Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2014 / Sayı: 166

A literature review on the relationship between r&d, innovation and development: Theoretical brief

Ar-ge, inovasyon ve kalkınma ilişkisine yönelik bir literatür taraması: Kuramsal özet

Pages
1–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, other contributions to the issue have been set forth, including Harvey’s reservations on amortization of old technology and deskilling effects on the labor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to put forward a systematic literature review on the relationship between R&D, innovation and economic development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, firstly, science-technology-innovation relations have been evaluated in a historical perspective.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, other contributions to the issue have been set forth, including Harvey’s reservations on amortization of old technology and deskilling effects on the labor.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to put forward a systematic literature review on the relationship between R&D, innovation and economic development. In this sense, firstly, science-technology-innovation relations have been evaluated in a historical perspective. Then, within the context of general literature on R&D-innovation- development relations; Marx’s capitalism-based analysis, Schumpeter’s creative destruction discourse, Solow’s analysis of capital-labor ratio, Romer’s evaluations on increasing marginal returns, Lucas’ emphasis on human capital, Grossman and Helpman’s North-South differentiation, Aghion and Howitt’s analysis on expectations between two innovation periods, and Jones’ population-based approach have been revealed. Lastly, other contributions to the issue have been set forth, including Harvey’s reservations on amortization of old technology and deskilling effects on the labor.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı Araştırma Geliştirme (Ar-Ge), inovasyon ve ekonomik kalkınma ilişkisine yönelik sistematik bir literatür taraması ortaya koymaktır. Buna yönelik olarak öncelikle bilim-teknoloji-inovasyon ilişkisi tarihsel perspektife oturtularak ele alınmıştır. Ardından Ar-Ge, inovasyon ve kalkınma bağlantısını ele alan genel literatür bağlamında; Marx’ın kapitalizm eksenli analizi, Schumpeter’in yaratıcı yıkım söylemi, Solow’un sermaye-işgücü oranı tahlili, Romer’in artan marjinal getiri oranı değerlendirmesi, Lucas’ın beşeri sermaye vurgusu, Grossman ve Helpman’ın Kuzey-Güney ayrımı, Aghion ve Howitt’in iki inovasyon dönemi arasındaki beklentiler analizi ve son olarak Jones’un nüfus eksenli yaklaşımı ele alınmıştır. Sonrasında ise Harvey’nin eski teknolojinin amortismanı ve işgücünün yeteneksizleşmesi konularındaki çekinceleri dahil diğer özgün katkılar özetlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBEY, F. (2014). A literature review on the relationship between r&d, innovation and development: Theoretical brief. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 166, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/78955

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (1992), “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
  2. Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (2009),
  3. The Economics of Growth, London: The MIT Press. Alvargonzález, D. (2013), “Is the History of Science Essentially Whiggish?”, History of Science, 51(1), 85-99.
  4. Andersson, E.R., Jansson, B. ve Lundblad, J. (2013), “Immanuel Kant Revisited-A Note on the US Innovation Policy”, International Journal of Innovation Science, 5(3), 137-142.
  5. Bel, R. (2013), “Innovation: Misconceptions, Trends, and Directions”, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 32(2), 71-87.
  6. Bravo-Ortega, C. ve Marín, Á.G. (2011), “R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue?”, World Development, 39(7), 1090-1107.
  7. Coccia, M. (2012), “Political Economy of R&D to Support the Modern Competitiveness of Nations and Determinants of Economic Optimization and Inertia”, Technovation, 32, 370-379.
  8. Cozzi, G. ve Galli, S. (2009), “Science-Based R&D in Schumpeterian Growth”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56(4), 474-491.
  9. Crespi, G. ve Zuniga, P. (2012), “Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries”, World Development, 40(2), 273-290.
  10. Diao, X., Roe, T. ve Yeldan, E. (1999), “Strategic Policies and Growth: An Applied Model of R&D-Driven Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, 60, 343-380.
  11. Dougherty, J.P. (2009), “Science and the Shaping of Modernity: The Reciprocal Influence of Science and Culture”, Modern Age, 51(2), 133-143.
  12. Dura, C. ve Atik, H. (2002),
  13. Bilgi Toplumu, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Türkiye (Birinci Basım), İstanbul:
  14. Literatür Yayıncılık. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M. ve Sapprasert, K. (2012), “Innovation: Exploring the Knowledge Base”, Research Policy, 41, 1132-1153. García-Manjón, J.V. ve Romero-Merino, M.E. (2012), “Research, Development, and Firm Growth. Empirical Evidence from European Top R&D Spending Firms”, Research Policy, 41, 1084-1092.
  15. Griffiths, W. ve Webster, E. (2010), “What Governs Firm-level R&D: Internal or External Factors?”, Technovation, 30, 471-481.
  16. Grossman, G.M. ve Helpman, E. (1991), “Endogenous Product Cycles”, The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1214-1229.
  17. Gruber, W., Mehta, D. ve Vernon, R. (1967), “The R&D Factor in International Trade and International Investment of United States Industries”, Journal of Political Economy, 75(1), 20-37.
  18. Harter, N. (2012), “Opinion: Phenomenology of Innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Science, 4(3), 185-190.
  19. Harvey, D. (2011), The Enigma of Cap