SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

The Interaction Effect of Globalization and Human Capital on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey

Küreselleşme ve Beşeri Sermayenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileşim Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Uğur URSAVAŞ
Pages
2157–2167
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the impact ofglobalization on economic growth is conditional on the human capital level in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the interaction effect of globalization and human capital on economicgrowth in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach is appliedin the study, and the dataset covers the period 1984-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the impact ofglobalization on economic growth is conditional on the human capital level in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the interaction effect of globalization and human capital on economicgrowth in Turkey. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach is appliedin the study, and the dataset covers the period 1984-2017. The results show that the impact ofglobalization on economic growth is conditional on the human capital level in Turkey. Thepositive effect of globalization on economic growth increases as the level of human capitalincreases. That is to say, there is a strong complementary relationship between globalization andhuman capital in terms of enhancing the economic growth in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de küreselleşme ve beşeri sermayenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileşim etkisini incelemektedir. Çalışmada gecikmesi dağıtılmış otoregresif (ARDL) sınır testi yöntemi uygulanmaktadır ve veri seti 1984-2017 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Türkiye’de küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin beşeri sermaye düzeyine bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Beşeri sermaye düzeyi arttıkça küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki pozitif etkisi artmaktadır. Yani, küreselleşme ve beşeri sermaye arasında ekonomik büyümeyi artırma açısından güçlü bir tamamlayıcılık ilişkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

URSAVAŞ, U. (2022). The Interaction Effect of Globalization and Human Capital on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 2157–2167. https://ajindex.com/articles/645690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Acemoğlu, D., Zilibotti, F. (1999). Productivity Differences. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6879, 1-44.
  2. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
  3. Apaydın, Ş. (2019). Türkiye’de İktisadi Küreselleşmenin Büyüme Üzerindeki Yapısal ve Tarihsel Etkileri. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 4(1), 1-27.
  4. Apaydın, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkileri. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42.
  5. Babatunde, A. (2011).
  6. Trade Openness, Infrastructure, FDI and Growth in Sub-Saharan African Countries. Journal of Management Policy, 12(7), 27-36.
  7. Barro, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 3120, 1-25.
  8. Benhabib, J., Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 143- 173. Benarroch, M., Pandey, M. (2008). Trade Openness and Government Size. Economics Letters, 101, 157-159.
  9. Bolaky, B., Freund, C. (2004).
  10. Trade, Regulations, and Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3255, 1-40.
  11. Chen, P., Gupta, R. (2006). An Investigation of Openness and Economic Growth Using Panel Estimation. University of Pretoria Department of Economics Working Paper Series, 22, 1-26.
  12. Chang, R., Kaltani, L., Loayza, N. (2005). The Role of Policy Complementarities. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3763, 1-40.
  13. Doğan, E. (2013). Are There Linkages between Different Types of Globalization and Economic Growth?. Advances in Applied Economics and Finance, 4(1), 678-685.
  14. Eren, M. V., Çütcü, İ. (2018). Küreselleşmenin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Ekonometrik Analiz. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 47-61.
  15. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1991).
  16. Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth. European Economic Review, 35(2-3), 517-526.
  17. Hanushek, E. A, Woessmann, L. (2020),
  18. Education, Knowledge Capital, and Economic Growth. In S. Bradley, C. Green (Eds), The Economics of Education: A Comprehensive Overview, 171-182.
  19. Hye, Q. M. A. (2012). Long Term Effect of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in Case of Pakistan. Quality and Quantity, 46, 1137-1149.
  20. İbrahim, M., Sare, Y. A. (2018). Determinants of Financial Development in Africa: How Robust Is the Interactive Effect of Trade Openness and Human Capital?. Economic Analysis and Policy, 60, 18-26.
  21. Kneller, R., Morgan, C. W., Kanchana