This article specificallyquestions Miller’s claim.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:After more than two centuries of the diffusion of argumentative discourseinto theology, philosophy, law, grammar and poetry in the classicalperiod (tenth through twelfth centuries), Shams al-Din Samarqandi claimed tohave discovered the science of “âdâb al-bahs.” Ottoman intellectuals contri—buted individual treatises on the subject.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Adâb al-bahth as theoretical genreof argumentation theory carried on until the late nineteenth century.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This article specificallyquestions Miller’s claim.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
After more than two centuries of the diffusion of argumentative discourseinto theology, philosophy, law, grammar and poetry in the classicalperiod (tenth through twelfth centuries), Shams al-Din Samarqandi claimed tohave discovered the science of “âdâb al-bahs.” Ottoman intellectuals contri—buted individual treatises on the subject. Adâb al-bahth as theoretical genreof argumentation theory carried on until the late nineteenth century. LarryMiller argues that none of the post-classical writings went much beyond the rules that Samarqandi gave in the Risala and Qustas. This article specificallyquestions Miller’s claim.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
KARABELA, M. K. (2022). POST-SAMARQANDI OTTOMAN ARGUMENTATION THEORY:THE QUESTIONER IN SAÇAKLIZADE. Felsefe Dünyası, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57, 199–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/512953
Larry Benjamin Miller. Islamic Disputation Theory: Study ofthe Development of Dialectic in Islam from the Tenth through Fourteenth Century. PhD. diss., Princeton University, 1984. Saçaklızâde. Takriru‘ ’l—Kavanin el-Miitadavele min ilmi ’l—Miinazara. Istanbul, 1322. Saçaklızâde. Risâle el— Velediyye. Hacı Mahmud Efendi 6150. Şemseddin Semerkandi. Risâlefî Adâbil—Bahs. Ayasofya 4437