Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 4

Jurisdiction Of International Court Of Justice And Treaty Bodies

ULUSLARARASI ADALET DİVANININ YARGI YETKİSİ VE TREATY BODİES

Pages
3199–3215
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article evaluates and instantiates with human rights conventions the necessity of exhaustion of control mechanism that assumed in human rights conventions within the context of jurisdiction of International Court of Justice in Statute of the International Court of Justice article 36 paragraph 2 or agreement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Universal human rights conventions are taken as a basis for decisions and advisory judgement of International Court of Justice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Universal human rights conventions are taken as a basis for decisions and advisory judgement of International Court of Justice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article evaluates and instantiates with human rights conventions the necessity of exhaustion of control mechanism that assumed in human rights conventions within the context of jurisdiction of International Court of Justice in Statute of the International Court of Justice article 36 paragraph 2 or agreement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Universal human rights conventions are taken as a basis for decisions and advisory judgement of International Court of Justice. This article evaluates and instantiates with human rights conventions the necessity of exhaustion of control mechanism that assumed in human rights conventions within the context of jurisdiction of International Court of Justice in Statute of the International Court of Justice article 36 paragraph 2 or agreement.

Özet

Evrensel nitelikli insan hakları sözleşmeleri günümüzde Uluslararası Adalet Divanı'nın kararlarına ve danışma görüşlerine esas olmaktadır. Makalede Uluslararası Adalet Divanı'nın anlaşmaya yahut uluslararası Adalet Divanı statüsünün 36.madde, 2.fıkrasına istinat eden yargı yetkisini kullanması bakımından insan hakları sözleşmelerinde öngörülen denetim mekanizmasının tüketilmesinin gerekip gerekmediği hususu insan hakları sözleşmeleri örneklerinde ele alınmış ve değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSAVA, A. F. (2016). Jurisdiction Of International Court Of Justice And Treaty Bodies. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 4, 3199–3215. https://ajindex.com/articles/150031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Andreas Zimmermann Deutschland und die obligatorische Gerichtsbarkeit des internationalen Gerichtshofes, ZRP 2006 Kamleshwar DasUnited Nations Institutions and Procedures Founded on Conventions on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, bknz.: Karel Vasak (Hrsg.), The International Dimensions of Human Rights, Bd.1, 1982 Manfred Nowak/The United Nations Convention Against Torture - A Elisabeth McArthur Commentary, 2008