SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Agronomic Characteristics and Cold Tolerance of Some Wheat Genotypes Under Different Ecological Locations

Berrin Dumlu(Eastern Anatolia Agricultural Research Institute)
Ümran Küçüközdemir(Eastern Anatolia Agricultural Research Institute)
Halit Karagöz(EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS)
Orçun Yilmaz(Aegean Agricultural Research Institute)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate a wide genetic variation for cold tolerance and quality traits among the tested materials, suggesting that genotypes such as Parla and Palandöken 97 could serve as valuable parents in breeding programs targeting cold tolerance and yield stability in harsh winter conditions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic characteristics and cold tolerance of 18 wheat genotypes (11 advanced lines and 7 standard cultivars) under different ecological conditions of Eastern Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Field experiments were conducted during the 2021-2022 growing season in four locations (Erzurum-Aziziye, Erzurum-Pasinler, Erzincan, and Muş) using a randomized complete block design with three replications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate a wide genetic variation for cold tolerance and quality traits among the tested materials, suggesting that genotypes such as Parla and Palandöken 97 could serve as valuable parents in breeding programs targeting cold tolerance and yield stability in harsh winter conditions
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021-2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Wheat · cold tolerance · grain yield

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic characteristics and cold tolerance of 18 wheat genotypes (11 advanced lines and 7 standard cultivars) under different ecological conditions of Eastern Anatolia. Field experiments were conducted during the 2021-2022 growing season in four locations (Erzurum-Aziziye, Erzurum-Pasinler, Erzincan, and Muş) using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Agronomic traits such as grain yield, protein content, thousand grain weight, and hectoliter weight were measured. Cold tolerance was tested under controlled conditions at -15, -17, and -19 °C. The results revealed significant (P< 0.01) genotypic differences for all parameters. The average survival rates were 67.07%, 54.74%, and 38.08% at -15, -17, and -19 °C, respectively, indicating a clear decline with decreasing temperature. Among the genotypes, Parla and genotype 10 displayed the highest cold tolerance, while Esperia and Palandöken 97 exhibited superior protein and hectoliter weights. Lines 1 and 5 are thought to be suitable candidates for registration due to their high yield and large grains. PCA separated the genotypes based on yield, quality, and cold response, showing that the traits are largely independent. These results indicate a wide genetic variation for cold tolerance and quality traits among the tested materials, suggesting that genotypes such as Parla and Palandöken 97 could serve as valuable parents in breeding programs targeting cold tolerance and yield stability in harsh winter conditions

🔖

Cite This Article

Dumlu, B., Küçüközdemir, Ü., Karagöz, H., Yilmaz, O. (2026). Agronomic Characteristics and Cold Tolerance of Some Wheat Genotypes Under Different Ecological Locations. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1477716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Demir, Y. (2000). Growth and proline content of germinating wheat genotypes under ultraviolet light. Turkish Journal of Botany, 24(1), 67-70.
  2. Dhillon, T., and Stockinger, E. J. (2013). Cbf14 copy number variation in the A, B, and D genomes of diploid and polyploid wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126(11), 2777-2789. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2171-0
  3. Ding, Y., Wang, W., Zhuang, Q., and Luo, Y. (2020). Adaptation of paddy rice in China to climate change: The effects of shifting sowing date on yield and irrigation water requirement. Agricultural Water Management, 228, Article 105890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agwat.2019.105890
  4. Dumlu, B., Tosun, M., Karagoz, H., Kucukozdemir, U., Bocianowski, J., Alipour, H., and Türkoglu, A. (2025). Assessment of genetic diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotype for cold tolerance, agronomic, and quality traits. Crop and Pasture Science, 76(6), Article CP25047. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP25047
  5. Evers, T., and Millar, S. (2002). Cereal grain structure and development: Some implications for quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 36(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0435
  6. Finlay, K. W., and Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(6), 742-754. https://doi.org/10.1071/ AR9630742
  7. Fowler, D.B. and Gusta L.V., 1979. Selection for winterhardiness in wheat. I Identification of genotypic variability. Crop Sci. 19: 769-772. https://doi.org/10.2135/ cropsci1979.0011183X001900060005x
  8. Han, R., Jian, C., Lv, J., Yan, Y., Chi, Q., Li, Z., Wang, Q., Zhang, J., Liu, X., and Zhao, H. (2014). Identification and characterization of microRNAs in the flag leaf and developing seed of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genomics, 15, Article 289. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164- 15-289
  9. Hernandez-Ochoa, I. M., Asseng, S., Kassie, B. T., Xiong, W., Robertson, R., Pequeno, D. N. L., Sonder, K., Reynolds, M., Babar, M. A., Milan, A. M., and Hoogenboom, G. (2018). Climate change impact on Mexico wheat production. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 263, 373-387. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.09.008
  10. Kara, K., Rached-Kanouni, M., Mezghani, N., Mnasri, S., and Ben Naceur, M. B. (2018). Molecular characterization of bread wheat genotypes Triticum aestivum L. through microsatellites SSR markers. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 18(6.2), 377- 384. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/6.2/ S25.050
  11. Knox, A. K., Dhillon, T., Cheng, H., Tondelli, A., Pecchioni, N., and Stockinger, E. J. (2010). CBF gene copy number variation at Frost Resistance-2 is associated with levels of freezing tolerance in temperate-climate cereals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121(1), 21-35. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00122-010-1288-7
  12. Kumar, A., Kapoor, P., Chunduri, V., Sharma, S., and Garg, M. (2019). Potential of Aegilops sp. for improvement of grain processing and nutritional quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 308. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2019.00308
  13. Kurt, M., and Dizlek, H. (2022). The effects of two-step tempering treatment on the physical, chemical and technological properties of flour in bread wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(1), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.18016/ ksutarimdoga.vi.878636
  14. Li, C., Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Song, Q., Zhang, R., and Gao, C. (2018). Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biology, 19, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1443-3
  15. Liu, B., Asseng, S., Müller, C., Ewert, F., Elliott, J., Lobell, D. B., Martre, P., Ruane, A. C., Wallach, D., Jones, J. W., Rosenzweig, C., Aggarwal, P. K., Alderman, P. D., Anothai, J., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Cammarano, D., Challinor, A., Deryng, D., … Zhu, Y. (2016). Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods. Nature Climate Change, 6(12), 1130-1136. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate3115
  16. Öztürk, A., Ekinci, S. A., Kodaz, S., and Aydın, M. (2021). Agronomic performance of the alternative cereal species in the highest plain of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(2), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.630466
  17. Peterson, C. J., Graybosch, R. A., Baenziger, P. S., and Grombacher, A. W. (1992). Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Science, 32(1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.2135/ cropsci1992.0011183X003200010022x
  18. Poudel, M. R., Ghimire, S., Pandey, M. P., Dhakal, K., Thapa, D. B., and Poudel, H. K. (2020). Yield stability analysis of wheat genotypes at irrigated, heat stress and drought condition. Journal of Biology and Today’s World, 9(5), Article 220.
  19. Sharma, N., Bhatia, S., Chunduri, V., Kaur, S., Sharma, S., Kapoor, P., Kumari, A., and Garg, M. (2020). Pathogenesis of celiac disease and other gluten related disorders in wheat and strategies for mitigating them. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00006
  20. Tadesse, W., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Assefa, S. G., Amri, A., Bishaw, Z., Ogbonnaya, F. C., and Baum, M. (2019). Genetic gains in wheat breeding and its role in feeding the world. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, 1, e190005. https://doi. org/10.20900/cbgg20190005
  21. Triboï, E., Martre, P., and Triboï‐Blondel, A.‐M. (2003). Environmentally‐induced changes in protein composition in developing grains of wheat are related to changes in total protein content. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(388), 1731- 1742. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg183
  22. Williams, R. M., O’Brien, L., Eagles, H. A., Solah, V. A., and Jayasena, V. (2008). The influences of genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interaction on wheat quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 59(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07185
  23. Yan, W., and Kang, M. S. (2002). GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press.
  24. Yilmaz, H., Karatas, R., Demirel, F., Soysal, S., Türkoğlu, A., Yilmaz, A., and Ciftci, V. (2024). Variations in protein, gluten, Zeleny sedimentation and yield of certain wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under different climatic conditions. Euphytica, 220(12), Article 190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03446-8