SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Education Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

A CASE STUDY WITH ACADEMICIANS ABOUT USING AN INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD ON CLASSROOMS

LİSANS ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN AKILLI TAHTA KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE BİR NİTEL ÇALIŞMA

Nihan ARSLAN NAMLI
Mehmet ŞAHİN
Tuğçe KARATAŞ
Pages
23–35
Publication Date
2016-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, it will be a guide for all educators.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, it is aspiring to come up with academicians’ views on the IWB.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Interviews with five participants in the study have been done given a separate code for each participant in the transfer of sight "instructor_x" was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, it will be a guide for all educators.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İnteraktif Tahta · Etkileşimli Akıllı Tahta · Durum Çalışması

Abstract

In this research, it is aspiring to come up with academicians’ views on the IWB. Participant designated by purposive sampling, in order that academicians are using the IWB. Research performed by ten faculty members who work Çukurova University in the department of education. Interviews with five participants in the study have been done given a separate code for each participant in the transfer of sight "instructor_x" was used. A case study, which is one of the qualitative methods were chosen. In order to specify the reflection of the academicians, semi-structured interviews with six open-ended questions was carried out. The data were analyzed using content analysis method. The opinions of academicians have been provided withquotations and thoughts. The results of the research, visual elements, texts, simulations, and animations can be used more effectively with the help of IWB. These boards help to attract the attention and provide more active participation of students. As for implications, academicians should experience this technology and learn the successful usage about it. So, it will be a guide for all educators.

Özet

Bu çalışmada akıllı tahta ile ilgili akademisyenlerin görüşlerini koymak amaçlanmıştır. Katılımcılar amaçlı örnekleme yoluyla belirlenmiştir. Çukurova Üniversitesi-Eğitim Fakültesi’nde beş öğretim üyesi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma beş katılımcı ile yapılan görüşmelerde kullanılan "öğretim_elemanı_x" kodları ile kodlanmıştır. Araştırmada durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Altı açık uçlu soru ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler nitel çalışma yöntemlerinden biri olan içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Öneriler, ilgili araştırma bulgularına dayalı olarak araştırmacılar için yapılmıştır. Doküman analizi yapılmış olup, görsel unsurlar, metinler, simülasyonlar ve animasyonlar akıllı tahta yardımı ile daha etkin kullanılabilmektedir.Akademisyenler bu teknolojiyi verimli kullanmayı öğrenmelidirler.Yani, bu çalışma eğitimciler için yol gösterici bir kaynak olarakdüşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAMLI, N. A., ŞAHİN, M., KARATAŞ, T. (2016). A CASE STUDY WITH ACADEMICIANS ABOUT USING AN INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD ON CLASSROOMS. Education Sciences, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 23–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/985457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Beauchamp, G., (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 13(3), 327–348.
  2. Beauchamp, G., and Prakinson, J., (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(3), 97-103. BECTA, (2006). Teaching interactively with electronic whiteboards in the primary phase. Retrieved October 18, 2009, from. http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=25918.
  3. Beeland, W., (2002). Student engagement, visual learning, and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? Action Research Exchange, 7. Retrieved December 9, 2012, from Valdosta State University. Bell, M.A., (1998). Teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of the interactive electronic whiteboard in instruction. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/research_library/k- 12/teachers_perceptions_regarding_the_use_of_the_interactive_electronic_whiteboard_in_instruction.pdf. Bell, M.A., (2002). Teacher feature: Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker’s a dozen reasons! Teachers.net Gazette, 3 (1). Retrieved November 22, 2009, from. http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html
  4. Cogill, J., (2002). How is interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does it affect teachers and teaching. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from. www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_Interactive_ whiteboards_in_the_primary_school.pdf. Earle, S., (2004). Using and inler^ictive whiteboard to improve science-specific skills. Primary Science Review, 85, 18-20.
  5. Gillen, J., Staarman, J.K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., and Twiner, A., (2006). A “learning revolution”? Investigating pedagogic practices around interactive whiteboards in British Primary Classrooms. Area Conference (pp. 48-58). San Francisco: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology. Retrieved July 13, 2012, from. http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/iwb/AERA2006.pdf
  6. Gillen, J., Littleton, K., Twiner, A., Staarman, J., and Mercer, N., (2008). Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 348-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00269.x.
  7. Glover, D. and Miller, D., (2001). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary scho