Journals / International Journal of Social Inquiry / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Sociological Foundations of Regenerative Planning: Identity, Trauma, and Renewal Processes in Post-Conflict Cities

Rejeneratif Planlamanın Sosyolojik Temelleri: Savaş Sonrası Kentlerde Kimlik, Travma ve Yenilenme Süreçleri

Mert Erekmekçi(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, SOSYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7165-8884
Pages
399–427
Publication Date
2026-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study offers a tangible theoretical and practical guide for post-conflict planning policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wars inflict profound socio-spatial damages on cities, including collective trauma, identity erosion, and social capital loss, alongside physical destruction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Post-war urban reconstruction literature focuses predominantly on physical restoration, lacking comprehensive models that integrate the sociological dimensions of destruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study offers a tangible theoretical and practical guide for post-conflict planning policies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rejeneratif planlama · savaş sonrası kentler · kolektif travma

Abstract

Wars inflict profound socio-spatial damages on cities, including collective trauma, identity erosion, and social capital loss, alongside physical destruction. Post-war urban reconstruction literature focuses predominantly on physical restoration, lacking comprehensive models that integrate the sociological dimensions of destruction. To bridge this theoretical gap, this study presents an original conceptual model translating the abstract sociological foundations of regenerative planning into analytical parameters. Conducted via the PRISMA-ScR protocol, this systematic scoping review examines identity construction, trauma healing, and social renewal in post-war cities through descriptive analysis and thematic coding. The regenerative approach is positioned as a restorative mechanism centering collective memory to transform trauma into social cohesion. The study’s distinct conceptual contribution is introducing the term “memory acupuncture” to literature, denoting targeted, small-scale socio-cultural interventions in traumatic spaces. A comparative thematic synthesis of Sarajevo, Mosul, Mogadishu, and Gaza demonstrates that participatory, memory acupuncture-based micro-interventions restructure cities both physically and socially; conversely, lacking regenerative planning perpetuates trauma and identity erosion. This study offers a tangible theoretical and practical guide for post-conflict planning policies.

Özet

Savaşlar, kentlerde fiziksel yıkımın yanı sıra kolektif travma, kimlik erozyonu ve sosyal sermaye kaybı gibi derin sosyo-mekânsal tahribatlar yaratmaktadır. Savaş sonrası kentsel rekonstrüksiyon literatürü çoğunlukla fiziksel onarıma odaklanmakta, yıkımın sosyolojik boyutlarını bütünleştiren kapsayıcı modellerden yoksun kalmaktadır. Bu çalışma, kuramsal boşluğu doldurmak üzere rejeneratif planlamanın soyut sosyolojik temellerini analitik parametrelere dönüştüren özgün bir kavramsal model sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. PRISMA-ScR protokolüyle yürütülen bu sistematik kapsamlı derlemede; betimsel analiz ve tematik kodlama yoluyla savaş sonrası kentlerde kimlik inşası, travma onarımı ve toplumsal yenilenme süreçleri ele alınmıştır. Rejeneratif yaklaşım; kolektif hafızayı merkeze alan ve travmaları sosyal uyuma dönüştüren restoratif bir mekanizma olarak konumlandırılmıştır. Çalışmanın özgün kavramsal katkısı, travmatik mekânlara yönelik hedefli ve küçük ölçekli sosyo-kültürel müdahaleleri ifade eden “hafıza akupunkturu” kavramının literatüre kazandırılmasıdır. Saraybosna, Musul, Mogadişu ve Gazze örnekleri üzerinden yapılan karşılaştırmalı tematik sentez; katılımcı ve hafıza akupunkturu temelli mikro-müdahalelerin kentleri toplumsal olarak da yeniden yapılandırdığını, bu yaklaşımın yokluğunda ise kimlik erozyonunun kalıcılaştığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erekmekçi, M., *, M. E. (2026). Sociological Foundations of Regenerative Planning: Identity, Trauma, and Renewal Processes in Post-Conflict Cities. International Journal of Social Inquiry, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 399–427. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1928229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Abdelhamid, A., Pelling, M., Basdoğan, S., Chanin-morris, R., Comelli, T., Dabbeek, J., & Menteşe, E. (2026). The future of Gaza: Existing plans can frame a locally inclusive and risk-sensitive reconstruction. Environment & Urbanization, 38(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478261423509
  2. Abusaada, H., & Elshater, A. (2026). The dis/continuity of the chain: The negative dialectic of tabula rasa and palimpsest in urban design. Urban Science, 10(3), Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10030151
  3. Ahmed, I. I., & Green, R. H. (1999). The heritage of war and state collapse in Somalia and Somaliland: Local-level effects, external interventions and reconstruction. Third World Quarterly, 20(1), 113–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993185
  4. Alexander, J. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser, ve P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity içinde (ss. 1–30). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520235946.003.0001
  5. Al Hamoud, A. (2025). Preserving identity and collective memory: Strategies for the socially acceptable reconstruction of Aleppo’s informal settlements. ArchiDOCT, 13(1), 52–64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397290057
  6. Alvanides, S., & Ludwig, C. (2023). Bombed cities: Legacies of post-war planning on the contemporary urban and social fabric. Urban Planning, 8(1), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6828
  7. Arab League. (2025, March). Gaza recovery, reconstruction & development plan. https://egyptembassy.net/media/Gaza-Recovery-Reconstruction-and-Development-Plan.pdf
  8. Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. https://www.academia.edu/38303747/Assmann_Jan_Cultural_Memory_and_Early_Civilization
  9. Associated Press (AP). (2017, December 20). Freedom from IS in Mosul costs lives of 9,000-plus civilians. https://apnews.com/6d94ba30348e4a25bf76e031b0212ef9
  10. Björkdahl, A., & Kappler, S. (2019). The creation of transnational memory spaces: Professionalization and commercialization. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09334-7
  11. Bollens, S. A. (2012). City and soul in divided societies. Routledge.
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education içinde (ss. 241–258). Greenwood.
  13. Calame, J., & Charlesworth, E. (2011). Divided cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  14. Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Çev.). University of California Press. Coward, M. (2009). Urbicide: The politics of urban destruction. Routledge.
  15. Culbertson, S., Ruthenberg, K., Lane, R., Lehrer, N., Vaiana, M. E., & Anthony, C. R. (2025). From camps to communities: Post-conflict shelter in Gaza (Research Report No. RR-A3486-2). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA3400/RRA3486-2/RAND_RRA3486-2.pdf
  16. Dimelli, D., & Kotsoni, A. (2023). The reconstruction of post-war cities-Proposing integrated conservation plans for Aleppo’s reconstruction. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065472
  17. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  18. Graham, S. (2010). Cities under siege: The new military urbanism. Verso.
  19. Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory (F. J. Ditter, Jr. ve V. Y. Ditter, Çev.). Harper & Row. (Orijinal eser 1950).
  20. Hamamra, B., Mahamid, F., Bdier, D., & Atiya, M. (2025). War-related trauma in narratives of Gazans: Challenges, difficulties and survival coping. Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, 12, Article e34. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.23
  21. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  22. Humanity in Action. (2024). Memory Atlas - Mapping memorials to civilian victims of war. https://humanityinaction.org/action_project/memory-atlas-mapping-memorials-to-civilian-victims-of-war/
  23. Huyssen, A. (2003). Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford University Press.
  24. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
  25. Janoff-Bulman, R. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Three explanatory models. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 30–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20447198
  26. Khalilia, A. Z. (2024). Urbicide the city of Gaza. 7th International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism (ICCAUA-2024) Proceedings içinde (ss. 1298–1309). Alanya University. https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2024EN0297
  27. Knapp, C., Poe, J., & Forester, J. (2022). Repair and Healing in Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 23(3), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2082710
  28. Larkin, C., & Rudolf, I. (2024). Memory, violence and post-conflict reconstruction: Rebuilding and reimagining Mosul. Peacebuilding, 12(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2023.2247722
  29. Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. Routledge.
  30. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Çev.). Blackwell.
  31. Lerner, J. (2014). Urban acupuncture: Celebrating pinpricks of change that Enrich City life. Island Press.
  32. Lukic, J. (2014, 4 Haziran). Sarajevo roses as a reminder of the dead. Balkan Diskurs. https://balkandiskurs.com/en/2014/06/04/sarajevo-roses-as-a-reminder-of-the-dead/
  33. Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
  35. Marot, S. (1999). The reclaiming of sites. J. Corner (Ed.), Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape architecture içinde (ss. 45–57). Princeton Architectural Press.
  36. Martín-Díaz, J. (2014). Urban restructuring in post-war contexts: The case of Sarajevo. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.3.5
  37. Mannergren Selimovic, J. (2022). Stuff from the siege: Transitional justice and the power of everyday objects in museums. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 16(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac002
  38. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
  39. Milton, S., Elkahlout, G., & Attallah, S. (2024). Shrinking reconstruction space in the Gaza Strip: Rebuilding after the 2021 and 2022 wars. Conflict, Security & Development, 24(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2024.2314034
  40. Mohamed, A. A. (2024). Urban reconstruction in post-war cities by the approach of collective memories: The case of Mogadishu. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(8), 3105–3116. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190824
  41. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
  42. Norwegian Refugee Council. (2025). Beyond return: Ensuring sustainable recovery & re-integration in Syria. https://www.nrc.no/globalassets/pdf/reports/beyond-return-ensuring-sustainable-recovery--re-integration-in-syria/2025-returns-and-reintegration.pdf
  43. NPR. (2012, October 24). As Somalia’s war ebbs, Mogadishu dares to rebuild. https://www.npr.org/2012/10/24/163562411/as-somalias-war-ebbs-mogadishu-dares-to-rebuild
  44. Pickering, P. M. (2006). Generating social capital for bridging ethnic divisions in the Balkans: Case studies of two Bosniak cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870500352397
  45. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. 10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  46. Regenesis Group. (2016). Regenerative development and design: A framework for evolving sustainability. Wiley.
  47. Roe, J., & McCay, L. (2021). Restorative cities: Urban design for mental health and wellbeing. Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
  48. Sáenz de Tejada, C., Niven, L., Marquant, Q., Demaio, S., Rojas-Rueda, D., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2024). Urban planning, design and management approaches to building urban resilience: A rapid review of the evidence. Cities & Health, 8(6), 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2024.2364491
  49. Tatlić, I., & Zagora, N. (2025). Reshaping social spaces after socialism through citizen participation: The case of Novo Sarajevo’s post-conflict neighborhoods. Urban Planning, 10, Article 9176. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.9176
  50. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Target Article: Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
  51. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Pronovost, C., Hartling, L., Larsson, G., Schein, C., Israel, E., Straus, S. E., & Kastner, M. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  52. Türk, E. (2015). Sosyolojik düşüncede sosyal sermaye tartışmaları: Pierre Bourdieu ve James Samuel Coleman bağlamında karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Sosyal ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi (SKAD), 1(2), 127–149.
  53. Ubesingha, B., Ofori, G., Agyekum-Mensah, G., & Frings, D. (2026). Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: The power of social capital. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.704
  54. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/wcr_2020_report.pdf
  55. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2025). Revive the spirit of Mosul: The rebirth of a city. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383321
  56. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021, May 4). Circular solution to Mosul’s conflict debris launched. United Nations in Iraq. https://iraq.un.org/en/126209-circular-solution-mosul%E2%80%99s-conflict-debris-launched
  57. Wahba, S., Das, M. B., & Chun, Y. (2022). Building back stronger: Urban resilience through post-conflict reconstruction. Journal of International Affairs, 74(1), 127–148.
  58. World Bank ve UNESCO. (2018). Culture in city reconstruction and recovery (CURE Framework): Position paper. UNESCO / World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30733
  59. World Bank. (2021). Improving Sarajevo’s resilience through urban regeneration: Skenderija complex - Considerations for future development. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/334401612179147706/pdf/Improving-Sarajevo-s-Resilience-Through-Urban-Regeneration-Skenderija-Complex-Considerations-for-Future-Development.pdf
  60. World Bank. (2025). Syria physical damage and reconstruction assessment (2011-2024). World Bank Report. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099102025095540101
  61. World Bank, EU, ve UN. (2025). Gaza and West Bank interim rapid damage and needs assessment. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/133c3304e29086819c1119fe8e85366b-0280012025/original/Gaza-RDNA-final-med.pdf
  62. Xie, F., Liu, G., & Zhuang, T. (2021). A comprehensive review of urban regeneration governance for developing appropriate governance arrangements. Land, 10(5), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050545
  63. Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on ‘gray cities’: The coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory, 8(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099300
  64. Ziadah, R. (2025), Development as erasure: Palestine, genocide and ‘reconstruction’. Dev Change, 56: 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70014
  65. Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. Skyhorse Publishing.