Journals / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2023 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Genetic Variability among Winter Cereal Genotypes for Response to Protein Hydrolysate (PH) for Grain Yield and Its Attributes

Pardeep Kumar(Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana)
Pritam Yadav(Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana)
Pravin Kumar Sharma(Faculty of Agriculture, Maharishi Markandeshwar University)
Machiavelli Sıngh(Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana)
Rishi K. Behl(Faculty of Agriculture, Maharishi Markandeshwar University)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall production of plots increased as in wheat (11.9±0.86%), triticale (12.14±0.86%), and barley (12.8±0.29%) comparison to control plot.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A field experiment-based study was conducted using 19 different varieties of cereal crops i.e. eight of wheat (black wheat, WH1105, WH1142, HD2967, WH1124, DBW88, WH1025, WH1080), seven of triticale (TL3003, TL3002, TL3001, TL3004, TL2942, TL3005, TL2969 and four of barley (BH885, BH902, BH946, BH393) in research facility at agriculture farms of Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar during Rabi 2020-21.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The test plot given the treatment of foliar spray having approximately 8% (v/v) nitrogen and 8-10% (w/v) carbon diluted 5ml/l with water after seed germination of 40 days followed by three sprays after interval of 25 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall production of plots increased as in wheat (11.9±0.86%), triticale (12.14±0.86%), and barley (12.8±0.29%) comparison to control plot.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Amino acid · human hair "waste" hydrolysate · cereals

Abstract

A field experiment-based study was conducted using 19 different varieties of cereal crops i.e. eight of wheat (black wheat, WH1105, WH1142, HD2967, WH1124, DBW88, WH1025, WH1080), seven of triticale (TL3003, TL3002, TL3001, TL3004, TL2942, TL3005, TL2969 and four of barley (BH885, BH902, BH946, BH393) in research facility at agriculture farms of Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar during Rabi 2020-21. The physiological and agronomical parameters were analyzed in three cereal crops wheat, triticale and barley using a waste human hair (amino acids hydrolysate developed by protein hydrolysis techniques). The test plot given the treatment of foliar spray having approximately 8% (v/v) nitrogen and 8-10% (w/v) carbon diluted 5ml/l with water after seed germination of 40 days followed by three sprays after interval of 25 days. The comparison of control and test showed increase in height of wheat (2.9±0.25%), triticale (3.5±0.45%), and barley (2.2±0.22%). The increase in spike length observed in wheat (2.01±0.6%), triticale (1.73±0.17%), and barley (2.9±0.27%). The overall production of plots increased as in wheat (11.9±0.86%), triticale (12.14±0.86%), and barley (12.8±0.29%) comparison to control plot. This analysis from this study concludes that the foliar application of protein hydrolysate shows significant results on the plant height, spike length and yield of crops. The accumulation of protein hydrolysate varies among cereal genotypes. This type of protein hydrolysate having short peptide and free amino acids are accumulated directly by plants and enhance the growth and maintained plants health. The application can be an alternative of chemical-based fertilizers and reduce the environment pollution.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kumar, P., Yadav, P., Sharma, P. K., Sıngh, M., Behl, R. K. (2023). Genetic Variability among Winter Cereal Genotypes for Response to Protein Hydrolysate (PH) for Grain Yield and Its Attributes. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1477764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Calvo P, Nelson L, and Kloepper JW, (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3-41. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8.
  2. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Canaguier R, Svecova E and Cardarelli M, (2014). Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Front. Plant Sci. 5:448. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00448.
  3. Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L and Canaguier R, (2015). Protein hydrolysate as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Horti. 96:28-38. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.037
  4. Colla G, Hoagland L, Ruzzi M, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Canaguier R and Rouphael Y, (2017) Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. 8:2202. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02202
  5. Ertani A, Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, Sambo P, Sanchez-Cortes S and Nardi S, (2014). Capsicum chinense L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: chemical and metabolomic approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 5:1-12.
  6. Halpern M, Bar-Tal A, Ofek M, Minz D, Muller T and Yermiyahu U, (2015). The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Adv. Agron. 130:141-174. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00597.
  7. Kumar P, Behl J, Singh M and Behl R, (2021). Efficacy of protein hydrolysate (plant force advance) based formulation on cotton yield. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 7(1):43-47. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ekinjournal/ issue/60162/872676
  8. Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Canguier R, Kumar P and Colla G, (2015). The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. 182:124-133.
  9. Mostafa MA, Manal Mubarak NS, Khalil G and Mohamad H, (2014). Manufacturing amino acids bio fertilizers from agricultural wastes-Effect of synthetic organic fertilizers on the growth and yield of some forage crops as well as some soil properties J. Soil Sci. and Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ., 5(2):279-294.
  10. Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Schiavon M and Ertani A, (2016). Plant biostimulants: Physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73:18-23. doi: 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006.
  11. Popko M, Michalak I, Wilk R, Gramza M, Chojnacka K and Górecki H, (2018). Effect of the new plant growth biostimulants based on amino acids on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Molecules. 23(2):470. DOI: 10.3390/ molecules23020470.
  12. Subbarao SB, Aftab Hussain IS and Ganesh PT, (2015). Biostimulant activity of protein hydrolysate: Influence on plant growth and yield. J Plant Sci Res. 2(2):125.
  13. Teixeira WF, Fagan EB, Soares LH,Soares JN, Reichardt K and Neto DD, (2018). Seed treatment and foliar application of amino acids improve variables of nitrogen metabolism and productivity in soybean Crop. Front. Plant Sci. 9:396.doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00396
  14. Yadav S and Khosla B, (2020). Biostimulant effect of poultry feather hydrolysate on maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Annals of Biology 36 (3):508-512. Vasudeva, V. (2022). Explained What are India’s plans to avert a wheat crisis?
  15. Kumar P, Behl J, Singh M and Behl R, (2021). Efficacy of protein hydrolysate (plant force advance) based formulation on cotton yield. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 7(1):43-47. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ekinjournal/ issue/60162/872676