’ nin dil öğrenimine, bilhassa üçüncü dil (L3) öğrenimine dahil edilmesi yeni ve gizemli bir konudur. Bu ilişkiyi aydınlatmak amacıyla, mevcut çalışma ChatGPT’nin L3 Almanca dersinde dilin temel yapı taşı olan kelime öğrenimini geliştirmedeki rolünü araştırmaktadır çünkü çok dillilik günümüzde bir norm haline gelmektedir. Bu keşfedici nitel durum çalışmasının katılımcıları, A1 seviyesinde Almanca öğrenen üç üniversite öğrencisidir. Katılımcılar, beş hafta boyunca ChatGPT tarafından oluşturulmuş beş farklı metni okur ve analiz eder, ardından tema ile ilintili anahtar kelimeleri dahil ettikleri metinlerin konusunu ChatGPT aracılığıyla kendilerine uyarlarlar. Veri, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler, kelime bilgisi testleri ve yansıtıcı günlükler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verileri analiz etmek için gömülü teori kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, katılımcıların akademik başarılarına dair bilişsel ve duyuşsal boyutlar aracılığıyla içgörüler sunmaktadır. Pedagojik çıkarımlar irdelenmiştir.

Abstract

Although technology is an established issue in applied linguistics, integrating chatbots, particularly ChatGPT into language learning, especially third-language (L3) learning, is a novel and mystic issue. To demystify this integration, the current study explores the role of ChatGPT in enhancing vocabulary learning, which makes up the skeleton of language, in L3 German class since multilingualism is becoming a norm nowadays. The participants of this exploratory qualitative case study, who are A1-level German learners, are three university students. They read and analyse five different ChatGPT-created texts and adapt the topic of texts to themselves via ChatGPT in which they are supposed to incorporate theme-related keywords throughout five weeks. Data is gathered through semi-structured interviews, vocabulary tests, and reflective journals. Grounded theory was conducted to analyse the data. The findings provide insights into the participants’ academic achievement through cognitive and affective dimensions. Pedagogical implications are discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yüzlü, M. Y. (2024). ChatGPT’nin Üçüncü Dil olarak Almanca Dersinde Kelime Öğrenimine Etkisi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1417301

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (44)

  1. Abbott, J. (2000). ‘Blinking out’ and ‘having the touch’: Two fifthgrade boys talk about flow experiences in writing. Written Communication, 17(1), 53-92.
  2. Ashfaque, M. W., Tharewal, S., Iqhbal, S., & Kayte, C. N. (2020, October). A Review on Techniques, Characteristics and Approaches to an Intelligent Tutoring Chatbot System. In 2020 International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC) (pp. 258– 262). IEEE
  3. Ballance, O. J. (2024). Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi-experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation. ReCALL, 36(1), 58-71. doi:10.1017/S0958344023000162
  4. Bin-Hady, W. R. A., Al-Kadi, A., Hazaea, A., & Ali, J. K. M. (2023). Exploring the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: a global perspective. Library of High Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2023-0200
  5. Charmaz K. (2011) Grounded theory methods in Social Justice research. In N. K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds). Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry (pp.291-331). London: Sage.
  6. Cresswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London: Sage.
  7. Crosthwaite, P., & Baisa, V. (2023). Generative AI and the end of corpus-assisted data-driven learning? Not so fast!. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 3, 1-4 100066. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j. acorp.2023.100066
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The future of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness (pp. 364-383). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  11. Çakmak, F. (2022). Chatbot-Human Interaction and Its Effects on EFL Students› L2 Speaking Performance and Anxiety. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 16(2), 113-131.
  12. Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(5), 549-586.
  13. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York: McGram-Hill Companies.
  14. Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279-289. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023
  15. Fu, Q.-K., Zou, D., Xie, H. & Cheng, G. (2022) A review of AWE feedback: Types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787
  16. Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13-21.
  17. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5-24. http://doi.org/10125/73474
  18. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  19. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbotsupported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10. 1111/jcal.12610
  20. Jia, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z., & Ruan, M. (2012). Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers & Education, 58(1), 63-76.
  21. Jiang H, Cheng Y, Yang J, et al. (2022) AI-powered chatbot communication with customers: dialogic interactions, satisfaction, engagement, and customer behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 134, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107329
  22. Kim, N. Y. (2018a). Chatbots and Korean EFL Students’ English Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(2), 1-7.
  23. Kim, N. Y. (2018b). A Study on Chatbots for Developing Korean College Students’ English Listening and Reading Skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), 19-26.
  24. Kim, N. Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H. S. (2019). Future English learning: Chatbots and artificial intelligence. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 32-53.
  25. Kim, H., Yang, H., Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Design principles and architecture of a second language learning chatbot. Language Learning & Technology 26(1), 1–18. http://hdl.handle. net/10125/73463
  26. Kohnke, L. (2022). A qualitative exploration of student perspectives of chatbot use during emergency remote teaching. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 16(4), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.125966
  27. Kohnke, L. (2023a). A pedagogical chatbot: A supplemental language learning tools. RELC Journal. 54(3), 828-838. https://doi. org/10.1177/00336882211067054
  28. Kohnke, L. (2023b). L2 learners’ perceptions of a chatbot as a potential independent language learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 17(1/2), 214–226. https://doi. org/10.1504/IJMLO.2023.128339
  29. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
  30. Lee, J. H., Yang, H., Shin, D., & Kim, H. (2020). Chatbots. ELT Journal, 74(3), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa035
  31. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How Languages Are Learned (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Lin, M. P. C., & Chang, D. (2020). Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 78-92.
  33. Lincoln, Y. G., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Newberry Park.
  34. Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.20 23.2240316
  35. Marek, M. W. & Wu, W.-C. V. (2014) Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 560–578. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09588221.2013.776969
  36. Marr, A. J. (2001). In the zone: A biobehavioral theory of the flow experience. Athletic Insight, The Online Journal of Sport Psychology. Elektronische Ressource: http://www.athleticinsight. com/ Vol3Iss1/Commentary.html
  37. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the “Q” out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality and Quantity, 39(3), 267-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135- 004-1670-0.
  38. Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1549– 1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22326
  39. Seligman, M.E.P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5–14.
  40. Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2020.103862
  41. Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford press.
  42. Wang, Y. F., Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2017). VILLAGE—Virtual immersive language learning and gaming environment: immersion and presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 431- 450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12388
  43. Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). A review of chatbot-assisted learning: pedagogical approaches, implementations, factors leading to effectiveness, theories, and future directions. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2202704
  44. Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). A review of chatbot-assisted learning: pedagogical approaches, implementations, factors leading to effectiveness, theories, and future directions. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2202704