Journals / Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The relationship between motivation, socio-demographic and travelling characteristics of second home ownership: the case of Yalova-Çınarcık

İkinci konut sahipliliğinde motivasyon, sosyo-demografik özellikler ve seyahat karakteristikleri arasındaki ilişkiler: Yalova-Çınarcık örneği

Pages
39–56
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the factor analysis, the purchase of second homes in Çınarcık, four factors are effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the fact that the second homes is directly related to tourism and recreational purposes, they are often considered as part of the leisure industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Çınarcık district is a place in Turkey where has developed a second home destination from the 1960s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the factor analysis, the purchase of second homes in Çınarcık, four factors are effective.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Second homes · motivation · travel motivation

Abstract

Due to the fact that the second homes is directly related to tourism and recreational purposes, they are often considered as part of the leisure industry. But there is limited literature related to motivation in second home ownership and the reasons behind the choice of destination. Çınarcık district is a place in Turkey where has developed a second home destination from the 1960s. But there is not any research with regard to reason why Çınarcık has developed and preferred as a destination. From this point of view, in this study is aimed to determine underlying dimensions about acquiring second homes and travel motivation of second home owners in Çınarcık. In the study 370 surveys were applied to the second home owners. According to the results of the factor analysis, the purchase of second homes in Çınarcık, four factors are effective. These are comprises; sea-climate and naturebased attractiveness, recreational attractiveness, family and personal reasons and economic reasons. The differences between socio-demographic characteristics, travelling characteristics and motivational factors are identified using t-test and ANOVA. According to the obtained results; statistically significant differences is found variables such as marital status, travel distance, the number of people who vacation in second homes and various motivational factors

Özet

İkinci konutlar turizm ve rekreasyonel amaçlarla doğrudan ilişkili olduğu için, çoğu zaman boş zaman endüstrisinin bir parçası olarak dikkate alınmaktadırlar. Ancak ikinci konut sahipliliğindeki motivasyon kaynakları ve destinasyon seçimi altında yatan nedenlerle ilgili kısıtlı bir literatür vardır. Çınarcık ilçesi Türkiye’de 1960’lardan itibaren ikinci konut destinasyonu olarak gelişme göstermiş bir yerdir. Fakat Çınarcık’ta destinasyonun gelişme ve tercih edilme nedenleri ile ilgili herhangi bir araştırma yapılmamıştır. Bundan hareketle bu çalışmada, Çınarcık’ta ikinci konut sahiplerinin, ikinci konut edinme ve seyahat motivasyonu altında yatan boyutları tanımlamak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 370 ikinci konut sahibine anket uygulanmıştır. Faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre, Çınarcık’tan ikinci konut satın almada deniz-iklim ve doğa kaynaklı çekicilikler, rekreasyonel çekicilikler, aile ve kişisel nedenler ve ekonomik nedenler olmak üzere dört faktör etkili olmaktadır. Sosyodemografik özellikler, seyahat karakteristikleri ve motivasyon faktörleri arasındaki farklılıklar t testi ve ANOVA testi kullanılarak tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlarına göre; medeni durum, seyahat mesafesi ve ikinci konutlarda tatil yapan kişi sayısı gibi değişkenler ile çeşitli motivasyon faktörleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklar bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUYUCU, A., SOMUNCU, M. (2016). The relationship between motivation, socio-demographic and travelling characteristics of second home ownership: the case of Yalova-Çınarcık. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 39–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/163691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Araonsson, L. (2004) “Place attachment of vacation resident: between tourists and permanenet residents”, In Hall, C.M.; Müller, D. K. (eds), Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, 75-86.
  2. Armstrong, A.; Stedman, R.C. (2013) “Culture clash and second home ownership in the U.S. Northern Forest”. Rural Sociology, 78 (3), 318–345.
  3. Baloğlu, S. (1997) “The relationship between destination images and sociodemographic and trip characteristics of international travellers”, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 3(3), 221-233.
  4. Barke, M. (2007) “Second homes in Spain: an analysis of change at the provincial level, 1981–2001”, Geography, 92(3), 195-207.
  5. Caber, M.; Albayrak, T. (2016) “Push or pull? Identifying rock climbing tourists motivations”, Tourism Management, 55, 74- 84. Casado-Diaz, M. A. (1999) “ Socio-demographic impacts of residential tourism: a case study of Torrevieja, Spain”, International Journal of Tourism Research, 1, 223-237.
  6. Chaplin, D. (1999) “Consuming work/productive leisure: the consumption patterns of second home environments”, Leisure Studies, 18(1), 41-55.
  7. Clout, H.D. (1969) “Second homes in France”, Journal of the Town Planning Institute, 55, 440-443.
  8. Clout, H. D. (1972) “Second homes in the United States”, Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 63(6), 393- 401. Cohen, E. (1974) “Who is a tourist? A conceptual clarification”, The Sociological Review, 22(4), 527-555.
  9. Coppock, J.T. (1977) Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Pergamon, Oxford. Crompton, J. L. (1979) “Motivations for pleasure vacation”, Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424.
  10. Çınarcık Life (2015), Erişim: 03 Ocak 2016, http://www.cinarciklife.com/cinarcik/
  11. Dann, G. M. (1977) “Anomie, ego-enhancement and tourism”. Annals of tourism research, 4(4), 184-194.
  12. Dijst, M.; Lanzendorf, M.; Barendregt, A.; Smit, L. (2005) “Second homes in Germany and the Netherlands: ownership and travel impact explained”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(2), 139-152.
  13. Emekli, G. (2014) “İkinci konut kavramı açısından turizm coğrafyasının önemi ve Türkiye’de ikinci konutların gelişimi”, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 23(1), 25-42.
  14. Flognfeldt, T. (2002) “Second-home ownership: a sustainable semi-migration” In Hall, C.M., Williams, A.M. (eds.), Tourism and migration new relationships between production and consumption, Springer, Montreal, 187-204.
  15. Gallent, N.; Mace, A.; Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005) Second homes: European pe