SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

The Problem of the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Aid in the Context of the 2002 European Union Directive and Framework Decision on Strengthening the Criminal Framework to Prevent the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry, Transit and Residence

İzinsiz Giriş, Geçiş ve İkametin Kolaylaştırılmasını Önlemek İçin Cezai Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin 2002 tarihli Avrupa Birliği Direktifi ve Çerçeve Kararı Bağlamında İnsani Yardımın Cezalandırılabilirliği Sorunu

Meral Balcı(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi)0000-0002-6089-0952
Ceren Karagözoğlu(Sakarya Üniversitesi, Hukuk Fakültesi)0000-0003-0757-9767
Pages
198–229
Publication Date
2024-02-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, not expanding the limits of criminal law’s ability to intervene in immigration law is important, being an area where administrative regulations are effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The legal regulations the European Union (EU) has adopted to prevent illegal migration are becoming increasingly harsh.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The EU Council Directive 2002/90/EC, referred to here as the Facilitators Directive, is one of the most important examples of this.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, not expanding the limits of criminal law’s ability to intervene in immigration law is important, being an area where administrative regulations are effective.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yasa dışı göç · direktif · insani yardım

Abstract

The legal regulations the European Union (EU) has adopted to prevent illegal migration are becoming increasingly harsh. The practice that has developed within the framework of the regulations weakens the legal legitimacy of the measures taken. In particular, trying to control the illegal entry or illegal stay of foreigners in a country through the tools of criminal law causes problems in many respects. The EU Council Directive 2002/90/EC, referred to here as the Facilitators Directive, is one of the most important examples of this. This study will examine the acts that constitute a criminal offense under the Facilitators Directive within the framework of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants, especially regarding the ability to punish humanitarian assistance. In determining the framework of the smuggling of migrants in terms of criminal law, this article will attempt to put forth an approach based on the principles of criminal law and human rights. The intensity of the sanctions imposed on illegal migration from the perspective of the protection of state borders results in the violation of state obligations arising from international conventions to which states are a party. Therefore, not expanding the limits of criminal law’s ability to intervene in immigration law is important, being an area where administrative regulations are effective.

Özet

Yasa dışı göçü önlemek amacıyla Avrupa Birliği tarafından kabul edilen hukuki düzenlemeler, gittikçe daha sert hale gelmekte ve düzenlemeler çerçevesinde gelişen uygulama alınan tedbirlerin hukuki meşruiyetini zayıflatmaktadır. Özellikle yabancıların ülkeye yasa dışı girişi veya ülkede yasa dışı kalışı meselesinin ceza hukuku araçlarıyla kontrol altında tutulmaya çalışılması birçok açıdan sorun ortaya çıkmasına neden olmaktadır. 2002 tarihli Kolaylaştırıcılar Direktifi bunun en önemli örneklerindendir. Çalışmada söz konusu Direktif kapsamında suç teşkil eden fiiller, Sınıraşan Örgütlü Suçlara Karşı Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi’ne Ek Kara, Deniz ve Hava Yoluyla Göçmen Kaçakçılığına Karşı Protokol çerçevesinde özellikle insani yardımın cezalandırılabilirliği konusu üzerinden ele alınacaktır. Göçmen kaçakçılığının ceza hukuku bakımından çerçevesinin belirlenmesinde ceza hukuku esasları ve insan hakları hukuku temelli bir yaklaşım ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır. Zira yasa dışı göçe yönelik uygulanan yaptırımların yoğunluğunun, salt devlet sınırlarının korunması perspektifiyle ele alınması, insan hakları hukuku, mülteci hukuku ve deniz hukuku başta olmak üzere devletin taraf olduğu uluslararası sözleşmelerden doğan yükümlülüklerinin ihlali ile sonuçlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla idari düzenlemelerin etkin olduğu bir alan olan göç hukukunda ceza hukuku müdahalesinin sınırlarının genişletilmemesi önem arz etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balcı, M., Karagözoğlu, C. (2024). The Problem of the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Aid in the Context of the 2002 European Union Directive and Framework Decision on Strengthening the Criminal Framework to Prevent the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry, Transit and Residence. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 198–229. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2023-1311938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (118)

  1. Akbulut B, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (9. Baskı Adalet, 2022). google scholar
  2. David Alan Sklansky, ‘Crime, Immigration, And Ad Hoc Instrumentalism’ (2012) 15(2) New Criminal Law Review 157-223. google scholar
  3. Aliverti A, ‘Making people criminal: The role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement’ (2012) 16(4) Theoretical Criminology, 417-434. google scholar
  4. Aljehani A, ‘The Legal Definition of the Smuggling of Migrants in Light of the Provisions of the Migrant Smuggling Protocol’ (2015) 79(2) The Journal of Criminal Law 122-137. google scholar
  5. Allsopp J, ‘The European Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: Measuring the Impact on the Whole Community’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
  6. A Manifesto on European Criminal Policy’ (European Criminal Policy Initiative), Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 2009 (12) 707-716. google scholar
  7. Arsava AF, ‘AB Hukukunda Mülteci ve Göç Sorunu’, (2021) 155 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 461-477. google scholar
  8. Aytekin İnceoğlu A, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 14(175-176) 14 Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 387-432. google scholar
  9. Aziani A, ‘The heterogeneity of human smugglers: A Refection on The Use of Concepts in Studies on The Smuggling of Migrants’, (2021) Trends in Organized Crime 13 Mart 2022. google scholar
  10. Barnes R, ‘The International Law Of The Sea And Migration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Martinus Nijhoff 2010). google scholar
  11. Başaran T, ‘Saving Lives At Sea: Security, Law And Adverse Effects’ (2014) 16 European Journal of Migration and Law, 365-387. google scholar
  12. Başaran T, ‘The Saved and The Drowned: Governing Indifference in The Name of Security’ 2015 46(3) Security Dialogue, 205-220. google scholar
  13. Baykal S/ Göçmen İ ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunun Kaynakları Bakımından Normlar Hiyerarşisi’, Prof. Dr. Erdal Onar’a Armağan (Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 2013). google scholar
  14. Bayram MH, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Dersleri, 7. Baskı (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2022). google scholar
  15. Bilgin AB, ‘Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Hukukun Genel İlkeleri’ (2016) LXXIV (1) İÜHFM, 73-94. google scholar
  16. Bostancı Bozbayındır G, ‘Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda göçmen kaçakçılığı suçu’, (2015) Disiplinlerarası Göç ve Göç Politikaları Sempozyumu, 377-405. google scholar
  17. Carrera S/ Mitsilegas V/ Allsopp J/ Vosyliute L, Policing Humanitarianism: EU Policies Against Human Smuggling and Their Impact on Civil Society (Oxford, London 2019). google scholar
  18. Conte C/ Vosyliute L, Crackdown on NGOs assisting refugees and other migrants, Policy Option Brief (2019). google scholar
  19. De Massol de Rebetz R/ Ölçer P, ‘Aggravated Migrant Smuggling in a Transit Migration Context, Criminal Victimization under ECtHR Positive Obligations Case Law’ (2022) 71 Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul, 413-480. google scholar
  20. Den Hejer M, ‘Europe beyond its Borders: Refugee and Human Rights Protection in Extraterritorial Immigration Control’ Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Njhoff, 2010). google scholar
  21. Doğan K, Göçmen Kaçakçılığı, (3. Bası, Seçkin 2021). google scholar
  22. Duff RA, ‘A Criminal Law for Citizens’ (2010) 14(3) Theoretical Criminology, 1-13. google scholar
  23. Ekşi N, Mahkeme Kararları Işığında Suçluların İltica Sistemi Dışında Bırakılması (Beta 2017). google scholar
  24. Erel K, ‘Yargıtay Kararları Işığında Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2007) 71, TBB Dergisi, 264- 299. google scholar
  25. Fekete L, Europe: Crimes of Solidarity, (2009) 50(4) Race & Class, 83-97. google scholar
  26. Fekete L /Webber F/ Edmond-Pettitt A, Humanitarianism: the unacceptable face of solidarity, Institute of Race Relations (London 2017). google scholar
  27. Gallagher A, ‘Human Rights and the New UN Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis’ (2001) 23(4) Human Rights Quarterly, 975-1004. google scholar Gerver M, ‘Decriminalizing People Smuggling’ 2021 8 (1) Moral Philosophy and Politics, 131-153. google scholar
  28. Goodwin-Gill GS, ‘The Haitian Refoulement Case: A Comment’ (1994) 6(1) International Journal of Refugee Law, 103-9. google scholar
  29. Guild E, ‘Assessing Migration Management and the Role of Criminal Law’ Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’ Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas and Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020). google scholar
  30. Husak D, ‘The Criminal Law as Last Resort’ (2004) 24(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 207-235. google scholar
  31. Kangal ZT, ‘Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçu’ (2019) 21 Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 221-277. google scholar
  32. Kangal ZT, ‘Anayasal Bir Güvence Olarak Suçta ve Cezada Kanunîlik İlkesi’ (2011) 17, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, 61-106. google scholar
  33. Karagözoğlu C, İnsan Hakları Sözleşmelerinin Ülke Dışına Uygulanabilirliği Çerçevesinde Devletin Yetkisi ve Sorumluluğu (Oniki Levha 2023). google scholar
  34. Karagözoğlu C, ‘Non-Refoulement İlkesinin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uygulanması’ (2023) 43 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, (). google scholar
  35. Kaya İ, Uluslararası Hukukta Temel Belgeler, (4. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2020). google scholar
  36. Kızılsümer Özer D, ‘Denizden Gelen Sığınmacılar ve Uluslararası Hukuk’ (2007) 10(3) Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 75-95. google scholar
  37. Koca M/ Üzülmez İ, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (15. Bs, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
  38. Landry Rachel, ‘The ‘humanitarian smuggling’ of refugees Criminal offence or moral obligation?’, Refugee Studies Centre Working Papers Series No. 119 (2016). google scholar
  39. Militello V/ Spena A, ‘Between Criminalization and Protection The Italian Way of Dealing with Migrant Smuggling and Trafficking within the European and International Context’, Transnational Crime, Ed. Valsamis Mitsilegas, (2018). google scholar
  40. Mitsilegas V, ‘The Normative Foundations of the Criminalisation of Human Smuggling. Exploring the Fault Lines between European and International Law’ (2018) 294 Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 1-19. google scholar
  41. Obokata T, ‘Smuggling of Human Beings from a Human Rights Perspective: Obligations of Non-State and State Actors under International Human Rights Law’ (2005) 17 (2) International Journal of Refugee Law, 394-415. google scholar
  42. Obokata T, ‘The Legal Framework Concerning the Smuggling of Migrants at Sea under the UN Protocol on the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’, Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges, Eds. Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, (Leiden, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010). google scholar
  43. Ocotrinillo PR, Non-criminalization of smuggled migrants (Notes on the interpretation of article 5 of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air), UNCHR (2014). google scholar
  44. Orakhelashvili A, ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 14(3)The European Journal of International Law, 529-568. google scholar
  45. Ouwerkerk JW, ‘Criminalisation as a Last Resort: A National Principle Under the Pressure of Europeanisation?’ (2012) 3 (3-4) New Journal of European Criminal Law, 228-241. google scholar
  46. Önder A/ Saydam M, ‘TCK’nın 79. Maddesinde Düzenlenen Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunun Sınıraşan Örgütlü Suçlara Karşı Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi’ne Ek Kara, Deniz ve Hava Yoluyla Göçmen Kaçakçılığına Karşı Protokol Hükümleri Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi’ (2015) XIX (1-2) EÜHFD, 1-15. google scholar
  47. Özbek VÖ/ Doğan K/ Bacaksız P, Türk Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler (Seçkin, 2022). google scholar
  48. Pacurar A, ‘Smuggling, Detention and Expulsion of Irregular Migrants A Study on International Legal Norms, Standards and Practices’ (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law, 259-283. google scholar
  49. Parkin J, ‘The Criminalisation of Migration in Europe’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 61 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2013). google scholar
  50. Petzsche A, ‘Die Kriminalisierung von Vorbereitungshandlungen - Abschied vom Tatstrafrecht?’ (2019)131(3) ZSTW, 576-594. google scholar
  51. Provera M, ‘The criminalization of irregular migration in the European Union’ CEPS Policy Brief No 80 (Centre for European Policy Studies 2015). google scholar
  52. Rodrik D, ‘Solidarity at The Border: How The Eu and Us Criminalize Aid to Migrants’ (2021) 39(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law, 81-126. google scholar
  53. Schloenhardt A/Jessica ED, ‘Twelve years on: revisiting the UN Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air’ (2012) 61(1) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 129-156. google scholar
  54. Spena A, ‘Human Smuggling and Irregular Immigration in the EU: From Complicity to Exploitation?’ Eds. Sergio Carrera/Elspeth Guild, Irregular Migration, Trafficking and Smuggling of Human Beings Policy Dilemmas in the EU (2016). google scholar
  55. Spena A, ‘Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy, 635-657. google scholar
  56. Stumpf J, ‘The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, And Sovereign Power’ 2006 56 (2) American University Law Review, 365-419. google scholar
  57. Taşkın OE, ‘Son Çare (Ultima Ratio) Olarak Ceza Hukuku’ 2016 (59-91) Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 59-91. google scholar
  58. Tazzioli M/Walters W, ‘Migration, solidarity and the limits of Europe’ (2019) 9(1) Global Discourse, 175-190. google scholar
  59. Tezcan D/Erdem MR/Önok M, Teorik ve Pratik Ceza Özel Hukuku (20. Bası, Seçkin 2022). google scholar
  60. Toluner S, Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi (5. Bası, Beta Yayınları 1996). google scholar
  61. Topal AH, Mülteci Hukuku ve Silahlı Çatışma Kaynaklı Sığınmacılar (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
  62. Ünver Y, Ceza Hukukunda Korunması Amaçlanan Hukuksal Değer (Seçkin Yayınevi 2003). google scholar
  63. Van Meerbeeck J, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: From Certainty to Trust’ (2006) 41(41) European Law Review, 275-288. google scholar
  64. Yaşar E, ‘Ceza Hukukunun İktidarı Sınırlama Fonksiyonu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2021) 156, TBB Dergisi, 33-61. google scholar
  65. Yaşar Y/Güneş U, ‘Uluslararası Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Göçmen Kaçakçılığı Suçunda ‘Maddi Menfaat Elde Etme Amacı’ Kavramı’ (2022) 28 (1) Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 240-255. google scholar
  66. Yüksel S, ‘Procedural aspects of the European Court of Human Right’s Assessment under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Removal Cases’ (2022) 42 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 777-790. google scholar
  67. Zedner L, ‘Is the Criminal Law Only for Citizens? A Problem at the Borders of Punishment’, Eds. Katja Franko Aas,Mary Bosworth The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion (Oxford, 2013). google scholar
  68. Zurilia S, ‘Is that a Smuggler?: The Blurring Line between Facilitating Illegal Immigration and Providing Humanitarian Assistance at the European Borders” Controlling Immigration Through Criminal Law: European and Comparative Perspectives on ‘Crimmigration’, Eds. Gian Luigi Gatta, Valsamis Mitsilegas, Stefano Zirulia (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2020). google scholar
  69. Ryan Devereaux, Scott Warren Not Guilty in Trialfor Border Humanitarian Work, INTERCEPT (Nov. 23, 2019) 30 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  70. Case T-115/94, 22.01.1997, Opel Austria GmbH v Council of the European Union 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
  71. Case C-329/11, 06.12.2011, Alexandre Achughbabian <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62011CJ0329 28 Mart 2023 google scholar
  72. Committee Against Torture, J.H.A. v Spain (Marine I), CAT/C/41/D/323/2007, 21.11.2008 12 Nisan 2022. google scholar
  73. ECtHR, 59793/17, 11.12.2018, M.A. and Others v Lithuania 26 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  74. ECtHR, 51246/17, 08.07.2021, D.A. and Others v Poland 3 Kasım 2022. google scholar
  75. ECtHR, 40503/17; 42902/17; 43643/17, 23.07.2020, M.K. and Others v Polan <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-203840< 10 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  76. ECtHR, 41326/17, 8098/18, 8147/18, 8384/18, 10.03.2022, Shenturk and Others v Azerbaijan 11 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  77. ECtHR, 5560/19, 15.04.2021, K.I. v France 14 Aralık 2022. google scholar
  78. ECtHR, 59166/12, 23.08.2016, J.K. and Others v Sweden 2 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  79. ECtHR, 27765/09, 23.02.2012, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy 20 Haziran 2020. google scholar
  80. ECtHR, 16643/09, 21.10.2014, Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece 22 Eylül 2022. google scholar
  81. ECtHR, 29681/08, 10.11.2011, Affaire Mallah v. France 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  82. ECtHR, 41226/09, 14.11. 2017, Işıkırık v. Turkey Kararı, para 56-58 <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178506 22 Mart 2023. google scholar
  83. HRC, 13.03.2020, Communication No. 3043/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Malta 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
  84. HRC, 04.11.2020, Communication No. 3042/2017, A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy 30 Ağustos 2021. google scholar
  85. HRC, Communication No. 2343/2014, 23.07.2015, H.E.A.K. v. Denmark, CCPR/C/114/D/2343/2014 12 Mayıs 2022. google scholar
  86. Inter-Am.Ct.H.R, 19.08.2014, Advisory Opinion OC- 21/14, Requested By The Argentine Republic, The Federative Republic Of Brazil, The Republic Of Paraguay And The Oriental Republic Of Uruguay (Rights And Guarantees Of Children In The Context Of Migration And/Or In Need Of International Protection) para 219, https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/resumen_seriea_21_eng.pdf, 22 Ocak 2023. google scholar
  87. Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011) 10.11.2011) (Press Release) 12 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  88. Conviction with absolute discharge for facilitating unauthorised residence did not breach the Convention, (ECHR 238 (2011)) (Press Release). google scholar
  89. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) (2012) OJ C326. google scholar
  90. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p 137. google scholar
  91. Convention on the High Seas, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 450, p. 11. google scholar
  92. International Convention on Salvage (1989), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1953.pdf., Art 10. google scholar
  93. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1974), United Nations, Treaty Series, 1184, 1185 (p.2). google scholar
  94. International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (1979), United Nations, Treaty Series, v1405.pdf. google scholar
  95. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, Treaty Series, vol. 2220, p. 3. google scholar
  96. Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2241, p. 507. google scholar
  97. Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 606, p 267. google scholar
  98. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), United Nations, Treaty Series, vol.1833. google scholar
  99. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155, p. 331. google scholar
  100. CCPR, General Comment No. 36, Article 6 Right of life (CCPR/C/GC/36) 3 September 2019. google scholar
  101. Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, (CMW/C/GC/5) 21 July 2022. google scholar
  102. Criminalization of humanitarian and other support and assistance to migrants and the defence of their human rights in the EU (International Commission of Jurists, 22April 2022). google scholar
  103. CoE, ‘Using Criminal Law To Restrict The Work Of Ngos Supporting Refugees And Other Migrants In Council Of Europe Member States, Thematic Study prepared by Dr Carla Ferstman on behalf of the Expert Council on NGO Law of the Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe’, CONF/EXP(2019)1, December 2019. google scholar
  104. Directive 2008/115/EC, Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, OJEU, 24.12.2008 google scholar
  105. Directive 2013/32/EU, Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of 26 June 2013 On Common Procedures For Granting And Withdrawing International Protection (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union (29.06.2013). google scholar
  106. General comment No. 5 (2021) on migrants’ rights to liberty and freedom from arbitrary detention and their connection with other human rights, 21 July 2022 (CMW/C/GC/5). google scholar
  107. Human Rights Council, Human rights and international solidarity, Report of the Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity (Forty-first session 24 June- 12 July 2019) (A/HRC/41/44), 16 April 2019. google scholar
  108. IMO, Maritime Safety Committee, Guidelines on the Treatment of Persons Rescued At Sea, Resolution MSC.167(78), 20 May 2004. google scholar
  109. Legislative Guide for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocols Thereto (United Nations: New York, 2004). google scholar
  110. Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, “Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants”, 2016. google scholar
  111. Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (codification), Official Journal of the European Union (23.03.2016) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32016R0399, 23 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  112. Opening statement by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council, 9 September 2019 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  113. The Schengen acquis - Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, Official Journal of the European Communities, 22/09/2000. google scholar
  114. United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-fifth session (Agenda item 105), Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime on the work of its first to eleventh sessions, Interpretative notes for the official records (travaux preparatoires) of the negotiation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto (A/55/383/Add.1) 3 November 2000. google scholar
  115. UNODC, Legislative Guide For The Implementation Of The Protocol Against The Smuggling Of Migrants By Land, Sea And Air, Supplementing The United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (Part Three). google scholar
  116. UNHCR, Background Note on the Protection of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees Rescued at Sea, 11 April 2002. google scholar
  117. UNHCR, General legal considerations: search-and-rescue operations involving refugees and migrants at sea, November 2017 2 Mayıs 2023. google scholar
  118. Convention on the High Seas, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 450, p. 11. google scholar