Journals / International e-Journal of Educational Studies / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 15

How do Mentor Teachers Implement Mathematical Tasks?: The Perspective of Preservice Mathematics Teachers

Pages
844–858
Publication Date
2023-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that only one teacher selected most of the tasks at a high level and maintained them without declining their cognitive demand.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate mentor teachers’ task implementation and instructional dispositions from the perspective of preservice mathematics teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He discussed student-invented strategies and sometimes focused on multiple solutions and misconceptions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that only one teacher selected most of the tasks at a high level and maintained them without declining their cognitive demand.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cognitive demand · instructional dispositions · mathematical task

Abstract

This study aims to investigate mentor teachers’ task implementation and instructional dispositions from the perspective of preservice mathematics teachers. Twelve preservice mathematics teachers examined four mentor teachers' task selection and implementation in terms of cognitive demand and instructional dispositions that affect their cognitive demand. The data were gathered from detailed observation notes and focus group interviews of preservice teachers. The results indicated that only one teacher selected most of the tasks at a high level and maintained them without declining their cognitive demand. His instructional dispositions showed us that he displayed an approach that allowed students to explore the tasks, reason, and discuss ideas. Launching fewer problems per lesson, he enabled students to examine the tasks in depth. He discussed student-invented strategies and sometimes focused on multiple solutions and misconceptions. Instead of algorithmic solutions, he emphasized underlying concepts, multiple representations, and daily life situations. On the other hand, other teachers mostly implemented tasks at low-level, however, they had different instructional dispositions towards student explorations, classroom discussions, and utilizing multiple representations. Based on these results, this study highlights the importance of mentor teachers for the professional development of preservice teachers.

Özet

This study aims to investigate mentor teachers’ task implementation and instructional dispositions from the perspective of preservice mathematics teachers. Twelve preservice mathematics teachers examined four mentor teachers' task selection and implementation in terms of cognitive demand and instructional dispositions that affect their cognitive demand. The data were gathered from detailed observation notes and focus group interviews of preservice teachers. The results indicated that only one teacher selected most of the tasks at a high level and maintained them without declining their cognitive demand. His instructional dispositions showed us that he displayed an approach that allowed students to explore the tasks, reason, and discuss ideas. Launching fewer problems per lesson, he enabled students to examine the tasks in depth. He discussed student-invented strategies and sometimes focused on multiple solutions and misconceptions. Instead of algorithmic solutions, he emphasized underlying concepts, multiple representations, and daily life situations. On the other hand, other teachers mostly implemented tasks at low-level, however, they had different instructional dispositions towards student explorations, classroom discussions, and utilizing multiple representations. Based on these results, this study highlights the importance of mentor teachers for the professional development of preservice teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞDAT, O. (2023). How do Mentor Teachers Implement Mathematical Tasks?: The Perspective of Preservice Mathematics Teachers. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 15, 844–858. https://ajindex.com/articles/968989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ader, E. (2020). Investigating elementary school teachers’ development of mathematical task implementation quality. Education and Science, 45(202), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8544
  2. Arbaugh, F., & Brown, C. A. (2006). Analyzing mathematical tasks: A catalyst for change? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(6), 499-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-6585-3
  3. Boston, M. D. (2013). Connecting changes in secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge to their experiences in a professional development workshop. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 7-31.
  4. Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers' classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 119-156.
  5. Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2011). A ‘task-centric approach’ to professional development: Enhancing and sustaining mathematics teachers’ ability to implement cognitively challenging mathematical tasks. ZDM, 43(6-7), 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0353-2
  6. Butler, B. M., & Cuenca, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the roles of mentor teachers during student teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 296-308.
  7. Guner, P., & Akyuz, D. (2020). Noticing student mathematical thinking within the context of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 568-583.
  8. Güzel, M., Bozkurt, A. & Özmantar, M. F. (2021). Analysis of the evaluations and interventions made by mathematics teachers in the activity design and implementation process. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9 (18), 513-545. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.880304
  9. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690
  10. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393-425.
  11. Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2019). Challenges of maintaining cognitive demand during the limit lessons: Understanding one mathematician’s class practices. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 856-882.
  12. Hudson, P. (2012). How can schools support beginning teachers? A call for a timely induction and mentoring for effective teaching. Australia