Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4

The Relationship between Health Expenditures and Human Development Index in E-7 Countries: Fourier Approach

E-7 Ülkelerinde Sağlık Harcamaları ile İnsani Gelişmişlik Endeksi Arasındaki İlişki: Fourier Yaklaşımı

Pages
2576–2588
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The causality test results show that there is a causality relationship from health expenditures to the human development index for Mexico, and from the human development index to health expenditures for India.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Macroeconomic developments in the E-7 countries, which have a significant size in the global economy, attract the attention of researchers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the relationship between health expenditures and human development index in E-7 countries is examined using annual data for the period 2000-2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The causality test results show that there is a causality relationship from health expenditures to the human development index for Mexico, and from the human development index to health expenditures for India.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Macroeconomic developments in the E-7 countries, which have a significant size in the global economy, attract the attention of researchers. The subject of this study is to examine whether there is a relationship between the health expenditures and the human development index in these countries, and if there is, the direction of this relationship. In this study, the relationship between health expenditures and human development index in E-7 countries is examined using annual data for the period 2000-2018. Panel LM unit root test with breaks, panel Fourier cointegration test and panel Fourier causality test are used in the analyses. As a result of the cointegration test, it has been determined that there is a long-term relationship between health expenditures and the human development index. The causality test results show that there is a causality relationship from health expenditures to the human development index for Mexico, and from the human development index to health expenditures for India.

Özet

Küresel ekonomide önemli bir büyüklüğe sahip olan E-7 ülkelerindeki makroekonomik gelişmeler araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmektedir. Bu ülkelerde yapılan sağlık harcamalarının insani gelişmişlik endeksi ile bir ilişkisi bulunup bulunmadığının ve eğer varsa bu ilişkinin yönünün incelenmesi bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, E-7 ülkelerinde sağlık harcamaları ile insani gelişme endeksi arasındaki ilişki, 2000-2018 dönemi yıllık veriler kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Analizlerde kırılmalı panel LM birim kök testi, panel Fourier eşbütünleşme testi ve panel Fourier nedensellik testi kullanılmıştır. Eşbütünleşme testi sonucunda sağlık harcamaları ile insani gelişme endeksi arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre ise Meksika için sağlık harcamalarından insani gelişme endeksine doğru, Hindistan için insani gelişme endeksinden sağlık harcamalarına doğru nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILKAYA, F., DAĞ, M. (2022). The Relationship between Health Expenditures and Human Development Index in E-7 Countries: Fourier Approach. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4, 2576–2588. https://ajindex.com/articles/645680

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Agarwal, P. (2015). Social Sector Expenditure And Human Development: Empirical Analysis of Indian States. Indian Journal Of Human Development, 9(2), 173–189. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0973703020150202. Ali, S. A., Raza, H., & Yousuf, M. U. (2012). The Role of Fiscal Policy in Human Development: The Pakistan’s Perspective. The Pakistan Development Review, 51(4). Birinci, N, Telatar, O. (2020). The Effect Of Socio-Economic Variables on Public Sector Performance: An Empirical Analysis on Public Expenditure in Turkey. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 42 (2), 202-222. DOI: 10.14780/Muiibd.854314. Çalışkan, Ş. (2012). Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye Harcamaları ve İnsani Gelişmişlik. İş, Güç: Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi. 12(1). 9-28.
  2. Danu, A. (2013). Meeasuring Government Expenditure Efficiencies Towards Peace and Human Development. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM) 6(2), 82–91.
  3. Das, R. C., Mandal, C., & Patra, A. K. (2019). Linkage Between Social Sector’s Spending and HDI: Study On Individual As Well As Panel Data of Indian States. Review Of Social Economy, 0(0), 1–23. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1671605. Edeme, R. K., Emecheta, C., & Omeje, M. O. (2017). Public Health Expenditure and Health Outcomes in Nigeria. American Journal Of Biomedical And Life Sciences, 5(5), 96-102.
  4. Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan, Kose Nezir (2011), Testing for Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Mixed Panels, Econ Model, 28(3):870–876.
  5. Farag, M., Nandakumar, A. K., Wallack, S., Hodgkin, D., Gaumer, G., & Erbil, C. (2013).
  6. Health Expenditures, Health Outcomes and the Role of Good Governance. International Journal Of Health Care Finance And Economics, 13(1), 33-52.
  7. Fisher, Ronald Aylmer (1932), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M., & Tiongson, E. R. (2002). The Effectiveness of Government Spending on Education and Health Care in Developing and Transition Economies. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(4), 717–737. Https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00116-7. https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/Publications/Arastirmalar/Assets/World-In-2050/2050-De-Dunya- Raporu.Pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.06.2021).
  8. Im, K. S., Lee, J., & Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit‐root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393-419.
  9. Im, K. S., Lee, J., & Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit‐root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393-419