Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Second Home Tourism in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey: Development Issue and Mobility Pattern

Pages
63–82
Publication Date
2019-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study is also a pioneer research about the second homes in the mountainous area at Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Eastern Black Sea Region is one of the most important regions in the development of second home tourism for the mountainous areas in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary data were collected by the use of questionnaire surveys conducted with a total of 900 second homeowner selected by convenience sampling during July 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study is also a pioneer research about the second homes in the mountainous area at Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:second homes · second home tourism · mountainous areas

Abstract

Eastern Black Sea Region is one of the most important regions in the development of second home tourism for the mountainous areas in Turkey. There is considerable literature gap on research about second-home tourism in the mountainous areas of Turkey. For this reason, in this study, we aim to determine the development issue and mobility patterns of second home tourism in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. The research population consists of seven provinces located in the Eastern Black Sea region. The sample of the study is thirty highlands in Eastern Black Sea Region. A multistage cluster sampling technique was applied at the sample selection. The primary data were collected by the use of questionnaire surveys conducted with a total of 900 second homeowner selected by convenience sampling during July 2010. A total of 60 digital TIFF format monoscopic aerial photographs were analysed by using Erdas Imagine LPS and ArcGIS 9.3 software for showing the second home increase in the area. At the sampling highlands, 2.830 dwelling units have increased in the last thirty years. According to the questionnaire results of the study, second homeowners generally come to the region in May and June. Most of them leave the area in September. Second homeowners spend mostly 91-120 days in the region. The beautiful landscape and weather conditions are main motivations to acquire a second home from the region. Second-home demand in the region is gradually increasing. Therefore, the determination of main motivation sources for the second home demand and movement pattern towards the second homes provide useful information for planning issues. The study is also a pioneer research about the second homes in the mountainous area at Turkey.

Özet

Eastern Black Sea Region is one of the most important region in that development of second home tourism for the mountainous areas in Turkey. Second-home tourism in the mountainous areas is the important literature gap in Turkey. For this reason in this study we aim to determine development issue and mobility pattern of second home tourism in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. The research population is the highlands where located in seven provinces in the Eastern Black Sea region. The sample of the study is thirty highlands in Eastern Black Sea Region. Multistage cluster sampling technique was applied at the sample selection. The primary datas were collected questionnaire surveys were conducted with a total of 900 second home owner selected by convenience sampling during July 2010. A total of 60 digital TIFF format monoscopic aerial photographs was analysed by using Erdas Imagine LPS and ArcGIS 9.3 software for show the second home increase in the area. At the sampling highlands 2.830 dwelling units have increased last thirty years. According to the questionnaire results of the study, second home owners generally come to the region at May and June. Most of them leave the area in September. Second home owner spend mostly 91-120 days in the region. The beautiful landscape and weather condition are main motivation to acquire a second home from the region. Second home demand in the region is gradually increasing. Therefore, determination of main motivation sources for the second home demand and movements pattern towards the second homes provide useful information for planning issue. The study is also pioneer research about the second homes in the mountainous area at Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOMUNCU, M., OKUYUCU, A., ALTUNDAL, M. (2019). Second Home Tourism in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey: Development Issue and Mobility Pattern. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 63–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/734458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alagöz,C.A. 1993. Türkiye’de Yaylacılık Araştırmaları. Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2: 1-51.
  2. Alkan, M.Ö. 2014. Osmanlı’da sayfiyenin icadı. p.15-44. Editor: T.Bora. Sayfiye Hafiflik Hayali. İletişimYayınları,
  3. İstanbul.
  4. Araonsson, L. 2004. Place Attachment of Vacation Resident: Between Tourists and Permanenet Residents. p. 75-86. Editors: C.M. Hall & D. K. Müller. Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground. Channel View Publications: Clevedon. Barke, M. 2007. Second Homes in Spain: An Analysis of Change at the Provincial Level, 1981–2001. Geography, 92(3): 195–207.
  5. Benson, M., O’Reilly, K. 2009. Migration and Search for a Better Way of Life: A Critical Exploration of Lifestyle Migration. The Sociological Review, 57(4): 608-625.
  6. Bijker, R.A., Haartsen, T., 2012. More Than Counterurbanization: Migration to Popular and Less-Popular Rural areas in the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place, 18: 643-657.
  7. Casado-Diaz, M. 2012. Exploring the Geographies of Lifestyle Mobility: Current and Future Fields of Enquiry. p. 120-125. Editor: J. Wilson. The Routledge Handbook of Tourism Geographies. Routledge: London and New York. Construction Law. 1985. T.C. Official Newspaper, 3194, 03, May 1985.
  8. Cooke, B., Lane, R. 2015. Re-thinking Rural-Amenity Ecologies For Environmental Management in the Anthropocene. Geoforum, 65: 232-242.
  9. Cooperatives Law (1969). T.C. Official Newspaper, 1163, 24 April 1969.
  10. Doğaner, S. 1992. Gemlik Körfezi Kuzey Kıyılarının Turizm Coğrafyası. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 27: 59-84.
  11. Doğaner, S. 1998. Türkiye Kıyı Kullanımında Turizm Olgusu. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 33: 25-52.
  12. Dubin, M., Lucas, E. 1989:
  13. Trekking in Turkey. Lonely Planet, Hong Kong. Emekli, G. 2014. İkinci Konut Kavramı Açısından Turizm Coğrafyasının Önemi ve Türkiye’de İkinci Konutların Gelişimi, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 23(1): 25-42.
  14. Emiroğlu, M. 1977. Bolu’da Yaylalar ve Yaylacılık, Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları: 272, Ankara. General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs (2014), Access: 29 October 2015, http://www.nvi.gov.tr/NVI.html
  15. Jaakson, R. 1986. Second-home Domestic Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 13: 367-391. Japan International Cooperation Agency & State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey 2000: The study on the regional – plan for the Eastern Black Sea Region in the Republic of Turkey (DOKAP) Final Report, Turkey. Kaltenborn, B. P., Clout, H. D. 1998. The Alternate Home-motives of Rec