SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Next Generation Breeding in Potato

Mehmet Emin CALISKAN
Pages
1–33
Publication Date
2017-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The genomic insurgency from the recent past has significantly enhanced the overall knowhow of the genetic structure of all the crops.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Potato is the world's number one non-grain commodity and ranks at fourth position after maize, rice and wheat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The genomic insurgency from the recent past has significantly enhanced the overall knowhow of the genetic structure of all the crops.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review demonstrates how next generation phenotyping, genome-wide association studies and genome editing tools can be used to modify tools to genomics for the need of potato breeders to transform potato improvement.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Next generation phenotyping · Genomewide association studies · genome editing

Abstract

Potato is the world's number one non-grain commodity and ranks at fourth position after maize, rice and wheat. As a species, potato is very docile to cell culture, it also contains an extended history of applications in the field of biotechnology for the improvement of crops. The genomic insurgency from the recent past has significantly enhanced the overall knowhow of the genetic structure of all the crops. Crop genome sequences has totally reformed our view and understanding for genome association and genome development. Increased knowledge in markers along with the advanced phenotyping, genotyping by sequencing, genomewide association studies added a new way for determining marker-trait associations that can withstand genome based breeding programs. Accessibility of sequencing of genomic data has permitted editing of genome (localized mutagenesis), for obtaining sequences of gene that is anticipated by the breeders. To develop some genetic maps, markers application and genomics in the field of potato breeding these genetic characteristics have also assigned the tasks to the breeders. Many strategies are formulated to describe the potato loci, (contender) genes and alleles, and association of genotype with the phenotype are also stated. This review demonstrates how next generation phenotyping, genome-wide association studies and genome editing tools can be used to modify tools to genomics for the need of potato breeders to transform potato improvement.

🔖

Cite This Article

CALISKAN, M. E. (2017). Next Generation Breeding in Potato. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 1–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/753186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agrama HA and Eizenga GC (2008). “Molecular diversity and genome-wide linkage disequilibrium patterns in a worldwide collection of Oryza sativa and its wild relatives,” Euphytica, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 339-355.
  2. Agrama HA, Eizenga GC, and Yan W (2007). “Association mapping of yield and its components in rice cultivars,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 341-356.
  3. Andersen JR, SchragT, Melchinger AE, Zein I, and Lubberstedt T (2005). “Validation of Dwarf8 polymorphisms associated with flowering time in elite European inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.),” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol.111, no. 2, pp. 206-217.
  4. Andersen JR, Zein I and Wenzel G (2007). “High levels of linkage disequilibrium and associations with forage qualityat a Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase locus in European maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol.114, no. 2, pp. 307-319.
  5. Andersson M, Turesson H, Nicolia A, Fält AS, Samuelsson M and Hofvander P (2016). Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports, 1-12.
  6. Anithakumari AM, Dolstra O, Vosman B, Visser RGF, and Van der Linden CG (2011). In vitro screening and QTL analysis for drought tolerance in diploid potato. Euphytica, 181(3):357-369.
  7. Araki M and Ishii T (2015). Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends in plant science, 20(3): 145-149.
  8. Aranzana MJ, Kim S, Zhao K, Bakker E, Horton M, Jakob K, Lister C, Molitor J, Shindo C, Tang C, Toomajian C, Traw B, Zheng H, Bergelson J, Dean C, Marjoram P and Nordborg M (2005). Genome-wide association mapping in Arabidopsis identifies previously known flowering time and pathogen resistance genes. PLOS Genetics, 1: e60. Araus JL and Cairns JE (2014). Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science, 19(1):52-61. Backhaus A,Kuwabara A, Bauch M, Monk N, Sanguinetti G and Fleming A (2010). LEAFPROCESSOR: a new leaf phenotyping tool using contour bending energy and shape cluster analysis. New Phytol 187:251-261.
  9. Baker NR (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59: 89-113.
  10. Bakker E, Borm T, Prins P, van der Vossen E, Uenk G, Arens M (2011). A genome-wide genetic map of NB-LRR disease resistance loci in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123:493-508. doi:10.1007/ s00122-011-1602-z. Barabaschi D, Tondelli A, Desiderio F, Volante A,Vaccino P, Valè G and Cat