Dergiler / İslami İlimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 6

NASS VE TARİH

NASS (REFERENCE TEXT) AND HISTORY

Sayfa
205–218
Yayın Tarihi
2008-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:history · method · rationalist textualist

Özet

It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

Abstract

It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kotan, Ş. (2008). NASS VE TARİH. İslami İlimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 6, 205–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/1416722

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Şatıbî, Ebu İshak, El-Muvafakat, (çev.: Mehmet Erdoğan) İstanbul, 1993.