Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

A Research in ICI 1000 on Variables That Affect Product Innovation Performance

Ürün Yeniliği Performansına Etki Eden Değişkenler Üzerine İSO 1000’de Bir Araştırma

Pages
440–456
Publication Date
2019-01-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that learning-oriented organizational culture, formal organizational structure and environmental dynamism affect product innovation performance positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to determine the impact of learning-oriented organizational culture, formal organizational structure and environmental dynamism on product innovation performance of businesses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to the managers of manufacturing firms included within the Istanbul (Istanbul Chamber of Industry) 1000 list (N:120).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that learning-oriented organizational culture, formal organizational structure and environmental dynamism affect product innovation performance positively.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ürün yeniliği performansı · formal örgüt yapısı · öğrenme odaklı örgüt kültürü

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the impact of learning-oriented organizational culture, formal organizational structure and environmental dynamism on product innovation performance of businesses. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to the managers of manufacturing firms included within the Istanbul (Istanbul Chamber of Industry) 1000 list (N:120). The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS and SmartPLS structural equation modeling program. As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that learning-oriented organizational culture, formal organizational structure and environmental dynamism affect product innovation performance positively.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğrenme odaklı örgüt kültürü, formal örgütsel yapı gibi örgüte ait değişkenler ile işletmelerin faaliyette bulundukları sektördeki rekabet yoğunluğu ve pazar dalgalanmasını ifade eden ve örgüt dışı bir unsur olarak araştırmaya dahil edilen çevresel dinamizmin ürün yeniliği performansına etkisini saptamaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda İSO (İstanbul Sanayi Odası) 1000 listesi içinde yer alan 405 üretim işletmesinden 120 tanesinin yöneticilerine anket uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS ve SmartPLS yapısal eşitlik modellemesi programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda öğrenme odaklı örgüt kültürü, formal örgüt yapısı ve çevresel dinamizmin ürün yeniliği performansını pozitif yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞURLU, Ö. Y. (2019). A Research in ICI 1000 on Variables That Affect Product Innovation Performance. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 440–456. https://ajindex.com/articles/115739

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R. & Chiva, R. (2006). A Measurement Scale for Product Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (4), 333–346.
  2. Alegre, J. & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing The Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Perofrmance: An Emprical Test. Technovation, 28, 315–326.
  3. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154–1184.
  4. Atik, H. (2005). Yenilik ve Ulusal Rekabet Gücü. Ankara:
  5. Detay Yayıncılık. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  6. Batmaz, N. ve Özcan, A. (2008). Yeniliği Etkileyen Unsurlar ve Toplumsal Refah İlişkisi. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 1 (1), 43–66.
  7. Bessant, J., Kaplinsky, R. & Morris, M. (2003). Developing Capability Through Learning Networks. TMSD, 2 (1), 19–38.
  8. Brown, S.L. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Fındıngs, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 343–378.
  9. Calantone, R.J. Çavuşgil, T. S., & Zhao, Y. (2002).
  10. Learning Orientation, Firm İnnovation Capability, And Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524.
  11. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysıs of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555–590.
  12. Denison, D.R. & Mishra, A.K. (1995). Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 6 (2), 204–223.
  13. Durna, U. (2002). Yenilik Yönetimi. Ankara:
  14. Nobel Yayınları.
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  16. Garcia, R. & Calantone R. (2002). A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Litertaure Review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (2), 110–132.
  17. Goh, S. & Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking The Learning Capacity Of Organizations. European Management Journal, 15, 575–583.
  18. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  19. Henard, D.H. & Szymanski, D.M. (2001). Why Some New Products Are M