KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of a course: "Education and awareness for sustainability"

Gaye TUNCER
Mehmet ERDOĞAN
Sayfa
133–146
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded as a result of the study that integrating real life cases with the issues in the course makes students feel comfortable about the course and feel themselves sensitive and responsible.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article reported and discussed the evaluation of a lecture, designed to change university students’ values related with sustainable ways of living.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was realized with the participation of 85 students from different faculties (faculty of education, economy, administration and engineering).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded as a result of the study that integrating real life cases with the issues in the course makes students feel comfortable about the course and feel themselves sensitive and responsible.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This article reported and discussed the evaluation of a lecture, designed to change university students’ values related with sustainable ways of living. The outcomes of the study were those obtained from the evaluation of the course titled “Education and Awareness for Sustainability”, which has been offered for three years in the Department of Elementary Education, Middle East Technical University–Ankara (Turkey). The study was realized with the participation of 85 students from different faculties (faculty of education, economy, administration and engineering). The study comprised three steps: need assessment (NA), formative evaluation (FE) and summative evaluation (SE). The evaluation model of DIPO emphasizing needs-objectives relationship was used for evaluation. Analyzes, on the other hand, were realized by the use of both qualitative and quantitative research techniques. It was concluded as a result of the study that integrating real life cases with the issues in the course makes students feel comfortable about the course and feel themselves sensitive and responsible.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TUNCER, G., ERDOĞAN, M. (2022). Evaluation of a course: "Education and awareness for sustainability". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 133–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/540889

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E. A., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). “Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: lessons from decision sciences”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33-44.
  2. Bruntland, G. (ed.), (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Ciegis, R., & Gineitiene, D. (2006). The role of universities in promoting sustainability. Engineering Economics, 3(48), 56-62. de Ciurana, A. M. G., & Filho, W. L. (2006). Education for sustainability in university studies: Experiences from project involving European and Latin American universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(1), 81-93. dé Rebello, D. (2003). Shaping the practical role of higher education for a sustainable development. A paper presented at International Conference on Education for a Sustainable Future. Charles University, Karolinum, Prague, Czech Republic, 10 – 11 September. Retrieved on October 08, 2006 from http://www.unesco.org/iau/sd/pdf/
  4. Rebello.pdf Gayford, C. (2004). A model for planning and evaluation of aspects of education for sustainability for students training to teach science in primary schools, Environmental Education Research, 10(2), 255-271.
  5. Hopkins, C., & McKeown R. (2001). Education for Sustainable Development: past experience, present action and future prospects, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 231-244. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). Standards for evaluations of educational programs projects and materials. Donneley & Sons Company. Knapp, D. (1997). Twenty years after Tbilisi: UNESCO interregional workshop on reorienting environmental education for sustainable development. NAI’s Environmental Education Newsletter, 1(1), 6. Leeming, F.C., Dwyer, W.O., Porter, B.E., & Cobern M. K. (1993). Outcome research in environmental education: A critical review. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 8-21.
  6. Mangas, V., Martinez, P., & Pedauye, R. (1977). Analysis of environmental concepts and attitudes among biology degree students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29 (1), 28-33
  7. McKeown, R. (2002). Progress has been made in education for sustainable development. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 1, 21-23.
  8. McMillan E. E. (2003). A Method for Evaluating the Impact of an Introductory Environmental Studies Class on the Values of Students. Applied Environmental Education and Communi