The aim of this paper is to consider family values as a potential to build core competence in family businesses in accordance with tacit knowledge To be aware of core competence is a source of competetive advantage in the market for businesses The application of this advantage merging it with tacit knowledge management is the main point of the study
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to consider family values as a potential to build core competence in family businesses in accordance with tacit knowledge To be aware of core competence is a source of competetive advantage in the market for businesses The application of this advantage merging it with tacit knowledge management is the main point of the study
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this paper is to consider family values as a potential to build core competence in family businesses in accordance with tacit knowledge To be aware of core competence is a source of competetive advantage in the market for businesses The application of this advantage merging it with tacit knowledge management is the main point of the study
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this paper is to consider family values as a potential to build core competence in family businesses in accordance with tacit knowledge To be aware of core competence is a source of competetive advantage in the market for businesses The application of this advantage merging it with tacit knowledge management is the main point of the study
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to consider family values as a potential to build core competence in family businesses in accordance with tacit knowledge To be aware of core competence is a source of competetive advantage in the market for businesses The application of this advantage merging it with tacit knowledge management is the main point of the study
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı, aile işletmelerinin yönetiminde etkin olan aile değerlerinin özyetenek oluşturma potansiyelini örtülü bilgi çerçevesinde ele almaktır. İşletmelerin özyeteneklerinin farkında olarak piyasada iş yapmaları kendileri için bir rekabet avantajıdır. Bu avantajın örtülü bilgi yönetimi anlayışı ile birleştirilerek aile işletmelerinde uygulanması makalenin ana temasını oluşturmaktadır.
🔖
Cite This Article
İBİCİOĞLU, D. D. H., AK, A. G. B. (2005). Aile işletmelerinde Aile Değerlerinin Özyetenek Oluşturma Potansiyeli: Örtülü Bilgi Eksenli Bir Analiz. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 315–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/74140
Akgemci, T., ve Sevinç, İ. (2004), “Aile İşletmelerinde Büyümenin Kavramsal Analizi” T.C. İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi 1. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, (40):512-520
Aldrich H. E. ve Cliff J. E. (2003), “The Pervasive Effects of Family on Entrepreneurship: Toward a Family Embeddedness Perspective”, Journal of Business Venturing, (18): 573-596.
Barney, B., J. (1996), “Organizational Culture: Can It Be A Source of Sustained Competetive Advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, 11, (3):656-666.
Boiral, O. (2002), “Tacit Knowledge and Environmental Management”, Long Range Planning, (35): 291-317.
Grant, M., R. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competetive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation” California Management Review, (Spring):114-125.
Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M., A., Hoskisson, R. E., ve Ireland, R. D. (1991), “Synergies and Post-Acquistion Performance: Differences versus Similarities in Resource Allocations”, Journal of Management, 17, (1):173-190.
Heck, R.K.Z. ve Trent, E. S., “The prevalence of family business from household sample”, Family Business Review, Cilt 12, Sayı 3, 1999, s. 209-224.
Karpuzoğlu, E. (2002), Büyüyen ve Gelişen Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaşma, Hayat Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Koçel, T., 1999,
İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Koskinen K. U. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge as a Promoter of Project Success” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, (6):41-47.
Lubit, R. (2001), “Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management: The Keys to Sustainable Competetive Advantage” Org. Dynamics, 29, (4):167-178.
Manfred, D. V., ve Kets, F., R. (1993), “The Dynamics of Family-Controlled Firms:The Good and The Bad News”, Organizational Dynamics, 22, (3):52-63.
Mascitelli, R., (2000), “From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achive Breakthrough Innovation”, Prod. Innov. Manag., (17):179-193. Prahalad C.K. ve Hamel G., (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68, (3):79-91.
Schulz, M., ve Jobe, L. A., (2001), “Codification and Tacitness As Knowledge Management Strategies An Emprical Exploration”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, (12): 139-165
Teece, D., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., Winter, S. (1994), “Understanding Corporate Coherence” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, (1): 1-30.
Tuzcu, C. (2002), Aile Şirketlerinde Karar Alma Mekanizmaları, Bir Karar Alma Model Önerisi, Gaziantep Bölgesinde Bir Aile