Journals / Dijital Çağda İşletmecilik Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Monitoring National Payment Schemes: Some Global Practices and Turkish Payment Scheme – Troy

Pages
67–75
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, despite of the mighty global payment actors, basis of existence and future value of national schemes are summarized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the beginning of 21.st century, disruptive innovations in technology have ushered a new era in payment systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article has been inspired by TROY, which is the “Turkey’s Payment Method” in Turkish, and it aims to put the local payment schemes on the map of Turkish Academia by exemplifying some best practices, why have been needed and what are the expectations lying behind them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, despite of the mighty global payment actors, basis of existence and future value of national schemes are summarized.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Payment · National Payment Schemes · TROY

Abstract

Since the beginning of 21.st century, disruptive innovations in technology have ushered a new era in payment systems. This article has been inspired by TROY, which is the “Turkey’s Payment Method” in Turkish, and it aims to put the local payment schemes on the map of Turkish Academia by exemplifying some best practices, why have been needed and what are the expectations lying behind them. It consists of five chapter which starts with the historical framework of modern cards payment industry and popularized concept; “cashless society”. In the second part, the answer to the question of “who are the key participants in a payment system?” is examined. In this context, modernized definition of the payment is made by shortly introducing some of new and ever-changing payment methods, namely mobile payments or crypto-currencies. Meanwhile, some countries have established their own payment schemes to gain advantages in the forthcoming technology race. Major national payment schemes are listed and occasionally analyzed in terms of implementations. Hereby, TROY is reviewed concisely and explained in terms of main features as a noteworthy implementation. Finally, despite of the mighty global payment actors, basis of existence and future value of national schemes are summarized.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYALIDEREDEN, D., ÇETİNER, M. (2018). Monitoring National Payment Schemes: Some Global Practices and Turkish Payment Scheme – Troy. Dijital Çağda İşletmecilik Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 67–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/750152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Arango, C., Huynh, K. P., & Sabetti, L. (2015, June). Consumer Payment Choice: Merchant Card Acceptance versus Pricing Incentives. Journal of Banking & Finance. Bankalararası Kart Merkezi. (2017). Kart Monitör. İstanbul. https://bkm.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Kart_Monitor_2017.pdf adresinden alındı Bankalararası Kart Merkezi. (2018). Türkiye Kartlı Ödemeler Raporu. İstanbul:
  2. BKM. Bos, P. V. (2006). INTERNATIONAL SCRUTINY OF PAYMENT CARD SYSTEMS. Antitrust Law Journal, 739-777.
  3. Bruggink, D. (2016, Temmuz 26). The Turkish payment market and its specifics. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 230-237. Business Insider Intelligence. (2016, Ağutos 29). Business Insider. Kasım 11, 2018 tarihinde https://www.businessinsider.com/india-has-launched-a-national-mobile-payments-ecosystem-2016-8 adresinden alındı Chaplin, J., & Veitch, A. (2012). The Outlook for National Payment Schemes in a Global Economy. London. Chaplin, J., Veitch, A., & Bott, P. (2014). National Payments Schemes: Drivers of Economic and Social Benefits. London: Anthemis Group. Kasım 15, 2018 tarihinde alındı Deokar, B. K., & Krishnan, K. (2012, Mayıs 26). RuPay Card an Alternative. Economic and Political Weekly, 21-24. Ekim 24, 2018 tarihinde alındı Edgar&Dunn. (2015). Turkey Advanced Payment Report. London. Gupta, D. D. (2017). WHY RUPAY CARD FOR INDIA. Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar. SSRN. Gürkaynak, G., & Yılmaz, İ. (2015). Regulating payment services and electronic money:A Comperative Regulatory Approch with a Specific Focus on TurkishLegislation. Computer Law & Security Review, 401-411. Hurriyet Gazetesi. (2018, Ocak 6). Kasım 15, 2018 tarihinde Blockchain Nedir?: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/teknoloji/blockchain-nedir-nasil-calisiyor-40701324 adresinden alındı Knowledge@Wharton. (2018, Ağustos 31). http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu. wharton: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/going-cashless-can-learn-swedens-experience/ adresinden alındı Liu, J., Kauffman, R. J., & Ma, D. (2015, March). Competition, cooperation, and regulation: Understanding the evolution. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 373-391. Milliyet Gazetesi. (2018, Ekim 17). Bkm 2018 Yılı Eylül Ayı Verilerini Açıkladı. Kasım 11, 2018 tarihinde Milliyet: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/bkm-2018-yili-eylul-ayi-verilerini-acikladi-istanbul-yerelhaber-3097994/ adresinden alındı Özkan, A. (2015). Türkiye'nin Kartlı Ödeme Sistemleri Tarihi. İstanbul: ARYAN Basım Tanıtım ve Matbaa Hiz