Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 58 Sayı: 1

CONTEXT REPETITION DOES NOT CHANGE THE SEQUENTIAL CONGRUENCY EFFECT WHEN THERE IS A STIMULUS-RESPONSE CONTINGENCY

UYARICI-TEPKİ İZLERLİĞİ BULUNDUĞUNDA BAĞLAM TEKRARI SIRALI UYUMLULUK ETKİSİNİ DEĞİŞTİRMEZ

Pages
955–972
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that even though contingency is manipulated in a different set, it is enough to eliminate the effect of context repetition on the SCE.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The sequential congruency effect SCE is defined as the decrease in the congruency effect following incongruent trials compared to congruent trials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Context was manipulated in Experiment 1 by using upper-case and lower-case letters, and in Experiment 2 by using regular and italic font.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that even though contingency is manipulated in a different set, it is enough to eliminate the effect of context repetition on the SCE.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dikkat · Bilişsel Kontrol · Stroop Görevi

Abstract

The sequential congruency effect SCE is defined as the decrease in the congruency effect following incongruent trials compared to congruent trials. The effect of context repetition on SCE was investigated with two experiments. In both experiments, a four-color Stroop task was used, and stimuli were divided into two sets. For the first set of items, there was not a contingency between the stimulus and the context; however, for the second set there was a contingency between the stimulus and the context. Context was manipulated in Experiment 1 by using upper-case and lower-case letters, and in Experiment 2 by using regular and italic font. In Experiment 1, a significant SCE was observed with the non-contingent set, however there was no effect of context change on the SCE. In brief, the SCE was observed both when the context changed or when it remained the same. In other words, even if the contingency was in a different set the second set , the fact that contingency existed in the experiment was enough to eliminate the effect of context-change on the SCE. In Experiment 2, the contingency manipulation was strengthened for the set that contained contingency and results were replicated for the first set, which did not contain contingency. The results showed that even though contingency is manipulated in a different set, it is enough to eliminate the effect of context repetition on the SCE. These results, support the notion that event representations, which contain stimulus, response and context information and most probably control parameters, are used dynamically.

Özet

Sıralı Uyumluluk Etkisi SUE uyumlu denemelere kıyasla, uyumsuz denemeleri izleyen uyumluluk etkisinin daha düşük olması olarak tanımlanır. Bağlam tekrarının SUE üzerindeki etkisi iki deneyde incelenmiştir. İki deneyde de dört renkli Stroop görevi kullanılmıştır. Uyarıcılar iki kümeye ayrılmıştır. Birinci kümedeki uyarıcılar için uyarıcı ve bağlam arasında bir izlerlik yoktur. İkinci kümedeki uyarıcılar için ise bu türden bir izlerlik vardır. Bağlamsal özellik olarak, birinci deneyde büyük ve küçük harf, ikinci deneyde ise düz ve italik yazıtipi kullanılmıştır. Deney 1’de izlerliğin olmadığı kümedeki uyarıcılar için SUE gözlemlenmiş fakat bağlam değişiminin SUE üzerinde etkisi gözlemlenmemiştir. Kısaca, SUE hem bağlam tekrarı hem de bağlam değişimi koşullarında gözlemlenmiştir. Diğer bir deyişle, izlerlik farklı bir kümede ikinci kümede de olsa deney içinde izlerliğin bulunması bağlam değişiminin SUE üzerindeki etkisini kaldırmıştır. Deney 2’de ise izlerliğin bulunduğu küme için izlerlik daha güçlü hale getirilmiş ve birinci kümedeki uyarıcılar için sonuçlar tekrarlanmıştır. Bulgular, izlerlik bilgisi başka bir kümede dahi olsa, bağlam tekrarının SUE üzerindeki etkisinin ortadan kalktığını göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, uyarıcı, tepki ve bağlam bilgisini ve büyük olasılıkla kontrol parametrelerini de birleştiren olay temsillerinin, dinamik olarak kullanıldığını desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAN, A. B., ATALAY, N. B., MISIRLISOY, M. (2018). CONTEXT REPETITION DOES NOT CHANGE THE SEQUENTIAL CONGRUENCY EFFECT WHEN THERE IS A STIMULUS-RESPONSE CONTINGENCY. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 58 Sayı: 1, 955–972. https://ajindex.com/articles/919470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akçay, Çağlar ve Eliot Hazeltine. "Conflict adaptation depends on task structure." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance 34.4 (2008): 958. Akçay, Çağlar ve Eliot Hazeltine. "Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations." Psychonomic bulletin & review 14.4 (2007): 742-748.
  2. Atalay, Nart Bedin ve Mine Mısırlısoy. "ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: a time course analysis." Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014): 1410. Atalay, Nart Bedin ve Aslı Bahar İnan. "Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency." Psychological research 81.2 (2017): 490-507.
  3. Botvinick, Matthew M. ve diğerleri. "Conflict monitoring and cognitive control." Psychological review 108.3 (2001): 624. Braem, Senne ve diğerleri. "What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis." Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014): 1134. Bugg, Julie M. "Conflict-triggered top-down control: Default mode, last resort, or no such thing?." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40.2 (2014): 567. Crump, Matthew JC ve Bruce Milliken. "Short article: The flexibility of context- specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62.8 (2009): 1523-1532.
  4. Crump, Matthew JC, Joaquín MM Vaquero ve Bruce Milliken. "Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience." Consciousness and cognition 17.1 (2008): 22-36.
  5. Crump, Matthew JC, Zhiyu Gong ve Bruce Milliken. "The context-specific proportion cue." Psychonomic bulletin & review 13.2 (2006): 316-321. Stroop effect: Location as a contextual Duthoo, Wout ve diğerleri. "The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation." PloS one 9.10 (2014): e110462. --. "The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update." Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014): 1001. Egner, Tobias. "Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects." Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014): 1247. --. "Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control." Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7.4 (2007): 380-390.
  6. Eriksen, Barbara A. ve Charles W. Eriksen. "Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task