Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs About Feedback Concept, Delivery Style and Timing of Feedback

Ortaokul Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Geribildirim Kavramı, Geribildirimin Veriliş Tarzı ve Zamanlaması İle İlgili İnançları

Pages
767–792
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also revealed that the teachers believed it was much easier to provide verbal feedback and had different beliefs about feedback timing

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate secondary school mathematics teachers' beliefs about the concept of feedback, the features of effective feedback, delivery style of feedback, and feedback timing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of the study indicated that the teachers made general statements different from one another while defining the concept of feedback and stressed the evaluative features of feedback that focused on students‟ personalities in addition to the descriptive features that aimed to improve their performances while considering the features of feedback.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also revealed that the teachers believed it was much easier to provide verbal feedback and had different beliefs about feedback timing
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geribildirim kavramı · Etkili geribildirimin özellikleri · Geribildirimin veriliş tarzı

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate secondary school mathematics teachers' beliefs about the concept of feedback, the features of effective feedback, delivery style of feedback, and feedback timing. In line with this aim, the qualitative research method was used in this study. The data were collected from three teachers of Mathematics working in three different secondary schools located in the county of Akçaabat in Trabzon by conducting semi-structured interviews including open-ended and scenariotype questions. The data collected were subject to content analysis, and “data coding” was used as the data analysis technique. The results of the study indicated that the teachers made general statements different from one another while defining the concept of feedback and stressed the evaluative features of feedback that focused on students‟ personalities in addition to the descriptive features that aimed to improve their performances while considering the features of feedback. It was also revealed that the teachers believed it was much easier to provide verbal feedback and had different beliefs about feedback timing

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin geribildirim kavramı, etkili geribildirimin özellikleri, geribildirimin veriliş tarzı ve zamanlaması ile ilgili inanışlarını belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda bu çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler, 2009-2010 eğitimöğretim yılında Trabzon ili Akçaabat ilçesine bağlı 3 farklı ilköğretim okulunda görev yapan 3 matematik öğretmeni ile açık uçlu ve senaryo tipi sorular içeren yarı yapılandırılmış mülakatlar yapılarak elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizine tabi tutularak veri çözümleme tekniklerinden “verilerin kodlanması” kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonunda, öğretmenlerin geribildirim kavramı ile ilgili tanımlamalar yaparken bir birinden farklı genel ifadeler kullandıkları, geribildirimin özellikleri ile ilgili olarak ise öğrencilerin performanslarını geliştirmeye yönelik betimsel özellikleri yanında onların kişiliklerine odaklanan değerlendirmeci özelliklere de vurgu yaptıkları ve sözel geribildirim vermenin daha kolay olduğuna inandıkları ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca geribildirimin veriliş zamanı konusunda farklı inanışlara sahip oldukları sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖĞCE, D., BAKİ, A. (2014). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs About Feedback Concept, Delivery Style and Timing of Feedback. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 767–792. https://ajindex.com/articles/70328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adrienne, R. (1997). Feedback: Enhancing The Performance Of Adult Learners with Learning Disabilities, National Adult Literacy and Learning Disabilities Center, Washington, DC. Askew, S. ve Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In Askew, S. (Ed.), Feedback for Learning. (pp.1-17). London: Routledge. Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik Eğitimi. Harf Eğitim. Yayıncılık. Ankara.
  2. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A. ve Morgan, M. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback In Test-Like Events. Review of Instructional Research. 61(2), 213-238.
  3. Bayraktar, M. (1985). The Effect of Feedback Treatment on Math-Anxiety Levels of Sixth Grade. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu teknik Üniversitesi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Black, P. ve Wiliam, D. (1998a). Inside The Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: Kings College School of Education. Black, P. ve Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.
  6. Brinko, K. T. (1990). Optimal Conditions for Effective Feedback, Paper Presented to The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, Boston, 16-20
  7. April. Brookhard, S.M. (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Yours Students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, USA. Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The Student Perspective. Research in PostCompulsory Education. 12(1), 33-51.
  8. Butler, D.L. ve Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 65, 245-281.
  9. Chickering, A. W. ve Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
  10. Çimer, S.O., Bütüner, S.Ö. ve Yiğit, N., 2010. Öğretmenlerin Öğrencilerine Verdikleri Dönütlerin Tiplerinin ve Niteliklerinin İncelenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 23 (2): 517-538.
  11. Dane, A., Doğar, Ç. ve Balkı, N., (2004). İlköğretim 7. sınıf matematik ders kitaplarının değerlendirmesi. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 1- 18. Ding, L. (1998) Revisiting assessment and learning: implications of students‟ perspectives on assessment feedback, paper presented to Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee, 25–26
  12. September. Doan, L. (2013). Is Feedback a Waste of Time? The Students‟ Perspective. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1(2), 3-10.
  13. Duncan, N. (2007). „Feed-forward‟: Improving Students‟ Use of Tutors‟ Com