Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4

The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using Entropy-TOPSIS Method

Türkiye’deki Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Entropi-TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
2213–2227
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric energies take the first three places among the most suitable renewable energy sources for Turkey, followed by solar and wind energies, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of renewable energy sources is increasing day by day as the demand for energy increases significantly in countries with fast-growing populations and economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, 9 criteria were determined as a result of wide literature research and expert opinion and whose significance weights were calculated with the Entropy method; and the hydroelectric, wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy resources in Turkey have been listed with the TOPSIS method and the resources have been evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric energies take the first three places among the most suitable renewable energy sources for Turkey, followed by solar and wind energies, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The importance of renewable energy sources is increasing day by day as the demand for energy increases significantly in countries with fast-growing populations and economies. With this increasing importance, the selection of energy sources is also becoming very complex. This study aimed to evaluate the renewable energy sources in Turkey in terms of criteria such as economy, efficiency, employment, social acceptability, and economic life. In this context, 9 criteria were determined as a result of wide literature research and expert opinion and whose significance weights were calculated with the Entropy method; and the hydroelectric, wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy resources in Turkey have been listed with the TOPSIS method and the resources have been evaluated. The findings revealed that biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric energies take the first three places among the most suitable renewable energy sources for Turkey, followed by solar and wind energies, respectively.

Özet

Hızlı büyüyen nüfus ve ekonomiye sahip ülkelerde enerjiye olan talep önemli ölçüde arttığından, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının önemi de her geçen gün artmaktadır. Artan önemle birlikte bu kaynakların seçimi de oldukça karmaşık bir hal almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının ekonomiklik, verimlilik, istihdam, sosyal kabul edilebilirlik ve ekonomik ömür gibi kriterler açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda geniş bir literatür araştırması ve uzman görüşü sonucunda belirlenen ve önem düzeyi ağırlıkları Entropi yöntemi ile hesaplanan 9 adet kriter, Türkiye’de bulunan hidroelektrik, rüzgâr, güneş, biyokütle ve jeotermal enerji kaynakları TOPSIS yöntemi ile sıralanmış ve kaynaklar değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular; Türkiye açısından ihtiyaç duyulan yenilenebilir enerji santralleri arasında ilk üç sırayı biyokütle, jeotermal ve hidroelektrik enerji santrallerinin aldığını, bunları sırasıyla güneş ve rüzgâr enerjisi santrallerinin takip ettiğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜNER, Z., ÖZGÜNER, M. (2022). The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using Entropy-TOPSIS Method. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4, 2213–2227. https://ajindex.com/articles/645583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahmad, S., Tahar R. M. (2014). “Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: a case of Malaysia”. Renewable Energy, No: 63, pp. 458-466.
  2. Alizadeh, R., Soltanisehat, L., Lund, P. D., Zamanisabzi, H. (2020). “Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method”. Energy Policy. No: 137, pp.22-33.
  3. Amer, M., Daim, T.U. (2011). “Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: A case of Pakistan”. Energy Sustain Dev., Vol:15, No: 420, pp.27-35.
  4. Apaydın, S., Tasdogan, C. (2019). “The long run effects of renewable and primary energy demand on growth in Turkey”. Third Sector Social Economic Review, Vol:54, No:1, pp. 431-445.
  5. Atıcı, K.B., Ulucan, A. (2009). “Enerji projelerinin değerlendirilmesi sürecinde çok kriterli karar verme yaklaşımları ve Türkiye uygulamaları”. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Vol: 27, No: 1, pp. 161-186.
  6. Beccalı, M., Cellura, M., Mistretta, M. (1998). “Decision-making in energy planning: Application of the electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology”. Renewable Energy. No:28, pp. 2063-2087. Chen,Y.C., Hung, M., Wang,Y. (2018). “The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China”. Journal of Account. Econ. Vol:65, No: 1, pp. 169- 190. Derse, O., Yontar, E. (2020). “SWARA-TOPSIS yöntemi ile en uygun yenilenebilir enerji kaynağının belirlenmesi”. Journal of Industrial Engineering. Vol: 31, No:3, pp. 389-410.
  7. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas,G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). “Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method”, Computers & Operations Research. Vol:22, No: 7, pp. 763- 770. Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Kaya, I. (2013). “Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: The case of Turkey”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol: 19, No: 1, pp. 38-62.
  8. Freeman, J., Chen, T. (2015). “Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework”. Supply Chain Management. Vol: 20, No: 3, pp. 327-340.
  9. Garni, H.A., Kassem, A., Awasthi, A., Komljenovic, D., Al-Haddad, K. (2016). “A multicriteria decision-making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. No: 16. pp. 137-150.
  10. Georgiou, D., Mohammed, E.S., Rozakis, S. (2015). “Multi-