SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2013 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

COMPARISON OF ORGANIC AND TRADITIONAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mehmet ARSLAN
Mehmet Emin CALISKAN
Cahit ERDOGAN
Sevgi CALISKAN
Pages
34–39
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among the organic production systems, green manure and farmyard manure applications could be strongly recommended for organic chickpea producer since the highest seed yields with 2729 in 2007 and 3838 kg ha-1 in 2008 were found in green manure + farmyard manure treatment among the organic production systems

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Yield and yield components, and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were compared in traditional and organic production systems since organic farming has many advantages on environment, animal and human health over traditional production systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seed yield and some yield components were found higher in the traditional production system than those of organic production systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among the organic production systems, green manure and farmyard manure applications could be strongly recommended for organic chickpea producer since the highest seed yields with 2729 in 2007 and 3838 kg ha-1 in 2008 were found in green manure + farmyard manure treatment among the organic production systems
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Yield and yield components, and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were compared in traditional and organic production systems since organic farming has many advantages on environment, animal and human health over traditional production systems. In the study, organic production system, green manure, farmyard manure and effective microorganisms and their combinations were tested as six treatments. Seed yield and some yield components were found higher in the traditional production system than those of organic production systems. The highest protein content was obtained in green manure and farmyard manure applications. Among the organic production systems, green manure and farmyard manure applications could be strongly recommended for organic chickpea producer since the highest seed yields with 2729 in 2007 and 3838 kg ha-1 in 2008 were found in green manure + farmyard manure treatment among the organic production systems

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M., CALISKAN, M. E., ERDOGAN, C., CALISKAN, S. (2022). COMPARISON OF ORGANIC AND TRADITIONAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/605845

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous,2012a.http://organik.tarim.gov.tr/sayfam.asp?sid=4 1&pid=41&ld=Organik%20Tar%FDm%20%DCretim%20V erileri. Anonymous,2012b.http://organik.tarim.gov.tr/Kitaplar/ot_yonet melik/index.html#/2 A.O.A.C. (2005): Official Methods of Analysis 18th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington D. C. U.S.A Ashiono, G.B., J.P. Ouma and S.W. Gatwiku, 2006. Farmyard manure as alternative nutrient source in production of cold tolerant sorghum in the dry highlands of Kenya. J. of Agron. 5 (2): 201-204.
  2. Astier, M., J.M. Maass, J.D. Etchevers-Barra, J.J. Pena, F. Leon Gonzalez, 2006. Short-term green manure and tillage management effects on maize yield and soil quality in an Andisol. Soil and Tillage Res., 88: 153-159.
  3. Bettiol, W., R. Ghini, J.A.H. Galvão, R.C. Siloto, 2004. Organic and conventional tomato cropping systems. Sci. Agric., 61 (3): 253-259.
  4. Cagirgan, M.I., C. Toker, M. Karhan, M. Aksu, S. Ulger, H. Canci, 2011. Assessment of endogenous organic acid levels in ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.] susceptible and resistant chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish J. of Field Crops, 16, 121-124.
  5. Caliskan, S. 2007. Organic farming and organic field crops production in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, Mustafa Kemal Univ., 12(1-2): 37-46.
  6. Daly, M.J., D.P.C. Stewart, 1999. Influence of “effective microorganism” (EM) on vegetative production and carbon mineralization a preliminary investigation. J. Sustainable Agric., 14: 15-25.
  7. Fageri, N.K., 2007. Green manuring in crop production. J. of Plant Nutrition, 30: 691-719. FAOSTAT, 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. (Accessed in November, 2012).
  8. Gunes, A., N. Cicek, A. Inal, M. Alpaslan, F. Eraslan, E. Guneri, T. Guzelordu, 2006. Genotipic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at preand post- anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency. Plant & Soil Environ., 52 (8): 368 – 376.Islam, M., 2012. The effect of different rates and forms of sulfur on seed yield and micronutrient uptake by chickpea. Plant and Soil Environ. 58 (9): 399-404.
  9. Jain, P.C., P.S. Kushawaha, U.S. Dhakal, H. Khan, and S.M. Trivedi, 1999. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to phosphorus and biofertilizer. Legume Res., 22: 241-244.
  10. Javaid, A., 2006. Foliar application of effective microorganism on pea as an alternative fertilizer. Agron. for Sustainable Development