SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Public and Private International Law Bulletin / 2023 / Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1

Application of the Principle of Non-Refoulement Within the Context of the European Convention on Human Rights

Non-Refoulement İlkesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uygulanması

Ceren Karagözoğlu(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0757-9767
Pages
313–351
Publication Date
2023-07-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the framework of this limitation, this study will examine the application of the principle of non-refoulement in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The principle of non-refoulement constitutes the foundation of the protection provided by refugee law and has an important scope of application within the framework of human rights treaties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While some human rights treaties clearly include provisions on the principle of non-refoulement, most treaties handle the principle in relation to other provisions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the framework of this limitation, this study will examine the application of the principle of non-refoulement in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Non-refoulement İlkesi · Mülteci Hukuku · İnsan Hakları Hukuku

Abstract

The principle of non-refoulement constitutes the foundation of the protection provided by refugee law and has an important scope of application within the framework of human rights treaties. While some human rights treaties clearly include provisions on the principle of non-refoulement, most treaties handle the principle in relation to other provisions. Application of the principle of non-refoulement is mainly handle alongside the right to administrative detention or the right to an effective remedy in connection with the deportation process in doctrine. However, the rights and freedoms evaluated within the scope of this principle are related to deficiencies or illegalities in the national legal order of the state in connection with a deportation, extradition, or refoulement decision. Application the principle of non-refoulement within the scope treaties is independent of these elements. It instead concerns the treatment to which the person being addressed will be subjected to in the territory of the state to which that person will be deported, extradited or refouled. Within the framework of this limitation, this study will examine the application of the principle of non-refoulement in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Özet

Mülteci hukuku ile sağlanan korumanın temelini oluşturan non-refoulement ilkesi, insan hakları sözleşmeleri çerçevesinde önemli bir uygulama alanına sahiptir. İnsan hakları sözleşmelerinin bir kısmında non-refoulement ilkesine açık bir biçimde yer verilirken önemli bir kısmında ilke, sözleşmelerin diğer hükümleri ile ilişkilendirilerek değerlendirilmektedir. İlkenin sözleşmeler kapsamında ortaya çıkan uygulaması ise öğretide ağırlıklı olarak kişinin gönderildiği ülkede maruz kalacağı muamele ile çerçevesinde yaşam hakkı, işkence yasağı ve sınırlı da olsa kişi özgürlüğü ve güvenliği hakkı, adil yargılanma hakkı, özel yaşama ve aile yaşamına saygı hakkı ve düşünce, vicdan, din özgürlüğü ve sınır dışı etme işlemi ile bağlantılı olarak etkili başvuru hakkı ve uygulanan idari gözetim tedbirine bağlı olarak kişi özgürlüğü ve güvenliği hakkı ile birlikte ele alınmaktadır. Ancak ilkenin sözleşmeler çerçevesindeki görünümü, sınır dışı etme işlemi ile bağlantılı olarak ortaya çıkan uygulamalardan, tedbirlerden ya da hukuki başvuru yollarından bağımsız, kişinin gönderileceği devlet ülkesinde maruz kalacağı muamele sebebiyle muhatap kaldığı duruma ilişkindir. Sınır dışı etme veya geri gönderme sonucunu doğuran eylem veya işleme muhatap kişinin tabi tutulduğu idari gözetim koşulları veya söz konusu eylem ve işleme karşı sahip olduğu adli ve idari başvuru hakkı çerçevesinde değerlendirilen hak ve özgürlükler ise temel olarak devletin ulusal hukuk düzeninde var olan eksiklikleri veya hukuka aykırılıkları konu almaktadır. Bu sebeple ilkenin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi bağlamında uygulanması çalışmada, kişinin gönderildiği devlet ülkesinde maruz kalacağı muamelenin Sözleşme ile koruma altına alınan hak ve özgürlükler bakımından değerlendirilmesi çerçevesinde incelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karagözoğlu, C., *, C. K. (2023). Application of the Principle of Non-Refoulement Within the Context of the European Convention on Human Rights. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1, 313–351. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2023.43.1203096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (97)

  1. Battjes H, ‘The Soering Threshold: Why Only Fundamental Values Prohibit Refoulement in ECHR Case Law’ (2009) 11 European Journal of Migration and Law 205-219. google scholar
  2. Blöndal EK, Amardöttir OM, ‘Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances’ (2018) 5(3) Oslo Law Review 147-174. google scholar
  3. Çiçekli B, Yabancılar ve Mülteci Hukuku (6th edn, Seçkin 2016). google scholar
  4. Den Heijer M, Europe and Extraterritorial Asylum (Hart Publishing, 2012). google scholar
  5. Den Heijer M, ‘Whose Rights and Which Rights? The Continuing Story of Non-Refoulement under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2008) 10(3) European Journal of Migration and Law 277-314. google scholar
  6. Ekşi N, ‘İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi’nin 6. Maddesinin Yabancıların Sınırdışı Edilmesine Uygulanıp Uygulanamayacağı Sorunu’ (2009) 29 (1-2) Milletlerarası Hukuk Bülteni 119-139. google scholar
  7. Ekşi N, Mahkeme Kararları Işığında Suçluların İltica Sistemi Dışında Bırakılması (Beta 2017). google scholar
  8. Ekşi N, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Abdolkhani ve Karimnia- Türkiye Davası Mülteci ve Sığınmacı Hukuku Açısından Değerlendirme (Beta 2010). google scholar
  9. Frenzen N, ‘Extraterritorial Refugee Protection’, The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law, Andre Nollkaemper (Ed.) (Cambridge University Press 2017). google scholar
  10. Gemalmaz MS, Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukuku Belgeleri I. Cilt- Bölgesel Sistemler (Legal Kitabevi 2011). google scholar
  11. Goodwin-Gill GS, ‘The Haitian Refoulement Case: A Comment’ (1994) 6(1) International Journal of Refugee Law 103-9. google scholar
  12. Hathaway JC, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005). google scholar
  13. ‘Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR): Pertinent Parts of October 28, 2005 Reiteration and further Amplification of Precautionary Measures (Detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba)’ (2006) 45(3) International Legal Materials 673-681 google scholar
  14. Kalin W, Das Prinzip des non-refoulement: das Verbot der Zurückweisung, Ausweisung und Auslieferung von Flüchtlingen in den Verfolgerstaat im Völkerrecht und im schweizerischen Landesrecht (Peter Lang International Academic Publishers 1982). google scholar
  15. Karagözoğlu C, İnsan Hakları Sözleşmelerinin Ülke Dışına Uygulanabilirliği Çerçevesinde Devletin Yetkisi ve Sorumluluğu (On İki Levha 2023). google scholar
  16. Konyalı G, Uluslararası Hukukta Sığınma Hakkı (Seçkin 2021). google scholar
  17. Lambert H, ‘The European Convention On Human Rights And The Protection of Refugees: Limits And Opportunities’ (2005) 24(2) Refugee Survey Quarterly 39-55. google scholar
  18. Lauterpacht E, Bethlehem D, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: Opinion’, Refugee Protection in International Law- UNHCR ’s Global Consultations on International Protection, Erika Feller,
  19. Volker Türk, Frances Nicholson (Eds.) (Cambridge University Press 2003). google scholar
  20. Noll G, ‘Delimiting and Justifying Protection under the ECHR’, Negotiating Asylum- The EUAcquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2000). google scholar
  21. Nowak M, ‘Obligations of States to Prevent and Prohibit Torture in an Extratemtorial Perspective’ Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations, Mark Gibney, Sigrun Skogly (Eds.) (University of Pennsylvania Press 2010). google scholar
  22. Odman MT, Tarihsel Gelişim Sürecinde Güncelleştirilmiş Mülteci Hukuku (Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de İlticanın Gelişim Süreci (Yetkin 2020). google scholar
  23. Robinson N, Convention relating to the status of refugees: Its History, Contents and Interpretation, A Commentary (Institut of Jewish Affaires, 1953). google scholar
  24. Solomon S, ‘Migrant boats on the high seas and their interception through psychologically coercive measures: Is there a case to extraterritorially apply human rights law?’ (2019) 37(1) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 36-49. google scholar
  25. The Refugee Convention 1951 The Travaux Preparatoires Analysed With A Commentary, By Dr. Paul Weis (1990). google scholar
  26. Toluner S, Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi (5th edn, Beta 1996). google scholar
  27. Topal AH, Mülteci Hukuku ve Silahlı Çatışma Kaynaklı Sığınmacılar (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
  28. Uzun E, ‘Geri Göndermeme İlkesinin Uluslararası Hukuktaki Konumu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2012) 8 (30) Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 25-58. google scholar
  29. Yüksel S, ‘Procedural aspects of the European Court of Human Right’s Assessment under Article google scholar
  30. 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Removal Cases’ (2022) 42 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin 777-790. google scholar
  31. Uluslararası Belgeler ve Yargı Kararları /International Documents and Judgments google scholar
  32. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p 137. google scholar
  33. Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p 267. google scholar
  34. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14, European Treaty Series - No. 5. google scholar
  35. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p 171 and vol. 1057, p 407. google scholar
  36. American Convention on Human Rights “Pact of San Jose, Da Costa Rica”, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1144, p 123. google scholar
  37. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1465, p 85. google scholar
  38. European Convention on Extradition, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 359, p 273. google scholar
  39. Convention on the Rights of the Child, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1577, p 3. google scholar
  40. Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 2241, p 480. google scholar
  41. UNHRC, (A/AC.96/898) Note on International Protection, 3 July 1998 12 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  42. UNHCR, Interception of Asylum-seekers and Refugees: The International Framework and Recommendations for a Comprehensive Approach, UN Doc. EC/50/SC/CRP.17 (9 June 2000). google scholar
  43. Cartagena Declaration on Refugees, Colloquium on the International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico and Panama 11 Eki 2022. google scholar
  44. Committee Against Torture, J.H.A. v Spain (Marine I), CAT/C/41/D/323/2007, 21.11.2008 www.refworld.org/cases,CAT,4a939d542.html> 12 Nisan 2021. google scholar
  45. Committee Against Torture, Comments by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the conclusions and recommendations (CAT/C/CR/33/3), (CAT/C/GBR/ CO/4/Add.1), (CAT/C/SR.627), (CAT/C/SR.624). google scholar
  46. CCPR, General Comment No. 20, Prohibition of Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Article 7), 10 March 1992, (HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I)). google scholar
  47. CCPR, General Comment No. 31 [80] The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, Adopted on 29 March 2004 (2187th meeting), (CCPR/C/21/ Rev.1/Add. 13)). google scholar
  48. CCPR, General Comment No. 36, Article 6 Right of life, CCPR/C/GC/36, 3 September 2019. google scholar
  49. ECtHR, 22414/93, 15.11.1996, Chahal v The United Kingdom 3 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
  50. ECtHR, 2947/06, 24.04.2008, Ismoilov and Others v Russia 3 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
  51. ECtHR, 27765/09, 23.02.2012, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy 20 Haziran 2020. google scholar
  52. ECtHR, 45653/99, 23.06.2008, Andreou v Turkey (As to The Admissibility) 23 Ağustos 2020). google scholar
  53. ECtHR, 8675/15, 8697/15, 03.10.2017, N.D., N.T v Spain 13 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  54. ECtHR, 8675/15, 8697/15, 13.02.2020, N.D., N.T. v Spain 13 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  55. ECtHR, 3599/18, 05.03.2020, M.N. and Others v Belgium 6 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  56. ECtHR, 59793/17, 11.12.2018, M.A. and Others v Lithuania 26 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  57. ECtHR, 40503/17; 42902/17; 43643/17, 23.07.2020, M.K. and Others v Poland 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  58. ECtHR, 18603/12, 15.09.2022, O.M. and D.S. v Ukraine 3 Ocak 2023. google scholar
  59. ECtHR, 51246/17, 08.07.2021, D.A. and Others v Poland 3 Kasım 2022. google scholar
  60. ECtHR, 13284/04, 08.11.2005, Bader and Kanbor v Sweden 30 Ocak 2021. google scholar
  61. ECtHR, 28761/1, 24.01.2014, Al-Nashiri v Poland 4 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
  62. ECtHR, 14038/88, 07.07.1989, Soering v The United Kingdom 29 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  63. ECtHR, 16643/09, 21.10.2014, Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece, para 212 3 Ekim 2022. google scholar
  64. ECtHR, 40035/98,11.07.2000 Jabari v Turkey 20 Şubat2021. google scholar
  65. ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden 2 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  66. ECtHR, 5560/19, 15.04.2021, K.I. v France 14 Aralık 2022. google scholar
  67. F.G. v Sweden, para 115; ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-161829. google scholar
  68. ECtHR, 28492/15; 49975/15, Khasanov And Rakhmanov v Russia 12 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  69. ECtHR, 30696/09, 20.01.2011, M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece 13 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  70. ECtHR, The European Court grants urgent interim measure in case concerning asylum- seeker’s imminent removal from the UK to Rwanda, 14.06.2022 14 Temmuz 2022. google scholar
  71. ECtHR, 41326/17, 8098/18, 8147/18, 8384/18, 10.03.2022, Shenturk and Others v Azerbaijan 11 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  72. ECtHR, 42367/98, 19.01.1999, Ould Barar v Sweden (As to The Admissibility) 22.05. 2022. google scholar
  73. ECtHR, 46605/07, 13.04.2010, Charahili v Turkey 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  74. ECtHR, 36370/08, 13.04.2010, Keshmiri v Turkey 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  75. ECtHR, 58182/14, 07.11.2017, K.I. v Russia 15 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  76. ECtHR, 21896/08, 19.01.2010, Z.N.S. v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  77. ECtHR, 36009/08, 15.06.2010, M.B. and Others v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  78. ECtHR, 15916/09, 13.07.2010, Dbouba v Turkey 14 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  79. ECtHR, 28127/09, 03.12.2013, Ghorbanov and Others v Turkey 27 Ocak 2021. google scholar
  80. ECtHR, 29217/12, 04.11.2014, Tarakhel v Switzerland 27 Ocak 2021. google scholar
  81. ECtHR, 37201/06, 28.02.2008, Saadi v Italy 7 Ağustos2022. google scholar
  82. ECtHR, 25904/07, 17.07.2008, NA. v The United Kingdom 15 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  83. ECtHR, 71555/01, 16.10.2001, Einhorn v France (As to The Admissibility) 22 Şubat 2022. google scholar
  84. ECtHR, 17341/03, 22.06.2004, F. v The United Kingdom (As to The Admissibility) 20 Şubat 2021. google scholar
  85. ECtHR, 46827/99, 46951/99, 04.02.2005, Mamatkulov and Askarov v Turkey 26 Şubat 2021. google scholar
  86. ECtHR, 8139/09, 17.01.2012, Othman (Abu Qatada) v The United Kingdom 3 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  87. ECtHR, 71537/14, 15.06.2017, Harkins v The United Kingdom 3 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  88. ECtHR, 44599/98, 06.02.2001, Bensaid v The United Kingdom 9 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  89. ECtHR, 26565/05, 27.052008, N. v The United Kingdom 12 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  90. ECtHR, 41738/10, 13.12.2016, Paposhvili v Belgium 12 Ağustos 2022. google scholar
  91. ECtHR, 27034/05, 28.02.2006, Z. and T. v The United Kingdom 6 Ocak 2021. google scholar
  92. ECtHR, 29836/20, 26.04.2022, M.A.M. v Switzerland 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  93. HRC, Communication No. 470/1991, 30.07.1993, Kindler v Canada 11 Şubat 2021. google scholar
  94. HRC, Communication No. 1539/2006, 21.09.2009, Mohammad Munaf v Romania 22 Eylül 2021). google scholar
  95. Inter-Am.C.H.R, 20.03.2012, Djamel Ameziane v United States, Admissibility Report No. 17/12 25 Ocak 2021. google scholar
  96. Inter-Am.C.H.R., 13.03.1997, The Haitian Centre for Human Rights et al. v United States, Report No. 51/96, Case 10.675, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev at 550 (1997). google scholar
  97. Inter-Am.Ct.H.R, 25.11.2013, Pacheco Tineo Family v Plurinational State of Bolivia 25 Ocak 2021. google scholar