SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Sayı: 43

A DRAWBACK IN TURKISH BUDGET CLASSIFICATION: WHERE HAVE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS GONE?

TÜRK BÜTÇE SINIFLANDIRMASININ EKSİK HALKASI: KAMU YATIRIMLARI NEREYE KAYBOLDU?

Ferhat AKBEY
Pages
175–202
Publication Date
2015-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here, I make three alternative technical recommendations to fix this drawback.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In 2006, Turkish fiscal structure has changed its budgeting and budget classification system from a program based and accordingly classified hybrid one (between Program Budgeting and Planning-Programming-Budgeting systems) to a strategically planned, performance based and analytically classified multi-year budgeting system that was structured in line with European System of Accounts (ESA) and Government Finance Statistics (GFS) which have been shaped by neoliberal praxis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:What’s wrong with this new classification is that public investment expenditures cannot be clearly distinguished from other outlays.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here, I make three alternative technical recommendations to fix this drawback.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Public Investment Expenditure · Budget Classification · Analytical Budget Classification.

Abstract

In 2006, Turkish fiscal structure has changed its budgeting and budget classification system from a program based and accordingly classified hybrid one (between Program Budgeting and Planning-Programming-Budgeting systems) to a strategically planned, performance based and analytically classified multi-year budgeting system that was structured in line with European System of Accounts (ESA) and Government Finance Statistics (GFS) which have been shaped by neoliberal praxis. What’s wrong with this new classification is that public investment expenditures cannot be clearly distinguished from other outlays. Pursuant to “non-investor minimal state” approach of the neoliberal thought, the idea of “public investment” is the missing point of new classification system. Here, I make three alternative technical recommendations to fix this drawback.

Özet

2006 yılında Türk mali yapısı, program temelli ve program sınıflandırma tipine sahip hibrid (Program Bütçe Sistemi ve Planlama-Programlama-Bütçeleme Sistemi arasında) bir bütçe ve sınıflandırma sisteminden, stratejik olarak planlanan, performans esaslı, analitik biçimde sınıflandırılan ve neoliberal praksis tarafından şekillendirilen Avrupa Hesaplar Sistemi (ESA) ile Devlet Finans İstatistiklerine (GFS) uygun olarak yapılandırılmış, çok yıllı bir sisteme geçmiştir. Yeni sınıflandırma sisteminin temel eksikliği, harcamacı kuruluşlarca gerçekleştirilen yatırım harcamalarının açık olarak görülememesidir. Neoliberal öğretinin “yatırımcı olmayan minimal devlet” yaklaşımına uygun olarak, “kamu yatırımı” düşüncesi, yeni sınıflandırma sisteminin kayıp halkası olmuştur. Çalışmada, bu eksikliğin giderilmesine yönelik olarak, üç alternatif teknik öneri ortaya konmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBEY, F. (2015). A DRAWBACK IN TURKISH BUDGET CLASSIFICATION: WHERE HAVE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS GONE?. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 43, 175–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/118920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. BACKER, Larry C.; (2010), “Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises, and the Chinese Experience”, Transnational Law & Contemporary Prob- lems, 19(3), pp. 3-144.
  2. BARNETT, Clive; (2010), “Publics and Markets: What’s wrong with Neoliber- alism?”, Internet Address: http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/ emer- gentpublics/publications/barnett_publicsandmarkets.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  3. BRAND, Ralf and Frank GAFFIKIN; (2007), “Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World”, Planning Theory, 6(3), pp. 282-313.
  4. BRÜCKNER, Markus and Anita TULADHAR; (2010), “Public Investment As a Fiscal Stimulus: Evidence from Japan’s Regional Spending During the 1990s”, IMF Working Paper (WP/10/110), Internet Address: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10110.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  5. CAVALLO, Eduardo and Christian DAUDE; (2011), “Public Investment in Developing Countries: A Blessing or A Curse?”, Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 39, pp. 65-81.
  6. CLARKE, John; (2010), “After Neo-Liberalism? Markets, States and the Rein- vention of Public Welfare”, Cultural Studies, 24(3), pp. 375-394.
  7. EASTERLY, William; Timothy IRWIN and Luis SERVÉN; (2008), “Walking up the Down Escalator: Public Investment and Fiscal Stability”, The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), pp. 37-56.
  8. ELLWOOD, Sheila and Susan NEWBERRY; (2007), “Public Sector Accrual Accounting: Institutionalising Neo-Liberal Principles?”; Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), pp. 549-573.
  9. European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (1993), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ nationalaccount/ docs/1993sna.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-1993)”, Internet Address: European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (2008), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-2008)”, Internet Address: European Commission; (1995), “European System of Accounts (ESA-1995)”, Internet Address: http://www.comptanat.fr/en/esa95/sec95.htm, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. European Commission; (2010), “European System of Accounts (ESA-2010)”, Internet Address: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ ITY_OFFPUB/ KS-02-13-269/EN/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  10. GOMES, Pedro and Francois POUGET; (2008), “Corporate Tax Competition and the Decline of Public Investment”, CESifo Working Paper, No: 2384, Internet Address: https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstrea