AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightAt this point, firstly, we encounter with Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s Benthamite, predictive, fallibilist, empricist and pragmatical philosophy of law in the context of generel theory of Common Law; and soon after with Benjamin Nathan Cardozo’s pragmatical and sociological philosophy of adjudication in his book, “The Nature of Judicial Process”
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Holmes and CardozoI n this article we will try to illustrate the pragmatist nature of American jurisprudence in the the last period of nineteenth century and the early period of twentieth century. This historical stage in American jurisprudential history was shaped by monopolist capitalism and entellectual neccecities for a new social philosophy for the new social and economical circumstances in the United States. This was different from natural law philosophy compatible with the founder political philosophy of United States, and had anti-Blackstonian character. At this point, firstly, we encounter with Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s Benthamite, predictive, fallibilist, empricist and pragmatical philosophy of law in the context of generel theory of Common Law; and soon after with Benjamin Nathan Cardozo’s pragmatical and sociological philosophy of adjudication in his book, “The Nature of Judicial Process”
Özet
Bu makalede ondokuzuncu yüzyılın sonu ve yirminci yüzyılın başındaki Amerikan hukuk felsefesinin pragmatist tabiatını göstermeye çalışacağız. Amerikan hukuk felsefesi tarihinin bu evresi, tekelci kapitalizmce ve Birleşik Devletler’deki yeni sosyoekonomik koşullar için yeni bir sosyal felsefe bulma hususundaki entelektüel ihtiyaçlarca şekillenmiştir. Bu da Birleşik Devletler’in doğal hukukçu kurucu siyaset felsefesinden farklı ve Blacstone-karşıtı bir karakterde olmuştur. İşte bu noktada ilk olarak karşımıza Oliver Wendell Holmes’un Common Law’un genel teorisi biçimindeki Benthamcı, yanılabilirci, emprisist ve pragmatik hukuk felsefesi çıkar; ve hemen ardından da Benjamin Nathan Cardozo’nun “The Nature of Judicial Process” kitabındaki pragmatik ve sosyolojik karar verme felsefesi ile karşılaşırız.