Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 59 Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROMANTIC ATTACHMENT AND COPARENTING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS

ANNE VE BABALARIN ORTAK EBEVEYNLİK DAVRANIŞ VE ALGILARININ ROMANTİK BAĞLANMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
717–741
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that both observed and perceived coparenting were inversely related with both of the attachment dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Coparenting is defined as mothers and fathers sharing child rearing responsibilities, providing mutual support, and managing within-family dynamics together McHale, “Coparenting and Triadic…” 985 .
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty-five families who have three-month-old infants M = 103.78 days old participated in the study with their babies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that both observed and perceived coparenting were inversely related with both of the attachment dimensions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ortak Ebeveynlik · Bağlanma Kaygısı · Bağlanma Kaçınması

Abstract

Coparenting is defined as mothers and fathers sharing child rearing responsibilities, providing mutual support, and managing within-family dynamics together McHale, “Coparenting and Triadic…” 985 . The relationship of observed and perceived coparenting with romantic attachment, as measured with attachment anxiety and avoidance, was investigated in the current study. Forty-five families who have three-month-old infants M = 103.78 days old participated in the study with their babies. The Lausanne Trilogue Play Paradigm Fivaz-Depeursing and Corboz-Warnery 1 was employed in home visits, the parents were asked to engage in 10-minute semi-structured interactions with their babies and these interactions were video recorded. Recorded coparenting behaviors were evaluated by the researchers via “Coparenting and Family Rating System” McHale et al., “The Transition to Coparenthood…” 711 . Perceived coparenting and romantic attachment were measured via Parenting Alliance Inventory Abidin and Brunner 31 and Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire–Revised Fraley, Waller, and Brennan 350 scales, respectively. Results indicated that both observed and perceived coparenting were inversely related with both of the attachment dimensions. It was observed that as attachment anxiety and avoidance increase, mothers and fathers interact with each other less cooperatively in the presence of the babies. For both mothers and fathers, perceived coparenting was found to be related to attachment avoidance but not anxiety , this finding has lent support to previous research showing attachment anxiety may be relatively more functional in the relational Turkish culture.

Özet

Ortak ebeveynlik, anne ve babaların çocuk yetiştirmeyle ilgili sorumlulukları paylaşmaları, birbirlerini desteklemeleri ve aile içindeki dinamikleri birlikte yönetmeleri olarak tanımlanır McHale, “Coparenting and Triadic…” 985 . Mevcut çalışmada, gözlemlenen ve algılanan ortak ebeveynliğin, bağlanma kaygısı ve bağlanma kaçınması olarak iki boyutta ölçülen romantik bağlanma ile ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışmaya üç aylık bebek Ort. = 103.78 günlük sahibi 45 anne-baba bebekleriyle birlikte katılmıştır. Ev ziyaretleri yapılarak ve Lozan Üçlü Oyun Paradigması Fivaz-Depeursing ve Corboz- Warnery 1 kullanılarak, anne-babalardan bebekleriyle 10'ar dakikalık yarıyapılandırılmış etkileşimlerde bulunmaları istenmiş ve etkileşimler videoya kaydedilmiştir. Kaydedilen ortak ebeveynlik davranışları, “Ortak Ebeveynlik ve Aile Değerlendirme Sistemi” McHale ve diğerleri, “The Transition to Coparenthood…” 711 kullanılarak araştırmacılar tarafından kodlanmıştır. Algılanan ortak ebeveynlik ve romantik bağlanma değişkenleri, sırasıyla “Ebeveynlik İşbirliği Ölçeği” Abidin ve Brunner 31 ve “Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II” Fraley, Waller ve Brennan 350 ölçekleri ile öz bildirim yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, hem gözlemlenen hem de algılanan olumlu ortak ebeveynliğin, romantik bağlanma boyutları ile olumsuz yönde ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Bağlanma kaygısı ve kaçınması yükseldikçe anne ve babaların bebekleriyle birlikte etkileşimde bulunurken daha az işbirliği gösterdikleri gözlemlenmiştir. Algılanan ortak ebeveynlik ise, hem anneler hem de babalar için sadece bağlanma kaçınması ile kaygısı ile değil ilişkili bulunmuş, bu bulgu da ilişkisel Türkiye kültüründe bağlanma kaygısının görece daha işlevsel olduğunu gösteren diğer çalışmaları desteklemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ENGİN, S. S., SÜMER, N., ÇETİNER, E. S., SAKMAN, E. (2019). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROMANTIC ATTACHMENT AND COPARENTING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59 Sayı: 1, 717–741. https://ajindex.com/articles/919419

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abidin, Richard R. ve Jack F. Brunner. “Development of a Parenting Alliance Inventory.” Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 24.1 (1995): 31-40.
  2. Bandalos, Deborah L. “The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling.” Structural Equation Modeling 9.1 (2002): 78-102.
  3. Belsky, Jay, Sam Putnam ve Keith Crnic. “Coparenting, Parenting, and Early Emotional Development.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 74 (1996): 45-55.
  4. Bowlby, John. Attachment and loss: Vol.1, Attachment (2. baskı). New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, (Orijinal baskı 1969), 1982.
  5. Caldera, Yvonne M. ve Eric W. Lindsey. “Coparenting, Mother-Infant Interaction, and Infant-Parent Attachment Relationships in Two-Parent Families.” Journal of Family Psychology 20.2 (2006): 275-283.
  6. Chisholm, James S. ve diğerleri. “Early Stress Predicts Age at Menarche and First Birth, Adult Attachment, and Expected Lifespan.” Human Nature 16.3 (2005): 233-265.
  7. Collins, Nancy L. ve Máire B. Ford. “Responding to the Needs of Others: The Caregiving Behavioral System in Intimate Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27.2 (2010): 235-244.
  8. Coyl, Diana D., Lisa A. Newland ve Harry Freeman. “Predicting Preschoolers’ Attachment Security from Parenting Behaviours, Parents’ Attachment Relationships and Their Use of Social Support.” Early Child Development and Care 180.4 (2010): 499-512.
  9. Doss, Brian D. ve diğerleri. “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Coparenting and Relationship Interventions During the Transition to Parenthood.” Journal of Family Psychology 28.4 (2014): 483-498.
  10. Faul, Franz ve diğerleri. “G* Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39.2 (2007): 175-191.
  11. Favez, Nicolas, Hervé Tissot ve France Frascarolo. “Is It Typical? The Ecological Validity of the Observation of Mother-Father-Infant Interactions in the Lausanne Trilogue Play.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 16.1 (2019): 113-121.
  12. Feeney, Judith A. “Parental Attachment and Conflict Behavior: Implications for Offspring's Attachment, Loneliness, and Relationship Satisfaction.” Personal Relationships 13.1 (2006): 19-36.
  13. Feeney, Judith ve diğerleri. “Attachment Insecurity, Depression, and the Transition to Parenthood.” Personal Relationships 10.4 (2003): 475-493.
  14. Feinberg, Mark E., Marni L. Kan ve E. Mavis Hetherington. “The Longitudinal Influence of