SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57

EDUCATION AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: A REGIONAL EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

EĞİTİM VE YOKSULLUKLA MÜCADELE: TÜRKİYE’DEN BÖLGESEL BİR KANIT

İrem ÇETİN
Pages
131–144
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the empirical results demonstrate that tertiary education has a higher effect in comparison with secondary education in reducing poverty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we investigated the long-run role of education on poverty alleviation using the sub-national data of Turkey from 2008 to 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly, we explore the cointegration properties of the data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the empirical results demonstrate that tertiary education has a higher effect in comparison with secondary education in reducing poverty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the long-run role of education on poverty alleviation using the sub-national data of Turkey from 2008 to 2018. Firstly, we explore the cointegration properties of the data. Secondly, we estimate the long-run relationship between education and poverty by employing the Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) estimators. Thirdly, we reveal the direction of causality. We find that secondary and tertiary education help to eliminate sub-national poverty in Turkey. Moreover, the empirical results demonstrate that tertiary education has a higher effect in comparison with secondary education in reducing poverty.

Özet

Çalışmada, Türkiye’de eğitimin yoksullukla mücadeledeki uzun dönemli rolü 2008-2018yılları arasındaki bölgesel düzeydeki veriler kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, öncelikleverilerin eş bütünleşme özellikleri incelenmiştir. İkinci olarak, eğitim ile yoksulluk arasındaki uzundönemli ilişki Tam Değiştirilmiş En Küçük Kareler ve Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemlerikullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Üçüncü olarak nedenselliğin yönü ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada,ortaöğretim ve yükseköğretimin Türkiye’de bölgesel yoksulluğu azaltmaya katkı sağladığısonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, yükseköğretimin yoksulluğuazaltma üzerindeki etkisi ortaöğretimden daha fazladır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, İ. (2022). EDUCATION AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: A REGIONAL EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57, 131–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/503422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adekoya, O. (2018). Impact of human capital development on poverty alleviation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 7(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/ 10.4172/2162- 6359.1000544 Baltagi, B. and Kao, C. (2000). Nonstationary Panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: a survey. (Badi Baltagi Eds.). Advances in econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels içinde (s.7-51).
  2. New York, NY: Elsevier. Becker, G. S. (1965). Human capital and poverty alleviation. Human Resource and Operation Policy Working Paper, No. 52. Besley, T. and Burgess, R. (2003). Having global poverty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/089533003769204335 Bhukuth, A., Roumane, A. and Terrany, B. (2018). Cooperative, human capital and poverty: a theoretical framework. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/1
  3. Brown, P. and James, D. (2020). Educational expansion, poverty reduction and social mobility: Reframing the debate. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101537
  4. Chen, B., McCoskey, S. And Kao, C. (1999). Estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data: a Monte Carlo Study. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 19, 75–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.1999.10737475
  5. Chikelu, J. C. (2016). Impact of human capital development on poverty reduction in Nigeria. MPRA Paper, No: 74696. De Silva, I. and Sumarto, S. (2015). Dynamics of growth, poverty and human capital: evidence from Indonesian sub-national data. Journal of Economic Development, 40(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2015.40.2.001
  6. Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000
  7. Engle, R. and Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-76. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1913236 Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  8. Kao, C. and Chen, B. (1995). On the estimation and inference for cointegration in panel data when the cross-section and time-series dimensions are comparable. Manuscript, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University. Erişim Adresi: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/do