SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Post-Modern Kent Fikrinin Diyalektiği: Alegori, Tarih, Hafıza ve Esnek Birikim

The Dialectics of Post-Modern Urbanism: Allegory, History, Memory, and Flexible Accumulation

Sinan Tankut GÜLHAN
Pages
1017–1028
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The first set is related to the reproduction of knowledge and power, and the second set foregrounds the break within the dialectical paradigm that defined the experience of modernity, i.e. memory

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This essay examines theoretical and rhetorical appurtenances exposed by the rupture inherent in the historico/geographical phenomenon known as postmodernism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Traversing the barrier between academic writings and discursive meanderings of a wide variety of the proponents, as well as critiques of postmodern urbanism, I intend to locate the place of postmodern problematic in a dialectical impasse.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first set is related to the reproduction of knowledge and power, and the second set foregrounds the break within the dialectical paradigm that defined the experience of modernity, i.e. memory
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This essay examines theoretical and rhetorical appurtenances exposed by the rupture inherent in the historico/geographical phenomenon known as postmodernism. Traversing the barrier between academic writings and discursive meanderings of a wide variety of the proponents, as well as critiques of postmodern urbanism, I intend to locate the place of postmodern problematic in a dialectical impasse. The essay forays into the allegorical nature of postmodern urbanism and extends a critical gaze to the earlier debates surrounding postmodernism. In this paper, it is argued that to two sets of questions need to be dealt with before coming up with a successful refutation of postmodernism. The first set is related to the reproduction of knowledge and power, and the second set foregrounds the break within the dialectical paradigm that defined the experience of modernity, i.e. memory

Özet

Bu makale postmodernizm adıyla tanınan tarihsel/coğrafi fenomenler bütününün esasında ürünü olduğu kırılmanın ve inkîtanın kuramsal ve retorik tartışmalarını inceler. Akademik tartışmalar ve postmodern kent düşüncesinin diskursif kurucu metinlerinde belirlenen safları ve muarızları takip ederek mahut bir sınır fikrini aşmayı hedefleyen bu yazıda, zıt kutupların doğduğu ve hepsinin kökenini teşkil eden mekân fikri ele alınmaktadır. Postmodern kent fikrinin alegorik doğasına ve postmodernizmin neşet ettiği bu doğanın erken tartışmalarına dair eleştirel bir bakışa dayanan yazı, öncelikle bilgi ve iktidar sorunun bir problematik kümesi olarak ele alır. Bunun üzerinden ise, modernlik tecrübesini sınayan mekânsal bir ürün olan hafızanın inşasını bir diğer sorunsal kümesi olarak tasvir eder

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLHAN, S. T. (2022). Post-Modern Kent Fikrinin Diyalektiği: Alegori, Tarih, Hafıza ve Esnek Birikim. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 1017–1028. https://ajindex.com/articles/519140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Althusser, Louis. Essays on Ideology. London: Verso, 1984. ------. For Marx. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso, 1977.
  2. Anderson, Perry. Considerations on Western Marxism. London: Verso, 1976.
  3. Bender, John. Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind Ineighteenth-Century England, 1719-1779.
  4. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  5. Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
  6. Benjamin, Walter, and Peter Demetz. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writing. New York: Schocken Books, 1986.
  7. Berman, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking Penguin, 1988.
  8. Bhabha, H. K., and H. K. Bhadha. The Location of Culture: Routledge, 1994.
  9. Borges, J. L., and N. T. Di Giovanni. The Aleph and Other Stories, 1933-1969: Pan Books [ua], 1973.
  10. Boyer, Christine M. The City of Collective Memory: Its Historical Imagery and Architectural Entertainments. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1994. ------. Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1983.
  11. Castells, Manuel. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. [English-language ed, Social Structure and Social Change. London: Edward Arnold, 1977.
  12. Davis, Mike. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London; New York: Verso, 1990. ------. Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. 1st ed. New York: Metropolitan Books, 1998. ------. Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the Us City. London; New York: Verso, 2000. ------. Planet of Slums. London; New York: Verso, 2006. ------. "Urban Renaissance and the Spirit of Postmodernism." New Left Review 151 (1985).
  13. Dear, Michael J. The Postmodern Urban Condition: Blackwell Publishing, 2000. ------. "The Premature Demise of Postmodern Urbanism." Cultural Anthropology 6, no. 4 (1991): 538 ------. "Postmodernism and Planning." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4, no. 3 (1986): 84. Dear, Michael J., and Steven Flusty. "Postmodern Urbanism." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, no. 1 (1998): 50-72.
  14. Ellin, Nan. The Postmodern Urbanism. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996.
  15. Foucault, Michel, and Colin Gordon. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972 1977
  16. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980.
  17. Harvey, David "Cosmopolitanism and the Banality of Geographical Evils." Public Culture