KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kadınlarda İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik ile Yakın İlişkilerde Flört Şiddetine Yönelik Tutum Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Examining the Correlation Between Internalized Sexism and Attitudes Towards Dating Violence in Intimate Relationships in Women

Adem Peker(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KAZIM KARABEKİR EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3594-9166
Tuğba Cingil(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0564-7615
Zeynep Yazıcı(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3454-5212
Sayfa
181–208
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, “Flört Şiddeti Tutumu” ile “İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik” ölçeğinin alt boyutları olan; kendini nesneleştirme, derogasyon, benlik kaybı ve erkeği önceleme arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırmada kadınların içselleştirilmiş cinsiyetçilik düzeyleri ile yakın ilişkide flört şiddeti tutumları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 466 kadın öğrenci oluşturmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, “Flört Şiddeti Tutumu” ile “İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik” ölçeğinin alt boyutları olan; kendini nesneleştirme, derogasyon, benlik kaybı ve erkeği önceleme arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İçselleştirilmiş cinsiyetçilik · Flört şiddeti · Yakın ilişkiler.

Özet

Bu araştırmada kadınların içselleştirilmiş cinsiyetçilik düzeyleri ile yakın ilişkide flört şiddeti tutumları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 466 kadın öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veriler “İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeği” ve “Yakın İlişkide Flört Şiddeti Tutumu Ölçeği” ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular, “Flört Şiddeti Tutumu” ile “İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik” ölçeğinin alt boyutları olan; kendini nesneleştirme, derogasyon, benlik kaybı ve erkeği önceleme arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir. İçselleştirilmiş cinsiyet ölçeğinin alt boyutlarından biri olan rekabet ile flört şiddetine yönelik tutum arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, içselleştirilmiş cinsiyet ölçeğinin kendini nesneleştirme, derogasyon ve erkeği önceleme alt boyutlarının flört şiddetine tutumunu anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Benlik kaybı alt boyutunun ise flört şiddetini anlamlı bir düzeyde yordamadığı saptanmıştır. Cinsiyetçi tutumların içselleştirilmesinin, kadınların hem kendi benliklerine hem de hemcinslerine karşı olumsuz tutum geliştirmelerinde rol oynayabileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu durum ise flört şiddetine karşı çıkma noktasında daha pasif tutumlar sergilenmesi riskini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Dolayısıyla bireylerin içselleştirilmiş cinsiyetçiliğin zararlı etkilerini fark etmeleri ve bununla etkili bir şekilde başa çıkmaları ruhsal, sosyal ve kişisel gelişimlerine katkı sağlayacaktır.

Abstract

In this study, the correlation between women’s internalized sexism levels and dating violence attitudes in intimate relationships was examined. The study group consisted of 466 female students studying at Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education. Data were collected with the “Internalized Sexism Scale” and “Attitudes towards Dating Violence in Intimate Relationships Scale”. The findings indicated substantial correlations between attitudes towards dating violence and the subdimensions of the internalized sexism scale, namely self-objectification, derogation, self-loss, and male primacy. It was concluded that there is no significant correlation between the internalized gender scale and attitude towards dating violence. The results revealed that the selfobjectification, derogation, and prioritizing of the male sub-dimensions of the internalized gender scale significantly predicted the attitude towards dating violence. The self-loss-sub-dimension did not predict dating violence at a significant level internalization of sexist attitudes is believed to contribute to women developing negative perceptions of themselves and other women. This situation poses the risk of exhibiting more passive attitudes toward opposing dating violence. Therefore, individuals acknowledging the harmful effects of internalized sexism and struggling to eliminate them will contribute to their spiritual, social, and personal growth.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Peker, A., Cingil, T., Yazıcı, Z. (2025). Kadınlarda İçselleştirilmiş Cinsiyetçilik ile Yakın İlişkilerde Flört Şiddetine Yönelik Tutum Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 181–208. https://doi.org/10.21798/kadem.2025.178

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (63)

  1. Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-015-0037-1
  2. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
  3. Bearman, S., & Amrhein, M. (2014). Girls, women, and internalized sexism. E. David (Ed.), Internalized oppression (ss. 191-297) içinde. Springer Publishing Company.
  4. Bearman, S., Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1(1), 10-47.
  5. Beaulaurier, R. L., Seff, L. R., Newman, F. L., & Dunlop, B. (2005). Internal barriers to help seeking for middle-aged and older women who experience intimate partner violence. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 17(3), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1300/j084v17n03_04
  6. Bozkur, B. (2020). Developing internalized sexism scale for women: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 5(11), 1981-2028. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.289
  7. Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574
  8. Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2014). Sanctioning resistance to sexual objectification: An integrative system justification perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 763-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12090
  9. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210
  10. Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S. (2023). Örnekleme yöntemleri. H. Özmen, O. Karamustafaoğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntemleri (ss. 56-78) içinde. Pegem Akademi.
  11. David, E. J. R. (2009). Internalized oppression, psychopathology, and cognitive behavioral therapy among historically oppressed groups. Journal of Psychological Practice, 15, 171-103.
  12. Davidson, M. M., & Gervais, S. J. (2015). Violence against women through the lens of objectification theory. Violence Against Women, 21(3), 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214568031
  13. Dehlin, A. J., & Galliher, R. V. (2019). Young women’s sexist beliefs and internalized misogyny: Links with psychosocial and relational functioning and political behavior. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN24.4.255
  14. DeKeseredy, W. S., Rennison, C. M., & Hall-Sanchez, A. K. (2019). The Routledge international handbook of violence studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270265
  15. Espelage, D. L., Ingram, K. M., Hong, J. S., & Merrin, G. J. (2022). Bullying as a developmental precursor to sexual and dating violence across adolescence: Decade in review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(4), 1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021104381
  16. Evans, K. E., Lee, H., Russell, K. N., Holmes, M. R., Berg, K. A., Bender, A. E., & Prince, D. M. (2022). Adolescent dating violence among youth exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Journal of Family Violence, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00289-y
  17. Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Braithwaite, S. R., & Pasley, K. (2008). Attitudes towards intimate partner violence in dating relationships. Psychological Asessment, 20(3), 260. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.260
  18. Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings-Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 271, 283-285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160
  19. Foshee, V. A., Dixon, K. S., Ennett, S. T., Moracco, K. E., Bowling, J. M., Chang, L. Y., & Moss, J. L. (2015). The process of adapting a universal dating abuse prevention program to adolescents exposed to domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(12), 2151-2173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552278
  20. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mc Graw Hill.
  21. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
  22. Fu, L., Tian, T., Lu, Z., Wang, B., Li, X., Zhang, W., Gao, Y., Sun, Y., & Zou, H. (2023). Burdens attributable to intimate partner violence in women aged 15 years or older-China, 1990-2019. China CDC Weekly, 5(16), 347. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2023.066
  23. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291-305.
  24. Gattino, S., De Piccoli, N., Fedi, A., Boza, M., & Rollero, C. (2018). A crosscultural study of biological, psychological, and social antecedents of self-objectification in Italy and Romania. Sex Roles, 78, 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0804-5
  25. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.56.2.109
  26. Gracia, E., & Merlo, J. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.040
  27. Gutierrez, B. C., & Leaper, C. (2024). Linking ambivalent sexism to violence-against-women attitudes and behaviors: A three-level meta-analytic review. Sexuality & Culture, 28, 851-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12119-023-10127-6
  28. Hammond, M. D., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416686213
  29. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
  30. Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 877-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00276.x
  31. Ifechelobi, C., & Ifechelobi, J. N. (2017). Gender discrimination: An analysis of the language of derogation. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(12), 23-27. https://doi.org/10. 9790/0837-2212062327
  32. Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Santhya, K. G. (2018). Preventing violence against women and girls in Bihar: Challenges for implementation and evaluation. Reproductive Health Matters, 26(52), 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1470430
  33. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence. Upne.
  34. Jonnson, M. R., Langille, J. I., & Walsh, Z. (2018). The role of objectification in the victimization and perpetration of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 33(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-15- 00085
  35. Katz-Wise, S. L., Budge, S. L., Lindberg, S. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2013). Individuation or identification? Self-objectification and the mother–adolescent relationship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312468425
  36. Kharat, P. (2014). Power, helplessness and compromising: Influences of resettlement on incidence of intimate partner violence (Order No. 3648642). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/power-helplessness-compromisinginfluences/docview/1651939618/se-2
  37. Le, T. P., Iwamoto, D. K., & Samee, A. A. (2021). Examining the association between sexism, self-objectification, empowerment, and alcohol-related problems: Pathways through drinking to cope. Addictive Behaviors, 120, 106964.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106964
  38. Lemonaki, E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Maio, G. R. (2015). Hostile sexism (de) motivates women’s social competition intentions: The contradictory role of emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 483-499. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/bjso.12100
  39. Liang, B., Tracy, A., Taylor, C. A., Williams, L. M., Jordan, J. V., & Miller, J. B. (2002). The relational health indices: A study of women’s relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471- 6402.00040
  40. LoStimolo, L. M. (2024). The internalization of sexual functioning towards the sexual self-schema (Order No. 31491200). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (3094629981). https://www.proquest. com/dissertations-theses/internalization-sexual-functioning-towardsself/docview/3094629981/se-2
  41. Lull, R. B., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). Immersed in violence: Presence mediates the effect of 3D violent video gameplay on angry feelings. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000062
  42. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
  43. Ostrov, J. M., & Perry, K. J. (2018). The role of gender in violent and aggressive behaviors. Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (ss. 382-398) içinde. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Overstreet, N. M., & Quinn, D. M. (2013). The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help seeking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2 012.746599
  45. Öztürk, R., Mete, D., Altıntaş, M., & Pekmez, M. A. (2021). Sağlık bilimleri öğrencilerinin flört şiddeti tutumlarının şiddete karşı profesyonel rolleri ile ilişkisi. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 15(1), 142-153. https://doi:10.21763/tjfmpc.807519
  46. Rogers, M. M., & Ali, P. (2023). Theorising gender-based violence. Gender-based violence: A comprehensive guide (s. 17-34) içinde. Springer International Publishing.
  47. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2021). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. Guilford Publications.
  48. Seçgin, L., Arslan, T., & Selçuk, K. T. (2022). Türkiye’de son beş yılda kadına yönelik şiddet: COVID-19 pandemisinin etkisi. Humanistic Perspective, 4(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.1025470
  49. Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Buchanan, N. T., & Miner, K. N. (2013). Derogation, discrimination, and (dis) satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312468727
  50. Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Bell, K. M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(3), 185-194. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.03.003
  51. Sikweyiya, Y., Addo-Lartey, A. A., Alangea, D. O., Dako-Gyeke, P., Chirwa, E. D., Coker-Appiah, D., Adanu, R. M. K., & Jewkes, R. (2020). Patriarchy and gender-inequitable attitudes as drivers of intimate partner violence against women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Public Health, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08825-z
  52. Smith, B. A., Thompson, S., Tomaka, J., & Buchanan, A. C. (2005). Development of the Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scales (IPVAS) with a predominantly Mexican American college sample. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 442-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739986305281233
  53. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  54. Szymanski, D. M., & Carr, E. R. (2008). The roles of gender role conflict and internalized heterosexism in gay and bisexual men’s psychological distress: Testing two mediation models. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.9.1.40
  55. Szymanski, D. M., & Henrichs-Beck, C. (2014). Exploring sexual minority women’s experiences of external and internalized heterosexism and sexism and their links to coping and distress. Sex Roles, 70(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5
  56. Tolman, D. L. (2022). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality (2. Baskı). Harvard University Press.
  57. Tolman, D. L., Impett, E. A., Tracy, A. J., & Michael, A. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1471-6402.2006.00265.x
  58. Toplu-Demirtaş, E., Hatipoğlu-Sümer, Z., & Fincham, F. (2017). Intimate partner violence in Turkey: The Turkish intimate partner violence attitude scale revised. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9852-9
  59. Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male: Psychological perspectives. Harper & Row.
  60. Williams Jr, R. D., & Gutierrez, A. (2022). Increased likelihood of forced sexual intercourse, sexual violence, and sexual dating violence victimization among sexual minority youth. Journal of Community Health, 47(2), 193- 200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-021-01033-9
  61. World Health Organization. (2021, March 9). Violence against women: Key facts.
  62. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/violence-against-women
  63. Zoellner, T., & Hedlund, S. (2010). Women’s self-silencing and depression in the socio-cultural context of Germany. D. C. Jack, A. Ali (Ed.), Silencing the self across cultures. (ss. 107-127) içinde. Oxford University Press.