Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35

THE BANLIEUE AS A SPACE OF VIOLENCE IN DOMINIQUE MANOTTI’S NOVEL TEŞKİLATIN GÖZDESİ

DOMINIQUE MANOTTI’NİN TEŞKİLATIN GÖZDESİ BAŞLIKLI ROMANINDA BİR ŞİDDET UZAMI OLARAK BANLİYÖ

Ahmet Özkan(GALATASARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5270-2333
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Manotti thus challenges the established image of the banlieue as an inherently violent space and instead shows how violence is produced through the relations of power that govern, classify, and transform Panteuil.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dominique Manotti’s Bien connu des services de police (2010) is set in the fictional banlieue of Panteuil, which evokes the north-eastern outskirts of Paris and, more specifically, Seine-Saint-Denis, shortly before the 2005 suburban riots.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study shows that security is distributed unequally in Panteuil: while police surveillance is concentrated on particular neighbourhoods and social groups, the demands for protection made by certain victims are pushed into the background.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Manotti thus challenges the established image of the banlieue as an inherently violent space and instead shows how violence is produced through the relations of power that govern, classify, and transform Panteuil.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dominique Manotti · banliyö · şiddet

Abstract

Dominique Manotti’s Bien connu des services de police (2010) is set in the fictional banlieue of Panteuil, which evokes the north-eastern outskirts of Paris and, more specifically, Seine-Saint-Denis, shortly before the 2005 suburban riots. This study examines how Panteuil is constructed as a space of violence and how violence is distributed across the novel’s social, institutional, and spatial structures. The analysis draws primarily on Henri Lefebvre’s conception of the social production of space, Johan Galtung’s distinction between direct, structural, and cultural violence, and Loïc Wacquant’s concepts of territorial stigmatization and the punitive state. The approaches of Smith, Bourdieu, Walby, and Benjamin are also used to examine the relationships among urban redevelopment, official discourse, and institutional power. The study shows that security is distributed unequally in Panteuil: while police surveillance is concentrated on particular neighbourhoods and social groups, the demands for protection made by certain victims are pushed into the background. Violence therefore takes multiple forms in the novel, including police intervention, economic and sexual exploitation, eviction, territorial stigmatization, institutional indifference, the manipulation of records, and the production of official narratives. Urban redevelopment and real-estate interests further reveal the economic dimension of this violence by becoming closely connected with security policies. Manotti thus challenges the established image of the banlieue as an inherently violent space and instead shows how violence is produced through the relations of power that govern, classify, and transform Panteuil.

Özet

Dominique Manotti’nin Teşkilatın Gözdesi (Bien connu des services de police, 2010) adlı romanı, 2005 banliyö ayaklanmalarının hemen öncesinde, Paris’in kuzeydoğusunu ve Seine-Saint-Denis bölgesini çağrıştıran kurmaca Panteuil banliyösünde geçer. Bu çalışma, Panteuil’ün romanda nasıl bir şiddet uzamı olarak kurulduğunu ve şiddetin kent içindeki toplumsal, kurumsal ve mekânsal dağılımını incelemektedir. Çözümlemede Lefebvre’in mekânın toplumsal üretimine ilişkin yaklaşımı, Galtung’un doğrudan, yapısal ve kültürel şiddet ayrımı ile Wacquant’ın mekânsal damgalama ve cezalandırıcı devlet kavramları temel alınmakta; kentsel dönüşüm, resmî söylem ve kurumsal güç ilişkilerinin değerlendirilmesinde Smith, Bourdieu, Walby ve Benjamin’in görüşlerinden de yararlanılmaktadır. İnceleme, Panteuil’de güvenliğin toplumsal gruplar arasında eşit biçimde dağıtılmadığını; polis denetiminin belirli mahalleler ve gruplar üzerinde yoğunlaşırken kimi mağdurların koruma taleplerinin geri plana itildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Romanda şiddet, fiziksel müdahalenin yanı sıra ekonomik ve cinsel sömürü, tahliye, mekânsal damgalama, kurumsal kayıtsızlık, kayıtların değiştirilmesi ve resmî söylemin oluşturulması yoluyla da sürdürülür. Kentsel dönüşüm ve gayrimenkul çıkarları ise güvenlik politikalarıyla bağlantı kurarak şiddetin ekonomik boyutunu açığa çıkarır. Manotti böylece banliyöyü kendiliğinden şiddet üreten bir coğrafya olarak ele alan yerleşik imgeyi sorgular ve şiddetin Panteuil’ü yöneten, sınıflandıran ve dönüştüren güç ilişkileri içinde nasıl üretildiğini gösterir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, A. (2026). THE BANLIEUE AS A SPACE OF VIOLENCE IN DOMINIQUE MANOTTI’S NOVEL TEŞKİLATIN GÖZDESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.2025120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Avenel, C. (2009). La construction du « problème des banlieues » entre ségrégation et stigmatisation. Journal français de psychiatrie, 34, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.3917/jfp.034.0036
  2. Benjamin, W. (2019). Pour une critique de la violence (A. Wiser, Çev.). Éditions Allia.
  3. Body-Gendrot, S. (2010). Police marginality, racial logics and discrimination in the banlieues of France. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(4), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870903325661
  4. Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989–1992 (D. Fernbach, Çev.; P. Champagne, R. Lenoir, F. Poupeau, & M.-C. Rivière, Eds.). Polity.
  5. Dikeç, M. (2002). Police, politics, and the right to the city. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010828.40053.de
  6. Fassin, D. (2013). Enforcing order: An ethnography of urban policing (R. Gomme, Çev.). Polity.
  7. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
  8. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005
  9. Grydehøj, A. (2016). Cases of identity: Citizenship, gender and ethnicity in French and Scandinavian engaged crime fiction 1965–2015 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kent]. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/60196/
  10. Horvath, C. (2016). Écrire la banlieue dans les années 2000–2015. In B. Wallon (Ed.), Banlieues vues d’ailleurs (pp. 47–64). CNRS Éditions. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.20700
  11. Jobard, F. (2021). Policing the banlieues. In J. de Maillard & W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Policing in France (pp. 202–218). Routledge.
  12. Kimyongür, A. (2013). Dominique Manotti and the roman noir. Contemporary Women’s Writing, 7(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/cww/vps012
  13. Kimyongür, A. (2015). Social conflict in the contemporary French roman noir. The Australian Journal of Crime Fiction, 1(1). https://www.australiancrimefiction.com/social-conflict-kimyongur
  14. Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın üretimi (I. Ergüden, Çev.; 2. bs.). Sel Yayıncılık.
  15. Manotti, D. (2017). Teşkilatın gözdesi (Ş. Çiltaş Solmaz, Çev.). Dipnot Yayınları.
  16. Marcu, I. (2021). Le polar « de banlieue » comme scène de déploiement du malaise social français: Le cas des romans « dyonisiens » de Rachid Santaki. Intercâmbio, 14, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.21747/0873-366X/int14a5
  17. Peralva, A. (1995). Violence de banlieue et politisation juvénile. Cultures & Conflits, 18. https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.451
  18. Platten, D. (2007). Violence and the saint: Political commitment in the fiction of Jean Amila. In D. Gascoigne (Ed.), Violent histories: Violence, culture and identity in France from surrealism to the néo-polar (pp. 175–198). Peter Lang.
  19. Reid, D. (2015). The red and the black: Marie-Noëlle Thibault and the novels of Dominique Manotti. French Cultural Studies, 26(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957155815587244
  20. Roux, G. (2017). Expliquer le rejet de la police en banlieue: Discriminations, « ciblage des quartiers » et racialisation. Un état de l’art. Droit et société, 97(3), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.097.0555
  21. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge.
  22. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  23. Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513607082003
  24. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
  25. Walby, S. (2013). Violence and society: Introduction to an emerging field of sociology. Current Sociology, 61(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112456478
  26. Marcu, I. (2021). Le polar « de banlieue » comme scène de déploiement du malaise social français: Le cas des romans « dyonisiens » de Rachid Santaki. Intercâmbio, 14, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.21747/0873-366X/int14a5