Journals / Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Jealousy in close relationships: Personal, relational and situational variables

Yakın ilişkilerde kıskançlık: Bireysel, ilişkisel ve durumsal değişkenler

Pages
181–191
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, relational type, self-esteem, age, relational satisfaction, and sex are higly correlated with jealousy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, the effects of personal, situational, and relational variables (such as age, gender, gender role orientation, duration of relationship, relational satisfaction, and physical attractiveness of the partner) on jealousy are investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A sample of 454 individuals currently involved in dating or marital relationships (48 % married, 52 % unmarried) completed the Romantic Jealousy Questionnaire, Bem Sex Role Inventory, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, relational type, self-esteem, age, relational satisfaction, and sex are higly correlated with jealousy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uyum · psikolojik · Cinsiyet kimliği

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the effects of personal, situational, and relational variables (such as age, gender, gender role orientation, duration of relationship, relational satisfaction, and physical attractiveness of the partner) on jealousy are investigated. Methods: A sample of 454 individuals currently involved in dating or marital relationships (48 % married, 52 % unmarried) completed the Romantic Jealousy Questionnaire, Bem Sex Role Inventory, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Stepwise regression analyses and 2 (gender) x2 (gender role orientation) x2 (relational type) ANOVA?s were submitted for analyzing the data. Results: Analysis indicated that unmarried people reported higher levels of jealousy than married people (F1-446 = 5.029). Married women reported less jealousy than unmarried women and married women reported more jealousy than married men. Age, relational satisfaction level, expectation level about the duration of the relationship, and physical attractiveness of the partner were unique predictors of the reported level of jealousy (R2 = 0.12; adjusted R2 = 0.11; P < 0.05). Women reported that they have more physical, emotional, and cognitive responses to jealousy compared to men. Women used more constructive (F1-446 = 6.27) and less destructive strategies than men (F1-446 = 6.27). Unmarried people used more destructive strategies than married people (F1-446 = 3.84). Age, self-esteem, and the duration of the relationship were unique predictors of coping strategies. Conclusion: The present study revealed that jealousy was a multidimensional variable. In particular, relational type, self-esteem, age, relational satisfaction, and sex are higly correlated with jealousy.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yakın ilişkilerde kıskançlıkla yaş, cinsiyet, cinsiyet rolü yönelimi, benlik saygısı, ilişkinin türü, eşi fiziksel olarak çekici bulma düzeyi gibi çeşitli bireysel, ilişkisel ve durumsal değişkenler arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Örneklem, çalışma sırasında yakın ilişkisi olan 454 kişiden (% 48?i evli, % 52?si evli olmayan) oluşmaktadır. Veriler Romantik Kıskançlık Ölçeği, Bem Cinsiyet Rolü Envanteri ve Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmış, varyans ve regresyon analizleriyle çözümlenmiştir. Anlamlılık düzeyi olarak p<0.05 kabul edilmiştir. Bulgular: Analiz sonuçlarına göre evli olmayan bireyler kendilerini evlilerden (F1-446=5.029) daha kıskanç bulmakta; evli olmayan kadınlar evli kadınlardan, evli kadınlar da evli erkeklerden daha yüksek düzeyde kıskançlık belirtmektedirler. Yaş, ilişkinin geleceğine yönelik beklenti düzeyi, ilişkisel doyum ve eşini fiziksel olarak çekici bulma düzeyi kıskançlık düzeyini en iyi yordayan değişkenlerdir (Ayarlanmış R2=0.11). Kıskançlık durumunda kadınlar erkeklerden, evli olmayanlar evlilerden daha güçlü tepkiler vermektedirler. Kıskançlıkla, kadınlar erkeklerden daha yapıcı, erkeklerse kadınlardan daha yıkıcı yöntemlerle (F1-446= 6.27) başetmektedirler. Sonuç: Bu araştırmada kıskançlığın çok boyutluluğu irdelenmiş, ilişkinin türü, benlik saygısı, yaş, ilişkisel doyum, cinsiyet gibi bireysel ve ilişkisel değişkenlerle ilişkileri ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, H. A., DÖNMEZ, A. (2006). Jealousy in close relationships: Personal, relational and situational variables. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 181–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/91979

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Andersen PA, Eloy SV (1995) Romantic jealousy and relational satisfaction: A look at the impact of jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 8: 77-86.
  2. Aune KS, Comstock J (1991) Experience and expression of jealousy: Comparison between friends and romantics. Psychol Rep, 69: 315-319.
  3. Basow SA (1992) Gender: Stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Bem SL (1974) The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol, 42: 155-162.
  4. Bem SL (1983) Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender aschematic society. Signs, 8; 598- 616. Brehm SS (1992) Intimate relationships. NY:McGraw Hill. Bridges JS (1981) Sex-typed may be beautiful but androgynous is good. Psychol Rep, 48: 262-272.
  5. Bringle RG (1991) Psychological aspects of jealousy: A transactional model. P. Salovey (Ed.) Psychology of jealousy and envy içinde (s. 103-131). New York: Guilford. Bringle RG (1995) Sexual jealousy in the relationships of homosexual and heterosexual men: 1980 and 1992. Pers Relatsh, 2: 313-325.
  6. Bringle RG, Buunk B (1985) Jealousy ans social behaviour: A review of person, relationship, and situational determinants. P. Shaver (Ed) Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 6 (s. 241-264).
  7. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Bringle RG, Roach S, Andler C ve ark. (1979) Measuring the intensity of jealousy reactions. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 9: 23-24.
  8. Bringle RG, Williams LJ (1979) Parental off-spring similarity on jealousy and related personality dimensions. Motivation and Emotion, 3: 265-286.
  9. Bryson JB (1991) Modes of response to jealousy-evoking situations. P. Salovey (Ed), The psychology of jealousy and envy içinde (s. 178-205) NY: Guilford Press.
  10. Buunk B (1981) Jealousy in sexually open marriages. Alternative Lifestyles, 4: 357-372.
  11. Buunk B (1982) Anticipated sexual jealousy: Its relationship to self-esteem, dependency and reciprocity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 8: 310-316.
  12. Buunk B, Bringle RG (1987) Jealousy in love relationships. D. Perlman ve S. Duck (Ed), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration içinde, s. 123-147.
  13. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Buunk BP, Angleitner A, Oubaid V ve ark. (1996) Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7: 359-379.
  14. Büyükşahin A, Hovardaoğlu S (2004) Çiftlerin aşka ilişkin tutumlarının Lee’nin çok boyutlu aşk biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergi