SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Comparative Evaluation of Hexaploid Triticale Genotypes Under Irrigation with Saline Water

Pravin Kumar SHARMA
Babita KHOSLA
Mohammad AHATSHAM
Karishma KARİSHMA
Om Prakash BISHNOI
Rishi Kumar Behl BEHL
Pages
50–53
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They should be included in direct cultivation in such environment as well as hybridization programme to develop recombinants possessing high grain yield and tolerance to salinity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A field experiment was conducted in randomized block design in 3 replications at agriculture research farm, Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, to evaluate the production potential of 7 triticale genotypes namely TL2942, TL2969, TL3004, TL3001, TL3003, TL3002 and TL3005 under irrigation with saline water.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The soil is clay loam with EC 118 μS/cm and water from nearby bidhro canal having pH 7.6 to 8.4 depending upon rainfall.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They should be included in direct cultivation in such environment as well as hybridization programme to develop recombinants possessing high grain yield and tolerance to salinity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: 6x triticosecale · grain yield · salinity

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in randomized block design in 3 replications at agriculture research farm, Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, to evaluate the production potential of 7 triticale genotypes namely TL2942, TL2969, TL3004, TL3001, TL3003, TL3002 and TL3005 under irrigation with saline water. The soil is clay loam with EC 118 μS/cm and water from nearby bidhro canal having pH 7.6 to 8.4 depending upon rainfall. The observations were recorded on five randomly selected plants in each replication for each genotype and the mean data for grain yield and its attributes: plant height, number of tillers per plant, number of ears per plant, number of spikelet’s per spike, dry weight of 100 grains, grain yield per plant and test weight were subjected to analysis of variance. The results revealed significant differences among 7 triticale genotypes for grain yield and its attributes. Among seven triticale varieties TL3002 was found superior for grain yield (7.5g/plant), number of spikelets per spike (16.88) whereas TL3001 scored highest number of tillers per plant (6.2), number of ears per plant (6.21), test weight (15.79) and TL2969 scored highest plant height (88.2 cm) and number of spikelets per spike (16.88). These genotypes may possess genes for salinity tolerance as evidenced by their performance in predominantly saline soil and water used. They should be included in direct cultivation in such environment as well as hybridization programme to develop recombinants possessing high grain yield and tolerance to salinity.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHARMA, P. K., KHOSLA, B., AHATSHAM, M., KARİSHMA, K., BISHNOI, O. P., BEHL, R. K. B. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Hexaploid Triticale Genotypes Under Irrigation with Saline Water. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 50–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/753136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arya RK, Renu Munjal and Dhanda SS (2016). Comparative performance of triticale, durum, synthetic and bread wheat for chlorophyll fluorescence traits under heat stress conditions. Agric International 3: 25-32.
  2. Blum A (2014). The Abiotic Stress Response and Adaptation of Triticale-A Review. Cereal Research Communications 42(3), Pp. 359-375
  3. Balatero CH and Darvey NL (1993). Influence of selected wheat and rye genotypes on the direct synthesis of hexaploid triticale. Euphytica 66: 179-185
  4. Bartels D and Sunkar R (2005). Drought and Salt Tolerance in Plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 23-58.
  5. Bona L (2004). Triticale in Hungary. In: Mergoum, M., Gómez-Macpherson, H. (eds), Triticale Improvement and Production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper no. 179. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Pp. 119-122.
  6. Dumbrava M, Ion V, Epure LI, Basa AG, Ion N and Dusa EM (2016). Grain Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 10 (2016) 94 -103 Farrell DJ, Chan C, McCrae F and McKenzie RJ (1983). A nutritional evaluation of triticale with pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 9, Issue 1, July, Pp. 49-62
  7. Mergoum M, Singh P, Pena R, Lozano-del Río A, Cooper K, Salmon D et al. (2009). “Triticale: a “new” crop with old challenges,” in Cereals, eds M. Mergoum, P. K. Singh, R. J. Pena, A. J. Lozano-del Rio, K. V. Cooper, D. F. Salmon, et al. (Berlin: Springer), Pp.267-287. Munns R, and Tester M (2008). Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59:651-681.
  8. Tang X, Mu X, Shao H, Wang H and Brestic M (2015). Global plant-responding Mechanisms to Salt Stress: Physiological and Molecular Levels and Implications in Biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 425-437.