Journals / International e-Journal of Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12

An Investigation of Middle School Students’ Views on the Contributions of Dioramas to Biodiversity Education

Pages
136–147
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, including and using dioramas in learning environments for biodiversity education can mediate learning as well as help students to benefit from a realistic environment that include living things, the ecosystems they form and the places they live in.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dioramas are seen as unique teaching tools for environmental education in general and biodiversity education in particular as they present realistic learning environments that can reflect the components of the biodiversity, relationships among these components and changes occur over time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the research consists of twenty-four 7th grade students studying during the 2021-2022 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, including and using dioramas in learning environments for biodiversity education can mediate learning as well as help students to benefit from a realistic environment that include living things, the ecosystems they form and the places they live in.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2021-2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Environmental education · biodiversity · middle school science

Abstract

Dioramas are seen as unique teaching tools for environmental education in general and biodiversity education in particular as they present realistic learning environments that can reflect the components of the biodiversity, relationships among these components and changes occur over time. The aim of this study is to examine middle school students' views on diorama supported biodiversity education. A phenomenological approach based on student experiences were employed for the study. The study group of the research consists of twenty-four 7th grade students studying during the 2021-2022 academic year. Students participated in an 8 hours experimental process included diorama supported 5E constructivist teaching model. Interviews were used as the data collection tool. The analysis of data revealed that dioramas contribute positively to biodiversity education as they enhance learning, mitigate the effects of misconceptions, increase students’ awareness to protect biodiversity and of biodiversity sustainability. Therefore, including and using dioramas in learning environments for biodiversity education can mediate learning as well as help students to benefit from a realistic environment that include living things, the ecosystems they form and the places they live in.

Özet

Dioramas are seen as unique teaching tools for environmental education in general and biodiversity education in particular as they present realistic learning environments that can reflect the components of the biodiversity, relationships among these components and changes occur over time. The aim of this study is to examine middle school students' views on diorama supported biodiversity education. A phenomenological approach based on student experiences were employed for the study. The study group of the research consists of twenty-four 7th grade students studying during the 2021-2022 academic year. Students participated in an 8 hours experimental process included diorama supported 5E constructivist teaching model. Interviews were used as the data collection tool. The analysis of data revealed that dioramas contribute positively to biodiversity education as they enhance learning, mitigate the effects of misconceptions, increase students’ awareness to protect biodiversity and of biodiversity sustainability. Therefore, including and using dioramas in learning environments for biodiversity education can mediate learning as well as help students to benefit from a realistic environment that include living things, the ecosystems they form and the places they live in.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFE, H. A., TUSUN, S., ALAKUŞ, A. O., EFE, R. (2022). An Investigation of Middle School Students’ Views on the Contributions of Dioramas to Biodiversity Education. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12, 136–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/764844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 138-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10069.
  2. Assa, J. & Wolf, L. (2007). Diorama construction from a single image, Computer Graphics Forum, 26(3), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01083.x.
  3. Beiersdorfer, R. E.& Davis,W E. (1994). Suggestions for planning a class field trip. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 307-311.
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). Global biodiversity outlook 2. Retrieved Janruary 3, 2022, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/gbo/gbo2/cbd-gbo2-en.pdf.
  5. Dikmenli, M. (2010). Biology student teachers’ conceptual frameworks regarding biodiversity. Education, 19, 479-489.
  6. Gayford, C. (2000). Biodiversity education: a teacher’s perspective. Environmental Education Research, 6, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/713664696.
  7. Hycner, R.H.(1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279-303.
  8. IUCN (2020). IUCN Red List 2017–2020 Report. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://5wf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IUCN_RED_LIST_QUADRENNIAL_REPORT_2017-2020.pdf.
  9. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Sage. Kaşıkçı, D.N., Çağıltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E.& Ogan, C. (2014). Internet habits and safe internet use of children in Turkey and Europe. Education and Science, 39, 230-243.
  10. Kassas, M. (2002). Environmental education: biodiversity. The Environmentalist, 22, 345–351. https://doi:10.1023/A:1020766914456.
  11. Leakey, R.E.& Lewin, R. (1996). The sixth extinction: Biodiversity and its survival. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Lindemann-Matthies, P. & Bose, E. (2008). How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology, 36, 731-742.
  12. Marandino, M., Dias Oliveira, A. & Mortensen, M.F. (2009). Discussing biodiversity in dioramas: A powerful tool to museum education. ICOM Natural History Committee Newsletter, 29, 30-36.
  13. Mayer, J. (1996). Education and communication for biodiversity: Key concepts, strategies and case studies: Using the Delphi-technique to identify and prioritize concepts for biodiversity education. (D. Elcome, Ed). IUCN. Meffe, G. & Carroll, R. (1997). Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates. Menzel, S. & Bögeholz, S. (2006). Vorstellungen und argumentationsstrukturen von schüler(inne)n der elften jahrgangstufe zur