SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

İÇSEL PAZARLAMA İLE KURUMSAL İTİBAR ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Gül Banu DAYANÇ KIYAT
Coşkun KAYA
Pages
54–87
Publication Date
2022-04-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is the first study which established and revealed the relationship between internal marketing and the corporate reputation in the sector of education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to identify the relationship between internal marketting and corporate reputation through a concise research on employees of state and private universities in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data colected from 501 participants through interviews on voluntary basis have been analyzed through SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 20.0 programs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is the first study which established and revealed the relationship between internal marketing and the corporate reputation in the sector of education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Internal marketing · corporate reputation · employee at universities

Özet

This article aims to identify the relationship between internal marketting and corporate reputation through a concise research on employees of state and private universities in Turkey. The data colected from 501 participants through interviews on voluntary basis have been analyzed through SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 20.0 programs. In this study, the convenience sampling method has been adopted and applied and four main hypotheses have been tested to complete the essential research criteria procedures and steps such as validity, reliability, descriptive, relational, interactional and difference analysis. The analysis elaborated internal marketing and corporate reputation under a single dimension and demonstrated that the related dimensions were perceived as a holistic concept by the higher education sector. The hypothesis tests which intended to determine variance (the change) in internal marketting perception and the effect of this variance on corporate reputation and this researched revealed that the increase in the perception of internal marketting leads to a boost in the perception of corporate reputation. Furthermore, the study showed that internal marketring and corporate reputation perceptions of private university employees are more robust than those of state universities. This is the first study which established and revealed the relationship between internal marketing and the corporate reputation in the sector of education.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIYAT, G. B. D., KAYA, C. (2022). İÇSEL PAZARLAMA İLE KURUMSAL İTİBAR ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 54–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/847019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acuner, Ş.A. (2014). Rekabet avantajı kazanmada anahtar kavram: kurumsal itibar. Kalkınmada Anahtar Verimlilik Dergisi, Ekim, 310:16-21.
  2. Ahmed, P.K. and Rafiq, M. (2000). Advances in the internal marketing concept: definition, synthesis and extension. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(6): 449-462.
  3. Akroush, M.N., ElSamen, A.A., Samawi, G.A.and Odetallah, A.L. (2013). Internal marketing and service quality in restaurants. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(4):304-336.
  4. Almeida M. da G. C.and Coelho A. M. (2017). The impact of corporate reputation in a dairy company. Business and Economics Journal. 8(4), 1-11. DOI: 10.4172/2151-6219.1000320. Alsop, R. J. (2004). Corporate reputation: anything but superficial the deep but fragile nature of corporatereputation. The Journal of Business Strategy, 25(6), 21-29.
  5. Avcı, K. (2018). Üniversite iç paydaşlarının kurumsal itibar algısı: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi kurumsal itibar araştırması. Selçuk İletişim, 12 (1):42-63.
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resourc eand sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Managemet, 17(1), 99-120.
  7. Basualdo, E.M. (2010). The effects of internal marketing on six sigma perception. Arizona: University of Phoenix. Berry, L.L. (1981). The employee as customer. Journal of RetailBanking. 3(1), 8-25.
  8. Berry, L.L.,Hensel, J.S. and Burke, M.C. (1976). Improving retaile rcapability for effective consumerism response. Journal of Retailig, 52(3), 3–14.
  9. Boyd, B. K.,Bergh, D. D. and Ketchen, D. J. (2009). Reconsidering the reputation-performance relationship: a resource based view. Journal of Management. 36(3), 588-609.
  10. Boukis, A., Kaminakis, K., Siampos, A. and Kostopoulos, I. (2015) Linking internal marketing with customer outcomes. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 33(3): 394- 413. Budd, J. F. (1994). How to manage corporate reputations. Public Relations Quarterly. 39(4), 11–13.
  11. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara:
  12. Pegem Akademi Publishers.
  13. Chun, Rosa. (2005). Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews. 7(2), 91 - 109. Collins COBUILD English dictionary for advanced learners (2001). (3rd ed.). Harper Collins Publishers, 1314. Dayanç Kıyat, G.B. (2017). The relationship between reputation quotient and perceived quality of brands in Turkey’s mobile communication sector. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. (53), 31-64. DOI: 10.17064/iuifd.372587 DeCenzo D., and Robbins, S. (2005). Fundamen