SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Political Economy of the New Technology Based Firms

Yeni Teknoloji Temelli Firmaların Ekonomi Politiği

Derya GÜLER AYDIN
Pages
627–639
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the second part of the study, the appropriateness of the Schumpeterian framework for these firms will be displayed and Schumpeter's views on the process of capitalist development within the context of new technology based firms will be re-questioned

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:New technology based firms are effective not only changes in economic but also in institutional areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These firms provide continuous technological innovations (creative entrepreneur in Schumpeterian sense) rather than the rationalization process that routinizes the entrepreneur in big firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the second part of the study, the appropriateness of the Schumpeterian framework for these firms will be displayed and Schumpeter's views on the process of capitalist development within the context of new technology based firms will be re-questioned
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeni teknoloji temelli firmalar · radikal yenilikler · Schumpeter

Abstract

New technology based firms are effective not only changes in economic but also in institutional areas. These firms provide continuous technological innovations (creative entrepreneur in Schumpeterian sense) rather than the rationalization process that routinizes the entrepreneur in big firms. The aim of this study is to denote that the Schumpeterian analysis is appropriate framework for the new technology based firms and to introduce the effects of technological innovations of these firms both economic and institutional areas. This study is composed of two parts. In the first part, the basic characteristics of new technology based firms will be examined by the help of the literature. In the second part of the study, the appropriateness of the Schumpeterian framework for these firms will be displayed and Schumpeter's views on the process of capitalist development within the context of new technology based firms will be re-questioned

Özet

Yeni teknoloji temelli firmalar (new technology based firms) sadece iktisadi yapının değil, kurumsal yapının da değişiminde etkilidir. Büyük firmalarda girişimciliği rutinleştiren rasyonalizasyon sürecinin aksine, bu tip firmalarla teknolojik yeniliğin (Schumpeterci anlamda yaratıcı girişimciliğin) sürekliliği sağlanabilmektedir.Bu çalışmanın amacı, yeni teknoloji temelli firmalar için Schumpeter’in analizinin uygun bir teorik çerçeve olduğunu göstermek ve bu firmalardaki teknolojik yeniliğin etkisinin sadece iktisadi alandanda değil, kurumsal alanda da etkileri olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde yazından faydalanarak, yeni teknoloji temelli firmaların nitelikleri incelenecektir. İkinci bölümde ise, Schumpeter’in analizinin yeni teknoloji temelli firmalar için teorik bir çerçeve sağlayacağı gösterilecek ve Schumpeter’in kapitalist gelişme sürecine ilişkin görüşleri yeni teknoloji temelli firmalar bağlamında yeniden sorgulanacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, D. G. (2012). Political Economy of the New Technology Based Firms. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 627–639. https://ajindex.com/articles/70407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abernathy, W.J. ve Clark, K. B. (1985), “Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction”, Research Policy, 14:3-22.
  2. Abernathy W.J. ve Utterback J.M. (1988), “Patterns of Industrial Revolution”, Tulshman ve Moore (ed.), Readings in the Management of Innovation, 25-36,
  3. Ballinger. Andersen, E.S.(1991). Reconstructing Theory Evolution with Special Respect to Schumpeter, A Report from Schumpeter and the Analysis of Economic Evolution, University of Aalborg, August. http://www.business.aau.dk/evolution/esa/ESACV.html.
  4. Baumol W. J. (2002), Free Market Innovation machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton University Press.
  5. Blancflower, D.G. and Oswald, A. (1998), “What Makes an Entrepreneur”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.16, No,1, pp. 26-60.
  6. Birch, D.L.(1979),
  7. The Job Generation Process, Unpublished Report Prepared by Massachusetts Institute of Technology Program on Neigborhood and Regional Change for the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Birch D.L. (1987), Job Creation in America: How Our Smallest Campanies Put the Most People to Work, New York, Free Press.
  8. Bower J.L. ve Christensen C.M. (1995), “Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave”, Harward University Review, 73(1): 43-53.
  9. Brouwer, M. (2002), “Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12,2002: 83-105. Christensen C.M., ve Bower J.L. (1996), “Consumer Power, Strategic Investment and the Failure of Leading Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(3): 197-218.
  10. Christensen C.M. (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Baston, Harward Business School Press.
  11. Christensen C. M. ve Raynor M.E. (2003), The Innovator’s Solution: Cretaing and Sustainig Succesful Growth, Harwoard Business School Press.
  12. Dahms, H.F.(1995). From Creative Action to the Social Rationalization of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Social Theory, Sociological Theory, 13(1),1- 13. Frank, Mark W. (1998), “Schumpeter on Entrepreneurs and Innovation: A Reappraisal”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 20, No, 4, pp: 505- 516. Foster, J. (2000), “Competitive Selection, Self-organization, and Joseph A. Schumpeter,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10: 311-328.
  13. Foster, J. B. (2004) “The End of Rational Capitalism”, Monthly Review,:56, 10: 1- 11. Heertje, A.(2006). Schumpeter’s Model of The Decay of Capitalism, (Ed.) J. Middendorp Schumpeter on the Economics of Innovation and the Develop