Journals / NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

CONTRIBUTION OF JOINT RESEARCH STATIONS TO TÜRKİYE’S ANTARCTIC VISION IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE DIPLOMACY

BİLİM DİPLOMASİSİ BAĞLAMINDA ORTAK ARAŞTIRMA İSTASYONLARININ TÜRKİYE’NİN ANTARKTİKA VİZYONUNA KATKISI

Pages
232–250
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study conducted with the qualitative research and analysis method, it was concluded that with the creation of a multinational joint research station, Türkiye will strengthen its relations within the scope of science diplomacy and contribute positively to the Antarctic vision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a phenomenon of the 21st century, the importance of science diplomacy is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Science diplomacy continues to have greater importance for Türkiye, which has increased its interest in Antarctica in recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study conducted with the qualitative research and analysis method, it was concluded that with the creation of a multinational joint research station, Türkiye will strengthen its relations within the scope of science diplomacy and contribute positively to the Antarctic vision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antarktika · Bilim Diplomasisi · Antarktika Antlaşmalar Sistemi

Abstract

As a phenomenon of the 21st century, the importance of science diplomacy is increasing. Actors in the international system give more importance to science diplomacy and create new institutions. Due to its economic, scientific, and technological developments and increasing global influence, Türkiye gives more place to science diplomacy within diplomacy. Science diplomacy continues to have greater importance for Türkiye, which has increased its interest in Antarctica in recent years. In this study, the studies within the scope of science diplomacy in Antarctica and the situation of joint research stations in this context in the historical process were analyzed by examining science diplomacy in Antarctica. The aim of this study is to reveal the possible contributions of the establishment of a joint research station under the umbrella of the Organization of Turkic States, which developed in parallel with Türkiye's Antarctic expansion and increased cooperation in the scientific field as well as in various fields, to Türkiye and the members of the Organization within the scope of science diplomacy. In the study conducted with the qualitative research and analysis method, it was concluded that with the creation of a multinational joint research station, Türkiye will strengthen its relations within the scope of science diplomacy and contribute positively to the Antarctic vision.

Özet

21. yüzyılın olgusu olarak bilim diplomasisi önemini gittikçe artırmaktadır. Uluslararası sistemdeki aktörler bilim diplomasisine daha fazla önem vermekte ve kurumsal olarak yeni oluşumlar meydana getirmektedir. Türkiye ekonomik, bilimsel ve teknolojik gelişmesine ve artan küresel etkisine bağlı olarak diplomasi içinde bilim diplomasisine de artan düzeyde yer vermektedir. Son yıllarda Antarktika’ya olan ilgisini artıran Türkiye açısından bilim diplomasisinin daha büyük önemi bulunmaktadır. Çalışmada bilim diplomasisi, Antarktika özelinde irdelenerek, tarihi süreçte Antarktika’da bilim diplomasisi kapsamındaki çalışmalar ve bu kapsamda ortak araştırma istasyonlarının durumu analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin Antarktika açılımı ile paralel bir süreçte gelişen ve çeşitli alanlarda olduğu gibi bilimsel alanda da iş birliğini artıran Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı çatısı altında ortak araştırma istasyonu kurulmasının bilim diplomasisi kapsamında Türkiye ve Teşkilat üyelerine muhtemel katkılarını ortaya koymaktır. Nitel araştırma ve analiz yöntemiyle yürütülen çalışmada Türkiye’nin çok uluslu ortak bir araştırma istasyonunu hayata geçirmekle bilim diplomasisi kapsamında ilişkilerini güçlendireceği ve Antarktika vizyonuna olumlu katkı sağlayacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKYAY, F., UYSAL, A. C., KÖKYAY, N. E. (2023). CONTRIBUTION OF JOINT RESEARCH STATIONS TO TÜRKİYE’S ANTARCTIC VISION IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE DIPLOMACY. NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 232–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/950435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AAAS (2008), “Center for Science Diplomacy”, https://www.aaas.org/programs/center-science-diplomacy., 14.02.2022. AWI (Alfred Wegener Institute) (t.y.), “Mosaic in Number”, https://mosaic-expedition.org/expedition/mosaic-in-numbers/., 10.02.2022.
  2. BBC (2012), “Argentina angry after Antarctic territory named after Queen”, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-20822582., 16.02.2022.
  3. Beyondepica (2022), “European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA)”, https://www.beyondepica.eu/en/., 01.02.2022.
  4. CERN (2022), “Who Are We?”, https://home.cern/about/who-we-are/our-governance/member-states., 05.03.2022.
  5. CALM (2010), “Census of Antarctic Marine Life”, http://www.coml.org/census-antarctic-marine-life-caml/., 20.02.2022.
  6. Colglazier, E.W., (2018), “Science Diplomacy and Future Worlds”, Science & Diplomacy, 7 (3), https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2018/science-diplomacy-and-future-worlds., 01.03.2022.
  7. COMNAP (2017), “Antarctic Station Catalogue”, https://static1.squarespace.com /static/61073506e9b0073c7eaaf464/t/611497cc1ece1b43f0eeca8a/1628739608968/COMNAP_Antarctic_Station_Catalogue.pdf., 06.03.2022.
  8. Constantinou, C.M. ve Der Derian, J., (2010), “Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy”, Constantinou, Costas M. ve James Der Derian (Der.), içinde, Sustainable diplomacies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-22.
  9. Dastidar, P.G. ve Ramachandran S., (2008), “Intellectual Structure of Antarctic Science: A 25-Years Analysis”, Scientometrics, 77 (3): 389–414.
  10. EC, DG for Research and Innovation (2016), Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe (Brüksel: Publications Office), https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/552370., 22.03.2022.
  11. Erb, K.A., (2011), “International Collaboration in the Antarctic for Global Science”, Berkman, Paul Arthur, Michael A.Lang, David W. H. Walton, ve Oran R. Young, (der.) içinde, Science Diplomacy Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces, Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian İnstitution, 265-270.
  12. EU-PolarNet (2022) “About EU-PolarNet 2”, https://eu-polarnet.eu/about/#objectives_eu-polarnet., 05.04.2022.
  13. European Polar Board (2022), “European Polar Infrastructure Database”, https://www.europeanpolarboard.org/infrastructure/., 22.05.2022.
  14. Fedoroff, N.V., (2009), “Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century”, Cell, 136 (1), 9-11.
  15. Friedman, T.L., (2007), The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Picador. Gluckman, P.D., Turekian, V.C., Grimes