Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Institutional Works During the Institutional Resistance Process: TTB and Full-time Working Act

Kurumsal Direniş Sürecinde Yapılan Kurumsal İşler: TTB ve Tam Gün Yasası Örneği

Pages
226–244
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this study concludes that several institutional works under the titles of valourizing and demonizing, establishing institutional networks and cooperation were conducted to maintain existing institutional arrangements by the Turkish Medical Association, which was given the privilege by its founding act.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Institutional resistance refers to actors’ attempts that aim to limit institutional control or agency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It requires the maintenance of institutions and in this respect realizing some strategic institutional works.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this study concludes that several institutional works under the titles of valourizing and demonizing, establishing institutional networks and cooperation were conducted to maintain existing institutional arrangements by the Turkish Medical Association, which was given the privilege by its founding act.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eyleyenlik · Kurumsal direniş · Kurumsal iş

Abstract

Institutional resistance refers to actors’ attempts that aim to limit institutional control or agency. It requires the maintenance of institutions and in this respect realizing some strategic institutional works. This study uses qualitative research methods and investigates institutional works for institutional resistance in the case of the Turkish Medical Association and the act known as the Full-time Working Act Within the scope of the research, primary data were obtained by conducting in-depth interviews with ten people using semi-structured questions. In addition, archival research was conducted in order to obtain secondary data such as research and sector reports, organizational correspondence, legal regulations, and media news. To get the findings, the data were clearly classified through “line by line coding” used in qualitative analysis. Thus, this study concludes that several institutional works under the titles of valourizing and demonizing, establishing institutional networks and cooperation were conducted to maintain existing institutional arrangements by the Turkish Medical Association, which was given the privilege by its founding act.

Özet

Kurumsal kontrol veya eyleyenliği kısıtlamaya dönük aktör girişimlerini ifade eden kurumsal direniş, bir yönüyle kurumların sürdürülmesini ve nihayet bu anlamda stratejik olarak bir takım kurumsal işlerin gerçekleştirilmesini gerektirir. Mevcut çalışma, bir yandan kurumsal kontrol altındaki aktörlerin eyleyenleşmesine odaklanmış, diğer yandan da bu aktörlerin, kurumsal baskılar karşısında mevcut kurumsal düzenlemelerin sürdürülmesi adına direnirken gerçekleştirdikleri kurumsal işleri belirlemeyi amaç edinmiştir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemleri kullanılarak kurumsal direniş açısından gerçekleştirilen kurumsal işler, Tam Gün Yasası olarak bilinen yasal düzenleme ve Türk Tabipleri Birliği örnekliğinde çalışılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında on kişi ile yarı yapılandırılmış sorularla derinlemesine mülakatlar yapılarak birincil veriler elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca araştırma ve sektör raporları, kurumsal yazışmalar, yasal düzenlemeler, medya haberleri gibi ikincil verilerin elde edilmesi amacıyla açık kaynaklardan arşiv araştırması yapılarak veri toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler, nitel analizde kullanılan “satır satır kodlama” yoluyla açık olarak tasnif edilerek bulgular elde edilmiştir. Böylece mevcut kurumsal düzenin sürdürülmesi noktasında, yüceltme ve kötülemenin yanı sıra, kurumsal ağ(lar) oluşturma ve işbirliği başlıkları altında bir takım kurumsal işlerin kuruluş yasası tarafından ayrıcalıklandırılmış bir aktör olan TTB tarafından gerçekleştirildiği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAY, A., KOÇ, O. (2022). Institutional Works During the Institutional Resistance Process: TTB and Full-time Working Act. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 226–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/869556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akdağ, R. (2011a). (Der.) Türkiye Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı Değerlendirme Raporu (2003-2010), Yayın No. 839, Ankara:
  2. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Akdağ, R. (2011b). “Akdağ: Tam Gün Yasası'ndan sonra kamudaki hekim sayısı azalmadı, arttı”, http://www.memurlar.net/haber/178896/ (18.04.2014)
  3. Aldrich, E. H. (2010). Beam me up Scott(ie)! Institutional Theorists’ Struggles with the Emergent Nature of Entrepreneurship. Research in the Sociology of Work, 21, 329-364.
  4. Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals' Social Position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.
  5. Battilana, J., Leca B. & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107.
  6. Battilana, J. & D’ Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency, Edt: Thomas B. Lawrence, Roy Suddaby ve Bernard Leca, Institutional Work, Cambridge University Press,
  7. Cambridge. Bigelow, B. & Middleton Stone, M. (1995). Why Don't They Do What We Want? An Exploration of Organizational Responses to Institutional Pressures in Community Health Centers. Public Administration Review, 55 (2), 183-192.
  8. Brint, S. & Karabel, J. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: the case of american community colleges. s. 337-60 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio. University of Chicago Press.
  9. Chia, R.C. H & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy Without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Clemens, E.S. & Cook, J.M. (1999). Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466.
  11. Clemens, W.B. & Douglas, J.T. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1205– 1213. Currie, G. Lockett, A. Finn, R. Martin, G. & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–962.
  12. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  13. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. L. G. Zucker (Der.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment içinde, s. 3-21,
  14. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizatio