Journals / NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİK ALANINDA SOSYAL İNOVASYON: SİSTEMATİK BİR İNCELEME

Hava Yaşbay Kobal(HAKKARİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2589-785X
Pages
355–372
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The benefits of social innovation in social entrepreneurship were the most frequently investigated outcome variable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The inadequacy of governments to address environmental and social problems has increased interest in social innovation and social entrepreneurship within academia, the business world, and civil society, and the number of studies on this topic has also begun to increase.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This systematic review follows the PRISMA protocol and utilizes the TCM (theories, contexts, methods) frameworks developed by Paul et al. (2017) and the ADO (antecedents, decisions, consequences) frameworks developed by Paul and Benito (2018).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The benefits of social innovation in social entrepreneurship were the most frequently investigated outcome variable.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Girişimcilik · Sosyal İnovasyon · Sistematik Derleme

Abstract

The inadequacy of governments to address environmental and social problems has increased interest in social innovation and social entrepreneurship within academia, the business world, and civil society, and the number of studies on this topic has also begun to increase. The aim of this systematic review is to map the major research streams in the field of social innovation, identify commonly used methods and contexts, and identify existing knowledge gaps and how these gaps can be addressed with suitable ideas for future research. This systematic review follows the PRISMA protocol and utilizes the TCM (theories, contexts, methods) frameworks developed by Paul et al. (2017) and the ADO (antecedents, decisions, consequences) frameworks developed by Paul and Benito (2018). In this context, 51 articles published on the topic between 1999 and 2024 were evaluated. The included articles largely addressed the role of collaboration and context as antecedents. The role of context was the most frequently studied mediating variable. The benefits of social innovation in social entrepreneurship were the most frequently investigated outcome variable.

Özet

Hükümetlerin çevresel ve sosyal sorunları çözmedeki yetersizliği, akademi, iş dünyası ve sivil toplumun sosyal inovasyona ve sosyal girişimciliğe olan ilgisini artırmış; bu konuda yapılan çalışmaların sayısı da artmaya başlamıştır. Bu sistematik derlemenin amacı, sosyal girişimcilik alanında sosyal inovasyon konusundaki başlıca araştırma akımlarının haritasını çıkarmak, yaygın olarak kullanılan yöntemleri, bağlamları belirlemek, mevcut bilgi boşluklarını ve bu boşlukların gelecekteki araştırmalar için uygun fikirlerle nasıl ele alınabileceğini belirlemektir. Bu sistematik derleme çalışmasında PRISMA protokolü takip edilmiş ve Paul vd. (2017) tarafından geliştirilen TCM (teoriler, bağlamlar, metodlar) ile Paul ve Benito (2018) tarafından geliştirilen ADO (öncüller, kararlar, sonuçlar) çerçevelerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda 1999-2024 yılları arasında konuyla ilgili yayınlanan 51 adet makalenin değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. İncelemeye dahil edilen makalelerde öncüller olarak büyük oranda iş birliğinin ve bağlamın rolünün ele alındığı tespit edilmiştir. En çok ele alınan aracı değişken de bağlamın rolü olmuştur. Sosyal girişimcilikte sosyal inovasyonun faydaları ise en çok araştırılan sonuç değişkeni olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kobal, H. Y. (2026). SOCIAL INNOVATION IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 355–372. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1822214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Adro, F., & Fernandes, C. I. (2020). Social innovation: A systematic literature review and future agenda research. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17, 23–40.
  2. Agostini, M. R., Vieira, L. M., & Bossle, M. B. (2016). Social innovation as a process to overcome institutional voids: A multidimensional overview. Mackenzie Management Review, 17(6), 72-101.
  3. Aksoy, L., L. Alkire, S. Choi, Kim, P. B. ve Zhang, L. (2019). Social Innovation in Service: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Service Management, 30(3), 429-448.
  4. Alegre, I., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2016). Social innovation success factors: Hospitality and tourism social enterprises. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(6), 1155- 1176.
  5. Altuna, N., Contri, A. M., Dell’Era, C., Frattini, F., & Maccarrone, P. (2015). Managing social innovation in for-profit organizations: The case of intesa Sanpaolo. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), 258-280.
  6. Angelidou, M., & Psaltoglou, A. (2017). An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 33, 113–125.
  7. Antadze, N., & Westley, F. R. (2012). Impact metrics for social innovation: Barriers or bridges to radical change?. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 133–150.
  8. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-¬‐Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, January, 1-19.
  9. Biggs, R., Westley, F. R., & Carpenter, S. R. (2010). Navigating the back loop: Fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 9. URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art9/
  10. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2013). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
  11. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Stamati, D., & Valvi, T. (2019). Social business model innovation: A quadruple/quintuple Helix-based social innovation ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.
  12. Caroli, M. G., Fracassi, E., Maiolini, R., & Carnini Pulino, S. (2018). Exploring social innovation components and attributes: A taxonomy proposal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 94-109.
  13. Cattivelli, V., & Rusciano, V. (2020). Social innovation and food provisioning during Covid-19: The case of urban–rural initiatives in the province of Naples. Sustainability, 12(444), 1-15.
  14. Chalmers, D. M., & Balan-Vnuk. E. (2013). Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. International Small Business Journal, 31, 785–810.
  15. Chalmers, D. (2012). Social innovation: An exploration of the barriers faced by innovating organizations in the social economy. Local Economy, 28(1), 17–34.
  16. Correia, S. E. N., De Olivera, V. M., & Gomez, C. R. P. (2016). Dimensions of social innovation ant the roles of organizational actor: The proposition of a framework. Mackenzie Management Review, 17(6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.
  17. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
  18. Cui, M., Pan, S. L., Newell, S., & Cui, L. (2017). Strategy, resource orchestration and e-commerce enabled social innovation in rural China. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(1), 3–21.
  19. Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal Technology Management, 51(1), 9-21.
  20. Dees, G. (2007). Taking social entrepreneurship Seriously. Society, 44(3), 24-¬31. Domanski, D., Howaldt, J., & Kaletka. C. (2019). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397 Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672-692.
  21. Farinha, L., Sebastião, J. R., Sampaio, C., & Lopes, J. (2020). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: Discovering origins, exploring current and Future Trends. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17, 77–96.
  22. Farmer, J., Carlisle, K., Dickson-Swift, V., Teasdale, S., Kenny, A., Taylor, J., Croker, F., Marini, K., & Gussy, M. (2018). Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: Using a case study approach and mixed methods. BMC Health Services Research, 18(68). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0
  23. Farzad, F. S., Yashar, S., Bin Amran, A., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2020). Social innovation: Towards a better life after COVID-19 crisis: What to concentrate on. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 8(1), 89–120. Foroudi, P., Akarsu, T. N., Marvi, R., & Balakrishnan, J. (2020). Intellectual evolution of social innovation: A bibliometric analysis and avenues for future research trends. Journal Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 446-465.
  24. Goldstein, J., Hazy, J. K., & Silberstang, J. (2010). A complexity science model of social innovation in social enterprise. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 101-125.
  25. Grilo, R., & Moreira, A. C. (2022). The social as the heart of social innovation and social entrepreneurship: An emerging area or an old crossroads?. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6, 53-66.
  26. Groot, A., & Dankbaar, B. (2014). Does social innovation require social entrepreneurship?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 17-26.
  27. Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. Mackenzie Management Review, 17(6), 20-44.
  28. Jaeger-Erben, M., Rückert-John, J., & Schäfer, M. (2015). Sustainable consumption through social innovation: A typology of innovations for sustainable consumption practices. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.042.
  29. Joao-Roland, I., & Granados, M. (2020). Social innovation drivers in social enterprises: Systematic review. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(5), 775-795.
  30. Ko, W. W., Liu, G., Wan Yusoff, W. T., & Che Mat, C. R. (2019). Social entrepreneurial passion and social innovation performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019830243.
  31. Lettice, F., & Parekh, M. (2010). The social innovation process: Themes, challenges and implications for practice. International Journal Technology Management, 51(1), 139-158.
  32. Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J.,. Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 6 (7), e1000100.
  33. Lisetchi, M., & Brancu, L. (2014). The entrepreneurship concept as a subject of social innovation. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 87 – 92. Ludvig, A., Wilding, M., Thorogood, A., & Weiss, G. (2018). Social innovation in the Welsh Woodlands: Community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement. Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier 95(C), 18-25.
  34. Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 747-763. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
  35. Marques, P., Morgan, K., & Richardson, R. (2018). Social innovation inquestion: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 496-512.
  36. Maruyama, Y., Nishikido, M., & Lida, T. (2007). The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation. Energy Policy, 35, 2761–2769.
  37. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 1160–1177.
  38. Milley, P., Szijarto, B., Svensson, K., & Cousins, J. B. (2018). The evaluation of social innovation: A review and integration of the current empirical knowledge base. Evaluation, 24(2), 237 –258.
  39. Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R., & Nicholls, A. (2012). The social finance and social innovation Nexus. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 115–132.
  40. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations, Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145-162. Nandan, M., London, M., & Bent-Goodley, T. (2015). Social workers as social change agents: Social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Faculty Publications, 3770, 1-34. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/3770
  41. Nicolopoulou, K., Karataş-Özkan, M., Vas, M., & Nouman, C. (2017). An incubation perspective on social innovation: The London Hub—A social incubator. R&D Management, 47, 368–384.
  42. Oeij, P. R. van der Torre, A., W., Vaasa, F., & Dhondt, S. (2019). Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: Applying the innovation journey model. Journal of Business Research, 101, 243-254.
  43. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 34-43. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan N., & James, P. (2014). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 1 –34.
  44. Phillips, W., Alexander, E. A., & Lee, H. (2019). Going it alone won’t work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 315–331.
  45. Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., & Khan, Z. (2017). Social innovation in emerging economies: A national systems of innovation based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 228-237.
  46. Roehrich, J. K., Lewis, M. A., & George, G. (2014). Are publiceprivate partnerships a healthy option? a systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 110-119.
  47. Sampaio, C., & Sebastião, J. R. (2024). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: Uncovering themes, trends, and discourse. Administrative Sciences, 14(53).
  48. Shaw, E., & Bruin, A. (2013). Reconsidering capitalism: The promise of social innovation and social entrepreneurship?. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 737 –746.
  49. Sinclair, S., Mazzei, M., Baglioni, S., & Roy, M. J. (2018). Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation?. Social Policy & Administration, 52, 1317–1331.
  50. Sottini, A. C. M., Zupic, I., & Giudici, A. (2025). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: A bibliometric review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 43, 182–193.
  51. Tanimoto, K. (2012). The emergent process of social innovation: Multi-stakeholders perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4(3/4), 267-280.
  52. Tortia, E. C., Degavre, F., & Poledrini, S. (2020). Why are social enterprises good candidates for social innovation? Looking for personal and institutional drivers of innovation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 91, 459–477.
  53. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222.
  54. Vézina, M., Selma, M. B., & Malo, M. C. (2019). Exploring the social innovation process in a large market based social enterprise. Management Decision, 57(6), 1399-1414.
  55. Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K., & Geobey, S. (2014). Five configurations for scaling up social innovation: Case examples of nonprofit organizations from Canada. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314532945 Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F. F., & Toivonen, M. (2016). The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations: A bridge between service an social innovation research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), ff10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0033ff. Yıldırım, B., & Tuncay, T. (2019). Sosyal inovasyonun ve sosyal girişimciliğin sosyal hizmet mesleğinin geleceğindeki rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 169-187. Yoon, S., & Ho, J-Y. (2024). Delivering sustainable development via social innovation: Cases of social entrepreneurship in South Korea and Singapore. Sustainable Development, 33, 416–430.
  56. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-¬‐Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, January, 1-19.
  57. Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J.,. Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 6 (7), e1000100.