SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Ethical Problems Facing Teachers in Online Discussion Forums

Öğretmenlerin Forum Sayfalarında Karşılaştıkları Etik Sorunlar

Mehmet SİNCAR
C. Teyyar UĞURLU
Pages
737–758
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In character category, the participants reported that they had encountered irresponsibility, selfishness, lie, causticity; in aggression category, the participants reported they had encountered violation of private life, provocation, sexual harassment, defamation and bullying; in obsession category, the participants reported they had encountered monomania, dependency and trap; in disrespect category the participants reported that they had encountered violation of the right to speak and illegal file sharing

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was carried out with the participation of teachers working in Gaziantep and was a qualitative study with a maximum variation sample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were obtained by focus group interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In character category, the participants reported that they had encountered irresponsibility, selfishness, lie, causticity; in aggression category, the participants reported they had encountered violation of private life, provocation, sexual harassment, defamation and bullying; in obsession category, the participants reported they had encountered monomania, dependency and trap; in disrespect category the participants reported that they had encountered violation of the right to speak and illegal file sharing
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etik · etik problemler · siber etik

Abstract

The research was carried out with the participation of teachers working in Gaziantep and was a qualitative study with a maximum variation sample. The data were obtained by focus group interviews. According to the analysis of the data, the issues experienced by the participants on the forum pages are collected under four categories: character, aggression, obsession and disrespect. In character category, the participants reported that they had encountered irresponsibility, selfishness, lie, causticity; in aggression category, the participants reported they had encountered violation of private life, provocation, sexual harassment, defamation and bullying; in obsession category, the participants reported they had encountered monomania, dependency and trap; in disrespect category the participants reported that they had encountered violation of the right to speak and illegal file sharing

Özet

Bu araştırma maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesi kullanılarak Gaziantep’te görev yapan öğretmenlerin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen nitel bir çalışmadır. Araştırma kapsamında yer alan veriler odak grup görüşmeleri ile elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, öğretmenlerin forum sayfalarında karşılaştıkları etik problemlerin karakter, saldırganlık, takıntı ve saygısızlık olarak adlandırılan kategoriler altında toplandığını göstermektedir. Öğretmenler forum sayfalarında karakter kategorisine ilişkin sorumsuzluk, bencillik, yalan, alaycılık; saldırganlık kategorisine ilişkin özel yaşama müdahale, kışkırtma, cinsel taciz, karalama, zorbalık; takıntı kategorisine ilişkin saplantı, bağımlılık, tuzak kurma ve saygısızlık kategorisine ilişkin söz hakkında müdahale ve illegal dosya paylaşımı olarak tanımlanan olumsuz davranışlarla karşılaştıklarını belirtmişlerdir

🔖

Cite This Article

SİNCAR, M., UĞURLU, C. T. (2012). Ethical Problems Facing Teachers in Online Discussion Forums. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 737–758. https://ajindex.com/articles/70413

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Adam, A. (2001).
  2. Computer ethics in a different voice, Information and Organization, 11, 235–261.
  3. Akarsu, B. (1998). Felsefe Terimleri Sözlüğü, 7.Baskı,
  4. İnkılap Kitabevi,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Akman, I. & Mishra, A. (2009). Ethical behavior issues in software use: An analysis of public and private sectors, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1251–1257.
  7. Aydın, İ.(2001) Yönetsel mesleki ve örgütsel etik. Ankara:
  8. Pegem yayıncılık. Bagnall, R. G.(2002) The Contingent University: An Ethical Critique.Educational Philosophy and Theory, (34)1. Bayram, S. (2005) İşletme etiği ve çalışanların şirketlerinde mevcut olan etik uygulamalara ilişkin algılarının ölçümüne yönelik bir araştırma, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi,
  9. Bursa. Beycioğlu, K. (2009) A cyberphilosophical issue in education: Unethical computer using behavior -The case of prospective teachers, Computers & Education, 53, 201–208.
  10. Changeux, J.P.(2002) Etiğin doğal temelleri. (N.Acar, Çev.) Ankara:
  11. Doruk Yayınları.
  12. Chou, C. & Peng, H. (2011) Promoting awareness of Internet safety in Taiwan inservice teacher education: A ten-year experience. Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 44-53.
  13. Clarkburn, H.(2002) The aims and practise of ethics educationin in an undergraduate curriculumreasons for choosing a skills approach. Journal of Higher Education, 26, 4-11.
  14. Furman, G.C.(2004) The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42 (2,) 215-235.
  15. Haynes, F. (2002) Eğitimde etik. (S. K.Akbas, Çev.). İstanbul:
  16. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  17. Hit, W.D. (1990) Ethics and Leadership: Putting Theory Into Practice, Columbus: Battelle Press.
  18. Kuhlemeier, H. & Hemker, B. (2005) The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills, Computers & Education 49, 460–480.
  19. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E. G. (1985).
  20. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Lim, C.P. (2008) Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning Mathematics, English and Science as a global citizen, Computers & Education, 51, 1073–1093.
  21. Myyry, L., Helkama, K. (2002) The Role of Value Priorities and Professional Ethics Training in Moral Sensitivity, Journal of Moral Education, 31( 1), 35- 50. Namlı, A.G., Odabaşı, H.F. (2004) Unethical computer using behavior scale: A study ofreliability and validity on Turkish university students, Computers & Education 48, 205–215.
  22. Özarslan, E. (2006) Sosyal sorumluluk projelerinin desteklenmesinde etik değerlerin rolü üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış yüksek