SavedAdd your journal

Journals / NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

SMART CITIES AND THE DIGITAL EVOLUTION OF CRIME

AKILLI KENTLER VE SUÇUN DİJİTAL EVRİMİ

Mert Erekmekçi(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, SOSYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7165-8884
Pages
207–224
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the study reveals the processes of manipulating the digital infrastructure of smart cities, which are the focus of cybercrimes, as a tool of crime, it also argues that current legal practices, social and cultural values, social support programs and individual education, as well as police measures, are effective in reducing and preventing the effects of cybercrimes on smart cities and their inhabitants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Advances in information and communication technologies are a core element of smart cities, a new phase of urban development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increasing integration of applications developed in parallel with the technology-based revolution into urban life has provided several advantages in the functioning of social life, while the new dynamics emerging from the combination of crime and different technologies have also led to changes in approaches to crime.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the study reveals the processes of manipulating the digital infrastructure of smart cities, which are the focus of cybercrimes, as a tool of crime, it also argues that current legal practices, social and cultural values, social support programs and individual education, as well as police measures, are effective in reducing and preventing the effects of cybercrimes on smart cities and their inhabitants.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kent · Akıllı Kent · Suç

Abstract

Advances in information and communication technologies are a core element of smart cities, a new phase of urban development. The increasing integration of applications developed in parallel with the technology-based revolution into urban life has provided several advantages in the functioning of social life, while the new dynamics emerging from the combination of crime and different technologies have also led to changes in approaches to crime. This study examines the relationship between smart cities and cybercrime within a conceptual framework. The causes, effects, and countermeasures of cyberattacks occurring in smart cities are explored within the framework of "crime opportunity" theory. While the study reveals the processes of manipulating the digital infrastructure of smart cities, which are the focus of cybercrimes, as a tool of crime, it also argues that current legal practices, social and cultural values, social support programs and individual education, as well as police measures, are effective in reducing and preventing the effects of cybercrimes on smart cities and their inhabitants.

Özet

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinde yaşanan gelişmeler kentsel gelişimin yeni bir aşaması olarak kabul edilen akıllı kentlerin de çekirdek unsurudur. Teknoloji temelli devrim paralelinde gelişen uygulamaların giderek artan oranda kent yaşantısıyla bütünleşmesi toplumsal hayatın işleyişinde birtakım avantajlar sağladığı gibi suçun farklı teknolojilerle birleşimiyle ortaya çıkan yeni dinamikler, suç olgusuna ilişkin geliştirilen yaklaşımların da değişmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada akıllı kentler ve siber suçlar arasındaki ilişki kavramsal bir çerçevede ele alınmıştır. Bu manada akıllı kentlerde gerçekleşen siber saldırıların nedenleri, etkileri ve bunlara karşı alınabilecek önlemler “suç fırsatları” teorisi çerçevesinde açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışma, siber suçların odağındaki akıllı kentlerin dijital alt yapılarının suçun aracı olarak manipüle edilmesi süreçlerini ortaya koyarken aynı zamanda siber suçların akıllı kentler ve bu kentlerde yaşayanlar üzerindeki etkilerinin azaltılması ve önlenmesi sürecinde polisiye tedbirlerin yanında güncel hukuki uygulamaların, sosyal ve kültürel değerlerin, sosyal destek programlarının ve bireysel eğitimin etkili olduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erekmekçi, M. (2026). SMART CITIES AND THE DIGITAL EVOLUTION OF CRIME. NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1766642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (91)

  1. Akbaş, İ. (2018). Kent formunun evrimi: Akıllı kent. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 4(68), 375-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7558
  2. Aksakallı, K. İ. (2019). Bulut bilişimde güvenlik zafiyetleri, tehditleri ve bu tehditlere yönelik güvenlik önerileri. UBGMD, 5(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.18640/ubgmd.544054
  3. Alkan, T. (2015). Akıllı kentler ya da 21. yüzyıl şehirleri. Bilişim Dergisi, 182, 70-77. https://www.bilisimdergisi.org.tr/s182/pdf/70-77.pdf
  4. Alwakeel, A., Alwakeel, M., Zahra, S. R., Saleem, T. J., Hijji, M., Alwakeel, S. S., Alwakeel, A. M., & Alzorgi, S. (2023). Common mental disorders in smart city settings and use of multimodal medical sensor fusion to detect them. Diagnostics, 13(6), Makale 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061082
  5. Amos, Z. (2024). 5 best encryption methods for IoT devices. IoT Insider. https://www.iotinsider.com/iot-insights/technical-insights/5-best-encryption-methods-for-iot-devices/
  6. Anadolu Ajansı (AA). (2022, Temmuz 19). İsrail yapımı “Pegasus” casus yazılımı dünyanın dört bir yanında kullanıldı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/israil-yapimi-pegasus-casus-yazilimi-dunyanin-dort-bir-yaninda-kullanildi/2481656
  7. Andress, J., & Winterfeld, S. (2011). Cyber warfare: Techniques, tactics and tools for security practitioners. Elsevier. https://fuuu.be/hack/Syngress-Cyber-Warfare-Technique.pdf
  8. Avcı, İ. (2023). Akıllı ulaşım sistemlerinde siber saldırılar ve önlemler. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 6(1), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1224909
  9. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214, 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
  10. BBC. (2010, Eylül 27). Buşehr’e virüs saldırısı kuşkusu. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2010/09/100927_busehr_cyberwarfare
  11. Bilici, Z., Babahanoğlu, V. (2018). Akıllı kent uygulamaları ve Konya örneği. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 9(2), 124-139. https://izlik.org/JA64AL79GY
  12. Bingöl, İ. (2022). Sosyolojik suç teorilerine kuramsal bir yaklaşım: Sosyal süreç teorileri. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 640-652. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1119294
  13. Brenner, S. W. (2007). At light speed: Attribution and response to cybercrime/terrorism/warfare. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(2), 379-475. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7260&context=jclc
  14. Bulutistan. (2025, 30 Nisan). Sentetik veri nedir ve neden önemlidir? Yapay zekanın gizli gücü. Bulutistan Blog. https://bulutistan.com/blog/sentetik-veri-nedir-ve-neden-onemlidir-yapay-zekanin-gizli-gucu/
  15. Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. M. Tonry & N. Morris (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Cilt 4, ss. 225–256). University of Chicago Press. https://www.academia.edu/89908445/Situational_Crime_Prevention_Its_Theoretical_Basis_and_Practical_Scope
  16. Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2. baskı). Harrow & Heston. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3631/files/scp2_intro_0_0.pdf
  17. Cloud Security Alliance. (2010). Top threats to cloud computing (Versiyon 1.0). https://www.ioactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/csathreats.v1.0-1.pdf
  18. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608. https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/587/readings/Cohen%20and%20Felson%201979%20Routine%20Activities.pdf
  19. Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on cybercrime (ETS No. 185). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/179163/20090225ATT50418EN.pdf
  20. CyberMag. (2018, 30 Ekim). Dünya ülkelerinde veri koruma kanunları nasıl uygulanıyor? CyberMag. https://www.cybermagonline.com/dunya-ulkelerinde-veri-koruma-kanunlari-nasil-uygulaniyor
  21. Çetin, M., & Çiftçi, Ç. (2019). Literatüre göre dünya ve ülkemizden örneklerle akıllı kent kavramının irdelenmesi. Ulusal Çevre Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2(3), 134-143. https://izlik.org/JA99EA26ZS
  22. Çiçek, M. (2024). Türkiye’de biyometrik veri güvenliği: Kişisel verilerin korunması kanunu çerçevesinde etik bir değerlendirme. Kişisel Verileri Koruma Dergisi, 6(2), 54-76. https://izlik.org/JA78XL44UN
  23. Dal, M., & Özdemir, Y. (2020). Dijital Çağda Neden Bir Kent Sürdürülebilir Akıllı Şehir Olmalıdır? Uluslararası Doğu Anadolu Fen Mühendislik ve Tasarım Dergisi, 2(2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.47898/ijeased.728019
  24. Deutsche Welle (DW). (2021, 9 Şubat). Florida’da su arıtma tesisine siber saldırı. DW. https://www.dw.com/tr/floridada-su-ar%C4%B1tma-tesisine-siber-sald%C4%B1r%C4%B1/a-56511754
  25. Doğantuna, T., & Ceran, O. (2025). Çağrı cihazı saldırıları sonrası siber tehdit istihbaratı için yeni bir perspektif ve model önerisi. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 21(52), 415-447. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1695757
  26. Donadio, T. (2023). Theorising social justice within the smart city: Expanding urban paradigms by the notion of the right to the city. Public Policy Portuguese Journal, 8(1), 10–20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371721286_Theorising_social_justice_within_the_smart_city_expanding_urban_paradigms_by_the_notion_of_the_right_to_the_city
  27. Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Big data and Internet of Things applications in smart cities: Recent advances, challenges, and critical issues. Internet of Things, 34, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.101770 E-Estonia. (t.y). X-road interoperability services. https://e-estonia.com/solutions/interoperability-services/x-road/ Epic. (2025). Equifax data breach. Electronic Privacy Information Center. https://archive.epic.org/privacy/data-breach/equifax/
  28. Fattah, E. A. (1997). Criminology: Past, present and future: A critical overview. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.com.tr/books?redir_esc=y&hl=ko&id=yEauCwAAQBAJ&q=Crimi#v=onepage&q&f=false Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police Research Series Paper No. 98). Home Office. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3631/files/opportunity_makes_the_thief.pdf
  29. Fox, T. (2025, 11 Aralık). 2025 Cybersecurity Almanac: 100 Facts, figures, predictions and statistics. Cybersecurity Ventures. https://cybersecurityventures.com/cybersecurity-almanac-2025/
  30. Gdali, Z. (2026, 19 March). Best practices for IoT security in private 5G. Firecell. https://firecell.io/iot-security-best-practices-private-5g/
  31. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science. https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
  32. Gordon, S., & Ford, R. (2006). On the definition and classification of cybercrime. Journal of Computer Virology, 2(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-006-0015-z
  33. Gousteris, S., Stamatiou, Y. C., Halkiopoulos, C., Antonopoulou, H., & Kostopoulos, N. (2023). Secure distributed cloud storage based on the blockchain technology and smart contracts. Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-012
  34. Güvenliweb. (t.y). İnternetin bilinçli kullanımı. https://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/dokumanlar/internetin-bilincli-kullanimi
  35. Haberler.com. (2014, Ağustos 24). Trafik ışıkları hacker saldırılarına karşı savunmasız. https://www.haberler.com/dunya/trafik-isiklari-hacker-saldirilari-karsisinda-6410130-haberi/
  36. Habertürk. (2014). Trafik ışıklarını hack’lediler. https://www.haberturk.com/ekonomi/teknoloji/haber/984057-trafik-isiklarini-hacklediler
  37. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257
  38. Hashem, I. A. T., Chang, V., Anuar, N. B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I., Gani, A., Ahmed, E., & Chiroma, H. (2016). The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002
  39. Hayta, Y. (2021). Akıllı kent uygulamalarında kişisel verilerin gizliliği ve güvenliği. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 31(2), 929-941. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.897321
  40. Hekim, H., & Başıbüyük, O. (2013). Siber suçlar ve Türkiye’nin siber güvenlik politikaları. Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi, 4(2), 135-158. https://bgys.iku.edu.tr/sites/bgys/files/inline-files/Siber%20Su%C3%A7lar%20ve%20T%C3%BCrkiye%E2%80%99nin%20Siber%20G%C3%BCvenlik%20Politikalar%C4%B1.pdf
  41. Internet Crime Complaint Center. (2023). 2023 internet crime report. Federal Bureau of Investigation. https://www.ic3.gov/annualreport/reports/2023_ic3report.pdf
  42. İnnova. (2022, Nisan 12). Mobil uygulamaların güvenliğini nasıl sağlayabilirsiniz? https://www.innova.com.tr/blog/mobil-uygulamalarin-guvenligini-nasil-saglayabilirsiniz
  43. Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hactivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause. Routledge. https://www.thing.net/~rdom/ucsd/3somesPlus/hacktivismcyberwars.pdf
  44. Kaharevic, A., & Wihlborg, E. (2024). Whose future is smart? A systematic literature review of smart cities and disadvantaged neighborhoods. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3680127.3680220
  45. Kemeç, A., & Gül, H. (2021). Antalya Büyükşehir Belediyesi örneğinde akıllı kent uygulamaları. Kamu Yönetimi ve Politikaları Dergisi, 2(3), 355-382. https://izlik.org/JA95GD38EE
  46. Kılınç, F., & Eyüpoğlu, C. (2023). Ağ ortamındaki saldırı türleri: Saldırı senaryo örnekleri. Journal of Technology and Applied Sciences, 6(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.56809/icujtas.1282687
  47. Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu. (2016, Nisan 7). Resmî Gazete (Sayı: 29677). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/04/20160407-8.pdf
  48. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic literature reviews (NICTA Technical Report 0400011T.1). Keele University. https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf
  49. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/content_analysis-kippendorf-book.pdf
  50. Kyocera Turkey. (t.y). Dijital dönüşüm veri güvenliği ihtiyaçlarını nasıl değiştiriyor. https://www.kyoceradocumentsolutions.com.tr
  51. Lamond, G. (2007). What is a crime? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(4), 609-632. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm015
  52. Laufs, J. (2022). Crime prevention and detection technologies in smart cities: Opportunities and challenges [Doktora tezi, University College London]. UCL Discovery. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10147500/1/PhD%20Thesis_compressed.pdf
  53. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
  54. Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., Colomer-Llınàs, J., & Meléndez-Frigola, J. (2015). Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 611-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012
  55. Martin, A. (2025, April 24). Cyberattack hits drinking water supplier in Spanish town near Barcelona. The Record. https://therecord.media/cyberattack-water-supplier-barcelona-spain
  56. McLennan, D. (2016). The spatial patterning of exposure to inequality and its social consequences in South Africa: Work in progress. M. Leach, J. Gaventa, P. Justino & M. Denis (Ed.), World social science report 2016: Challenging inequalities — Pathways to a just world içinde (ss. 146–150). ISSC, IDS ve UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245825
  57. MİA. (2025). Yapay zekâ, toplum ve güvenlik: Durum analizi ve Türkiye’nin stratejik yol haritası. https://mia.edu.tr/uploads/f/27062025_1.pdf
  58. Mirghaemi, S. A. (2019). Akıllı kentler üzerine bir inceleme: Türkiye örneği. Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.20854/bujse.628495
  59. Mobbs, P. (2002). Computer crime: The law on the misuse of computers and networks. GreenNet Civil Society Internet Rights Project. https://www.scribd.com/document/268466390/irtb-08
  60. Monahan, T. (2018). The image of the smart city: Surveillance protocols and social inequality. https://publicsurveillance.com/papers/smart_city1.pdf
  61. Nagle Alverio, G., Sowers, J., & Weinthal, E. (2025). Climate change, conflict, and urban migration. Environment and Security, 3(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796241259242
  62. NTV. (2016). İETT hack’lendi. https://www.ntv.com.tr/teknoloji/iett-hacklendi,D_vRU-9jDEygDmc0YD65og
  63. Nweze-Iloekwe, N. (2022). The legal and regulatory aspect of international cybercrime and cybersecurity: Limits and challenges [Doktora tezi, Golden Gate University School of Law]. GGU Law Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/theses/88
  64. OPSWAT. (2025, 5 Mayıs). IoT güvenlik zorlukları: Bağlanabilirliğin geleceği nasıl korunur? https://turkish.opswat.com/blog/iot-security-challenges
  65. Oracle. (2021, June 30). What is data security? https://www.oracle.com/security/database-security/what-is-data-security/
  66. Örselli, E., & Akbay, C. (2019). Teknoloji ve kent yaşamında dönüşüm: Akıllı kentler. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(1), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.544549
  67. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  68. Pakistan Observer. (2026, 9 September). Alarming data breach. Pakistan Observer. https://pakobserver.net/alarming-data-breach/
  69. Paloalto Networks. (2025). What is the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)? https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/ccpa
  70. Population Matters. (2024, 8 March). Global resources dwindling as demand rises. https://populationmatters.org/news/2024/03/global-resources-dwindling-as-demand-rises/
  71. Recorded Future. (2025, December 18). What is malware? Definition & protection. https://www.recordedfuture.com/threat-intelligence-101/what-is-malware
  72. Samuel, J. J. C. T. (2009). Instant-messaging security: The nature of the threat; Phishing and social engineering (Part III). In J. R. Vacca (Ed.), Computer and information security handbook (pp. 459-466). Morgan Kaufmann. https://booksite.elsevier.com/samplechapters/9780123704719/Sample_Chapters/01~Front_Matter.pdf Siber Bülten. (2019, Ekim 27). Şehir hacklemek moda oldu: Saldırganlar Johannesburg için 4 Bitcoin istedi. SİBERBÜLTEN.https://siberbulten.com/siber-saldirilar-2/sehir-hacklemek-moda-oldu-saldirganlar-johannesburg-icin-4-bitcoin-istedi/
  73. Singapore Police Force. (2025). Siber suçun sınıflandırılması ve tanımı. https://www.police.gov.sg/Advisories/Cybercrime/Cybercrime
  74. Şahin, A., & Yılmaz, F. H. (2019). Akıllı kent uygulamaları: Stockholm ve Bursa üzerinden bir değerlendirme. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 6(43), 2897-2915. https://www.jshsr.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1211/1164
  75. The420.in. (2025, 29 May). Cyberattack hits Power Department’s Bill Sahuliyat App: Thousands in Kashmir left in the dark. https://the420.in/kashmir-electricity-bill-app-cyberattack-kpdcl-launches-backup-platform / Thomas, D., & Loader, B. (Eds.). (2000). Cybercrime: Law enforcement, security and surveillance in the information age. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203354643/cybercrime-douglas-thomas-brian-loader
  76. Townsend, A. M. (2013). Quest for a new utopia: Build the smart city of the future, one street corner at a time. The Cairo Review. https://www.thecairoreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/CR11_Townsend.pdf
  77. Turhan, O. (2006). Bilgisayar ağları ile ilgili suçlar (siber suçlar) [Yayımlanmamış Planlama Uzmanlığı Tezi]. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Bilgisayar-Aglari-ile-Ilgili-Suclar-Siber-Suclar-Oguz-Turhan.pdf
  78. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi (CBDDO). (2025). Bilgi ve iletişim güvenliği tedbirleri genelgesi. https://cbddo.gov.tr
  79. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2023). Türkçe sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr
  80. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). New frontiers of conflict: Signals spotlight 2024. https://www.undp.org/future-development/signals-spotlight-2024/new-frontiers-of-conflict/
  81. UN-Habitat. (2024). World Cities Report 2024: Cities and climate action. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2024-cities-and-climate-action
  82. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Comprehensive study on cybercrime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/CYBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf
  83. Uslu, H. (2023). Dijital Dönüşüm ve Kamu Hizmetleri Yönetimde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar ve Zorluklar. Uluslararası Politik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.25272/icps.1354693
  84. van Heek, J., Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2016). How fear of crime affects needs for privacy safety: Acceptance of surveillance technologies in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (pp. 32–43). SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications. ISBN: 978-989-758-184-7
  85. van Zoonen, L. (2016). Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 472-480. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/97108/REPUB_97108-OA.pdf
  86. Varol, Ç. (2017). Sürdürülebilir gelişmede akıllı kent yaklaşımı: Ankara’daki belediyelerin uygulamaları. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 26(1), 43-58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343017037_Surdurulebilir_Gelismede_Akilli_Kent_Yaklasimi_Ankara’daki_Belediyelerin_Uygulamalari
  87. Verizon. (2025). 2025 data breach investigations report. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/2025-dbir-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf
  88. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand smart city initiatives. Forrester Research. https://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf
  89. Yağcı, B. (2023). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin gelişmesiyle değişen siber suç tanımı ve yaklaşımlar. Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Dergisi, 1(1), 1-24. https://izlik.org/JA37RR98SA
  90. Yanık, T. (2025, 5 Nisan). Mobil uygulamalara verilen bilinçsiz izinler siber güvenliği riske atıyor. Anadolu Ajansı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/bilim-teknoloji/mobil-uygulamalara-verilen-bilincsiz-izinler-siber-guvenligi-riske-atiyor/3528882
  91. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71