Journals / İslami İlimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 6

NASS (REFERENCE TEXT) AND HISTORY

NASS VE TARİH

Pages
205–218
Publication Date
2008-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:history · method · rationalist textualist

Abstract

It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

Özet

It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much para doxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most chal lenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones

🔖

Cite This Article

Kotan, Ş. (2008). NASS (REFERENCE TEXT) AND HISTORY. İslami İlimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 6, 205–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/1416722

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Şatıbî, Ebu İshak, El-Muvafakat, (çev.: Mehmet Erdoğan) İstanbul, 1993.